The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Cafe Society

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-01-2005, 09:58 PM
Terrifel Terrifel is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
When and why did the tradition of popular songs "fading out" at the end originate?

While listening to the radio the other day, the thought occurred to me that a large proportion of modern recorded popular music seems to have no real "ending" as such--instead, a given musical phrase or lyric is repeated endlessly as the volume just sort of fades out. I can't help but suspect that people raised outside the influence of contemporary Western-style recorded pop music* must find this "non-ending" device to be fairly odd. How did this tradition get started? Is there a point in the history of recorded music when it suddenly became fashionable to "fade out" at the end of songs? Was there a single influential group or recording studio that originated this technique?

It seems like it would make just as much sense to have a song "fade in" at the beginning, and yet most musicians seem to prefer some sort of definitive start to their songs. Why, then, the big fadeout at the end rather than a proper closure, such as music intended to be performed "live" has?

*assuming that there are such people anywhere in the world anymore.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 02-01-2005, 10:13 PM
Askia Askia is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,155
It's a radio convention, probably started sometime in the 50s ... a cue for the DJ to start talking or pop in a cart for the advertisiers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-01-2005, 10:33 PM
Nonsuch Nonsuch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 1,915
It also saves the musicians the trouble of having to write an ending.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-01-2005, 10:46 PM
ultrafilter ultrafilter is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonsuch
It also saves the musicians the trouble of having to write an ending.
It's just as well; it seems very few of them can.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2005, 11:34 PM
KJ KJ is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
I've often wondered... on a song that just fades out at the end, what do the artists do when they perform the song live?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2005, 11:40 PM
Snooooopy Snooooopy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Jacksonville, N.C.
Posts: 9,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ
I've often wondered... on a song that just fades out at the end, what do the artists do when they perform the song live?
What have they done at the concerts you've been to?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2005, 12:28 AM
Voyager Voyager is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deep Space
Posts: 30,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terrifel

It seems like it would make just as much sense to have a song "fade in" at the beginning, and yet most musicians seem to prefer some sort of definitive start to their songs. Why, then, the big fadeout at the end rather than a proper closure, such as music intended to be performed "live" has?
"Key to the Highway" on the Derek and the Dominos album fades in, by the way.

It's been around since the early '60s. On "The Cough Song" which is on the bootleg album, Dylan is playing the Nashville Skyline Rag, and then starts to cough.
He say "That's the end, it fades out,"
and Bob Johnson says
"Thanks a lot. I'll make a note here 'fade at cough'."

I think the real reason is not to write an ending, though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-02-2005, 01:19 AM
KJ KJ is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snooooopy
What have they done at the concerts you've been to?
Good point. I could count the number of concerts I've been two on one hand. Two if you count local bands where I knew the people in the band.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-02-2005, 01:21 AM
KJ KJ is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
two=to
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-02-2005, 02:31 AM
Snooooopy Snooooopy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Jacksonville, N.C.
Posts: 9,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ
Good point. I could count the number of concerts I've been two on one hand. Two if you count local bands where I knew the people in the band.
I wondered if this might be the case. So, to reanswer your question, I would think that the band just starts fading out until one designated band member plays the "hey guys, time to end the song" riff or drum roll or whatever.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-02-2005, 05:15 AM
todd33rpm todd33rpm is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ
I've often wondered... on a song that just fades out at the end, what do the artists do when they perform the song live?
Da-da-da, da-da-da-da, da
Da-da-da-DA, with a whispered *yeah* at the end.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-02-2005, 08:02 AM
Windwalker Windwalker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
I think the best justification for the fade out I've heard is that it gives the impression of timelessness, of the music going on forever. This kinda makes sense for songs like "We Didn't Start The Fire" (Billy Joel), which ends with a fade of:

We didn't start the fire...
It was always burning since the world's been turning...

The song's about the endless fire of revolutionaries and it makes sense that the music would never really end.

Of course, I'm sure that a lot of the time, "timelessness" may just be an ad hoc excuse for not writing an ending, as people have already noted
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-02-2005, 09:13 AM
kunilou kunilou is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 15,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Askia
It's a radio convention, probably started sometime in the 50s ... a cue for the DJ to start talking or pop in a cart for the advertisiers.
Goes back a damn site further than that. I remember on some of my parents' old 78 rpm records the songs faded out. Those were from the 30s, and since radio didn't get into playing records in a big way until the late 1940s, it's more probably a record company convention that radio just picked up.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-02-2005, 10:08 AM
Walloon Walloon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: America's Dairyland
Posts: 12,780
I like its cousin, the desconstructive ending, where the musicians fade out or stop one by one until only one element is heard. The Beatles' psychedelic Tomorrow Never Knows ends this way, with only a rollicking tack piano remaining at the fadeout.

