Calling all ass-kickers, barroom-brawlers, martial artistes and general aggro-merchants: What’s the SD on brass knuckles?
Here are some talking points (I have never encountered a set of brass knuckles, so WAGs aplenty)
Added value. Clearly, punching someone hard in the face with a pair of knuckledusters is going to be ruinous, but punching someone hard in the face with a closed fist is brutal by itself. How much are you really gaining by donning the dusters? And are you not putting your hands at serious risk of breakage? I can see brass knuckles exponentionally increasing the damage a feeble person can achieve with a punch, but this is surely not a weapon for the physically weak to be throwing around.
Related point is that you restrict your hand strikes to punches, although I suppose it is conceivable to palm strike etc wearing a set of knuckles.
Escalation of the situation. Breaking out the knuckledusters strikes me as an event that should ideally require careful consideration. Once they’re on its defcon 1, there’s not going to be any shaking hands and concillatory beers after you’ve been using a lump of metal to beat on someone’s head.
Keeping it simple. In the real-world scenario of a street assault or mugging, this has to be what its all about. Putting on the brass knuckles at a time of crisis just seems to be complicating the issue at hand. There is a certain amount of intimidation value inherent in the brass knuckles, but you better make sure you know how to use them before getting them out (see above). Is there any valid self-defense use of brass knuckles for a law-abiding citizen?
The concealed weapon There’s no denying the discrete nature of a set of knuckles in the coat pocket. Easy on, easy off etc. In the UK, were no one carries a firearm, its probably one of the most serious weapons that you could confront. As a result, they are exclusively perceived to be a criminal accoutrement. Expect no favours from the magistrate if you’re drunk and disorderly, swinging the dusters left and right.