What kind of DNC Chair will Howard Dean make?

There was a crowded field of candidates to become the new Chair of the Democratic National Committee, but now all but Howard Dean have bowed out of the running. This weekend’s election in DC will really be more of a coronation. So what kind of Chair will Dean make?

To get us started, here are Dean’s answers to a set of questions which MoveOn PAC submitted to all the candidates. They can at least give us some insight as to what kind of Chair he intends to be. Whether he can pull it off, and whether his answers to these questions really have anything to do with the DNC Chair’s job, are issues open to debate.

Based solely on geographic proximity, I’d say an Adirondack Chair.

Sorry. Someone had to do it.

I have no idea, but Republican pundits are already lining up to give their phony self-serving “attacknalysis” of why he’ll do a bad job and basically prove that Democrats are atheist baby eaters.

This quote gives me hope. The neo-cons and social conservatives have pushed the Republican Party too far right, it’s time for the Democrats to pull back instead of trying to become Republican-Lite.

Dean’s call for justice could be the sounding trumpet that signals the end of lie that the Republicans hold a monopoly on moral issues. I’m not religious; but I welcome the awakening of the religious people who realize that the Republicans don’t support their call to compassion. In fact, I’d say the current administration lacks morality. Dean’s comments mesh well with the comments made by the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church and by Jim Wallis, an evangelical minister who leads the Sojourners and Call for Renewal groups that focus on social justice and eliminating poverty.

from the Presiding Bishop

from the Sojourners website

A sadly ineffective one. He’s too easily painted as a liberal nutjob by his opponents, and the main run of US voters will too easily buy it.

I think he was the man the party needed four years ago. Now . . . nah, just nothing. He’ll be Rush fodder for his tenure, and won’t ever gain the traction to lead the party in any meaningful way.

But who cares if he’s skewered in the media. He’s not running for public office or anything, and the number of people who will vote for candidates based on how they view the chairman of their party is miniscule. Dean’s success or failure will be viewed in how well he does in orgainzing the Democratic party, fund raising, getting the message out, stuff like that.

Dean was a fairly lousey presidential candidate. He simply didn’t have the experience to run a national campaign, and in his campaign stops he sounded like he was talking to Vermonters, not the nation. As such he wouldn’t be my first choice for Chairman. That said, I have a lot of faith in the man, I lived in VT during most of his tenure as governor and was impressed, my parents have worked with him in several different capacities and several close friends were “Deaniacs” during the 2004 campaign. I think he’s smart enough to have learned from the mistakes that both he and other Dems made in 2004 and I’ll remain optimistic that he’ll do better as a DNC chair then he did as a Pres candidate.

I think it’s where he belongs and where he can yield the most power, most effectively. He awoke hope in me (suburban mom with kids–and they play soccer! What ho!) and I wanted him over Kerry, b/c IMO, Dean understood the abysmal state of health care in this country. Hothead? So what? We need a hothead–the Dems need someone who is NOT afraid to speak his mind and take a stand. Dems must be FOR something–carve out a position, and don’t alow the other party to set the agenda–something the neo-cons excell at.

You’re right. And I believe that Dean is too high-profile to succeed, except among the die-hard party faithful. In his case, I think it does very much matter if he gets skewered in the press, because the people he must rally and organize and get the message to are not all do-or-die Dems.

With all respect, I think that’s at the core of the problem with Dean. Too many people already believe he’s a hothead, when he simply is not.

I’m not sure how much of an impact any given party chair can have, but I see no reason why Dean can’t be effective. He’s shown that he’s good at raising money, and I suspect that is the one area where the party chairman can make a difference. Personally, I think Dean got a bum rap by the press. His so-called “I Have a Scream” speech was blown WAY out of proportion, and I get the feeling that the press just wanted something, anything, to latch on to in order to explain the big mistake most of them made by crowning him as the front runner too early.

As for his Democractic ideals:

That is stock Democratic politics and could have been said by almost anyone in the part, so I don’t think that tells us very much at all.

The key to the Democrats winning the presidency next time is simply to pick the right candidate-- someone not from the Seante, not from the Northease, but someone with executive experience and who can talk to middle America. It ain’t rocket science…

Gaining back controll of Congress might be a bit harder, and it isn’t at all clear to me how that happens unless the Republicans are seen by the electorate as having screwed things up too much…

Perhaps my understanding of what a party chairman is supposed to do is flawed, but I think he is supposed to rally and organize the do-or-die dems. They, in turn, are supposed to get everyone else on board. The face of the party to the populace is the candidates, they are the ones that voters see and care about and hopefully vote for. The job of the party chairman is to organize those candidates, get them money, etc. Dean may or may not be good at these things, but unless 2006 and 2008 are increadably slow election seasons, I don’t think the avearage voter will hear much about Dean’s beliefs one way or another.

And if nothing else, I expect he’ll see to it that the goddamn balloons will come down on time at the 2008 DNC.

That’s what I think, too. He seemed to do well at inspiring people and very well at raising money. That’s what the job entails. Doesn’t matter if he’s a liberal. He’s not making up the party platform, running for office, or naming candidates. Does anyone know anything about Ed Gillespie’s politics?

Sorry, I should of clarified that. I don’t feel that Dean is a hothead–I believe he has strong convictions. I feel he has been depicted as a hothead by media and those on the right whose job it is to marginalize and demonize all who disagree with them politically.

Crikey! that’s I should HAVE clarified, not “of”…

Good point!

I disagree. I don’t think his infamous “yea haw” was an isolated incident. He does not present himself well.

Recent Dean quote: “I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for, but I admire their discipline and their organization,”

Try to imagine a former Republican Presidential candidate saying that about Democrats. How do you expect him, as a representative of the Democratic Party, to win over voters with this attitude?

Aside from the fact that he just alienated every registered Republican, He’s a nutjob in front of a camera. If you watch him in any interview he goes from sane to goofy in mid-sentence. He then reverts to sound bites with a look on his face that’s something between Charley McCarthy and Jack Nicholson in “The Shinning”.

I have nothing against him personally. His views are his own and may reflect the party. However, his presentation is so bad that I suspect he has the full support of the GOP.

That’s not his job.

That would explain the last election.

:smack: That’s not THE CHAIRMAN OF THE RNC OR DNC’s JOB.

Marley23,

You’re right, it’s not his job to run for office but I’m pretty sure alienating cross-over votes is not on the job description. You may like his politics but that doesn’t help your cause if he’s doing more harm than good.