|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dormancy fee on my savings account!?
I opened a savings account at a local bank seven years ago. Since then I moved, and the bank has no branches near me. I have an ATM card, but using it will cost me a fee because, again, the bank has no branches near me. I’ve left the account alone, content to leave the relatively small amount of money in it to earn interest, and knowing that I might access the money via the ATM card if necessary.
I was unpleasantly surprised to open a recent statement from the bank (Manufacturer’s Bank) in which I was told that a $10.00 dormancy fee had been assessed to my account. Ten dollars may not seem like a lot, but when the annual interest earned is roughly two dollars, it’s frustrating to have years worth of interest swept away without my knowledge. I called the bank and was told that I have to at least do a balance inquiry on my account every eighteen months to avoid the fee. Of course I knew nothing of this, and of course it was buried in the fine print when I opened the account. I’m angry about it, though, and I feel like closing the account—something I’ve avoided doing because I’ve read that closing accounts isn’t good from a credit rating standpoint. So my question is: do all banks have these dormant fees? If so, I’ll leave the account open. If not, I’ll close it as my little way of showing them what I think of their dormancy fee. |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Call them back, re-explain the situation to whomever answers the phone. Ask if they can remove the fee ("I wasn't aware there was a dormancy fee, it's been so long since I've read the original terms, is there anyway you could remove that?), if/when they say no, tell them you'd like to close the account and ask them to mail a check for the balance. Closing a savaings account should have no effect on your credit report.
Oh, and make sure your calm and talk nicely. Calling up angry will result in the other person being defensive and holding their ground. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
All banks may not charge a dormant fee, but all banks within the US are under regulatory requirements to track and eventually get rid of these accounts. In some states, the balance is transferred to the state.
The reason for this is that dormant accounts represent accountholders who have forgetton about the account or are dead. Without the regulations, funds from these accounts could be easily stolen by bank employees and there would be little chance of discovery. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
You don't have to deposit or withdraw for an account to be active: merely going to the branch and asking them to update your interest is enough.
I don't think they have to contact you, but any account that has no transactions after a given amount of time (varies by state) is transferred to the state. Note that you can get the money back from the state at any time (there's usually a department that handles it), but you get no interest added after the state takes it over.
__________________
"One never knows, do one?" Provider of quality fantasy and science fiction since 1982. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And many banks are claiming that they are only required to turn over to the state inactive accounts, and since there was a transaction on the account this year (their $10 dormancy fee) it isn't inactive. So in effect, the bank never turns it over to the state unclaimed property dept, but instead keeps it active and takes a little bit out of the account every year, until they've got all of it. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I discovered the hard way that my former bank charges a whopping $25/month inactivity fee. That's why they're my former bank.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
My CU sent me a notice of inactivity on one of our savings accounts, warning me to do something with it in the next year to avoid this kind of thing. I guess credit unions are nicer than commercial banks. At least I got a note.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why should banks in a nominally capitalist society charge nothing for maintaining small, inactive accounts that generate no activity (and little profit) for the banks? When did they become charities? Why is charging a fee unreasonable?
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
I remember studying a bank's annual report a few years back and 40% of their income came from fees.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|