Mike Oldfield's epic Tubular Bells grandly announces each instrument toward a swelling climax ("Two slightly distorted guitars! Mandolin!"), then draws them away until all that remains are a female choir and acoustic guitar, then just the guitar.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-02-2005, 10:33 AM
Walloon Walloon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: America's Dairyland
Posts: 12,780
Upon further reflection on the OP: The fadeout convention proably came out when songwriters moved from writing "standards", to be performed by live performers, and with an eye on sheet music sales, to writing for a particular artist and a particular recording. In other words, the shift of music from a live medium to a recorded medium.

As kunilou said, the shift in American radio programming in the 1940s from primarily live music to playing recorded music was probably influential in that paradigm change. (And if you are further curious why that happened, part of it had to do with the settlement of a royalties contract dispute between the record companies and the American Federation of Musicians, after a recording strike that lasted two years.)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-02-2005, 01:20 PM
mack mack is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyager
"Key to the Highway" on the Derek and the Dominos album fades in, by the way.
As does "The Low Spark of High Heeled Boys" by Traffic.

"Roundabout" by Yes fades in, sort of. Actually it's more of a swell than a fade in.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-02-2005, 03:36 PM
Terrifel Terrifel is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walloon
Upon further reflection on the OP: The fadeout convention proably came out when songwriters moved from writing "standards", to be performed by live performers, and with an eye on sheet music sales, to writing for a particular artist and a particular recording. In other words, the shift of music from a live medium to a recorded medium.

As kunilou said, the shift in American radio programming in the 1940s from primarily live music to playing recorded music was probably influential in that paradigm change. (And if you are further curious why that happened, part of it had to do with the settlement of a royalties contract dispute between the record companies and the American Federation of Musicians, after a recording strike that lasted two years.)
This is an aspect that I hadn't been aware of, and now I'm wondering if I hadn't been thinking about the question the wrong way round. If I had been forced to hypothesize, I would have guessed that the fadeout tradition had possibly originated as an artifact from the recording of live, public performances of jazz and similar music: that perhaps musicians back then, as now, might have often wound up a number with an extended free-form coda (or whatever the hell you call it when a guitarist noodles endlessly at the finish of a performance). Thus, the fadeout would have been a convenient technique for packaging these recordings for radio play and distribution, and eventually the convention came to signify "live and spontaneous" music, even to the point of ultimately being adopted by studio-recorded musicians.

But based on the observations of kunilou and Walloon, it seems that the opposite is more likely to be true; that the fadeout tradition was established by the songwriters themselves, as a result of the decline of live radio music.

Unfortunately, I have a far less than encyclopedic familiarity with the history of recorded music. It would be interesting to know what the earliest song specifically written to fade out was, and what musical genre it represented.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-02-2005, 05:02 PM
Beware of Doug Beware of Doug is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunilou
Goes back a damn site further than that. I remember on some of my parents' old 78 rpm records the songs faded out. Those were from the 30s, and since radio didn't get into playing records in a big way until the late 1940s, it's more probably a record company convention that radio just picked up.
It was very far from being a convention in the 30s - I must have heard thousands of pop records from that era, and can think of only a handful that used the "board fade" (a term that originated in radio, BTW - you turn a dial on the control board and fade out the program).

The earliest example I have on hand of a board fade is a rendition of Forty Second Street from 1933 where the band (Don Bestor's) just plays stop time quarter notes under sound effects, cop whistle, trolley bell, car horn etc. Funnily enough, they didn't quite pot down the mic enough, so if you listen closely you can actually hear the band stop playing...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-02-2005, 05:05 PM
Beware of Doug Beware of Doug is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Oop, forgot the link...Forty Second Street (RealAudio required)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-02-2005, 07:41 PM
Randolph Randolph is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
I read somewhere that the fadeout was either introduced (or popularized) by jukeboxes - the companies behind the jukeboxes, rather. It was to create the impression that you hadn't heard the entire song, and would be more likely to play more music.

I've tried to look up a cite, but Google mostly returns audio software pages...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-15-2005, 01:19 AM
don't ask don't ask is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14,883
There is a lengthy discussion hidden away here that dates it back to 78s from the turn of the 20th Century.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.