The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2005, 12:52 AM
dnooman dnooman is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,580
.22s standard issue for the F.B.I.?

Why would the F.B.I. issue such a small caliber gun to their agents? I've heard about the .22 being a round that doesn't like to exit the body, but isn't "stopping power" still a concern? I thought they used to use Sig Sauer .45s, now Glock .22s? Why?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 10-28-2005, 01:00 AM
Padeye Padeye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Phoenix, AZ, US
Posts: 7,672
You are apparently confused by Glock's designations. A Glock model 22 is in .40 S&W caliber.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-28-2005, 01:06 AM
John F John F is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
The .22 is a lot nastier than people give it credit for. You're right it does not like to exit but rather bounce around tumbling and ripping things up as it goes.

I can think of a couple advantages of using it as a carry weapon like potential collateral damage and control issues.

Range is also something to think about, they might have studies that show a .22 is a good choice from where they normally fire from.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2005, 01:16 AM
dnooman dnooman is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Padeye
You are apparently confused by Glock's designations. A Glock model 22 is in .40 S&W caliber.
Ah. That could be. I'll ask my source more specific dimension questions. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2005, 01:27 AM
Scruloose Scruloose is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2000
It doesn't appear that Glock even offers a .22: http://www.glock.com/pistols.htm
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2005, 01:30 AM
Padeye Padeye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Phoenix, AZ, US
Posts: 7,672
Glock's model numbers have caused no end of confusion. The original Glock 17 held 19 rounds of ammunition in it's magazine but the model 19 held fewer rounds.

FWIW some people make the same argument about the .40 S&W, calling it the .40 short & weak. At one time the FBI was keen on the 10mm but it's near magnum recoil and large, 45 ACP size grip caused problems for some agents. 9mm Parabellum doesn't have those problems but a shootout in Miami several years showed it had inadequate performance. .40 S&W allows for pistols the same external size as 9mm parabellum but with more kinetic energy and a bigger bullet. Glock has even introduced a ballistic twin to the .45 ACP, the .45 GAP, in order to make a big bore handgun with a more compact grip size.

http://www.glock.com/g22.htm
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-28-2005, 01:50 AM
cerberus cerberus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
I own a Glock Model 22. Last time I checked, it chambered .40SW.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2005, 02:21 AM
CynicalGabe CynicalGabe is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
My plan to purchase a Steyr M9 fell though, seeing as how it is not on the approved CA DOJ handgun list.

So it looks like 1911 .45 time for me.

Just thought I'd share.

But I've already got more .22s than I can count. Highly underrated little cartridge.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-28-2005, 02:24 AM
cerberus cerberus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
...And the SIG used by the FBI was the P-226, a 9mm pistol. FBI tactical teams can use .45ACP pistols.

The Glock Model 22 is one of the dominant market share weapons in the police market. The .40SW fits nicely between the 9mm Parabellum and the .45ACP.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.