You too can write puzzle clues!

In this thread, we got distracted into a clue-writing challenge. I promised to start a new thread dedicated to the fine art of writing clues, and here it is.

First, some general tips and guidelines on clue-writing:

Use matching parts of speech:

It is absolutely essential that the solver be able to tell the part of speech of the answer word by the phrasing of the clue.

  • For synonyms, use nouns to clue nouns, verbs to clue verbs, etc. When in doubt, use the word-substitution test: think of a sentence using the word to be clued, then substitute your clue in to see if it works or not. (For instance, if you clue DOGMATIC with “Express oneself arrogantly,” then try the sample sentence, “Fred is really __,” you’ll see that the clue doesn’t work.)
  • If you’re using examples, make sure the part of speech is indicated by the phrasing. For instance, you can clue an adjective by saying “Like a [whatever],” or an adverb by saying “How a [whatever] [does whatever].”
    *Make sure you’ve got the right number, tense, etc., when you do have the right part of speech: This includes things like singular vs. plural nouns; present tense vs. past tense verbs; regular vs. comparative or superlative forms of adjectives, etc.

Indicate when the answer word is an abbreviation or short version of a word:

  • “Vet” is short for “Veterinarian,” so you can indicate that either by shortening a word in the clue (“Dog’s doc”) or by actually saying so (“Fido’s physician, for short”).
  • Use an abbreviation in the clue to indicate that there’s an abbreviation in the answer, or add “abbr.” Note: If the abbreviation is part of a standard title (“Mr. Ed,” “Dr. No”), this isn’t necessary.
  • Do not use abbreviations or other shortenings in the clue if there is none in the answer. (“Neighbor of Pennsylvania [not ‘PA’ or ‘Penna.’]” for OHIO; “__ Claire, Wisconsin [not ‘WI’ or ‘Wisc.’]” for EAU.

Clues should read as coherent bits of English:

  • In general, do not use an article at the beginning of a clue, but do within a clue. For instance, clue ELM as “Shade tree,” not “A shade tree” – because the clue “A shade tree” would lead to the answer “An elm.” (You’ll catch this if you do the sentence substitution test mentioned above.) On the other hand, do use articles within clues, because they will ordinarily go there. For instance, another possible clue for elm would be “Tree found in an arboretum,” not “Tree found in arboretum.”
  • For verbs: although the RH definition starts with “to,” do not use the “to” in the clue. (For ENTER: RH reads “to come or go in,” but clues would be “Come in” or “Go in.”)

Provide some sort of context for a word or phrase if you’re doing a “fill-in-the-blank” clue:

  • If you’re doing a quote of some sort, provide enough of the quote for the solver to recognize it (“Over __ and through the trees,” not just “Over __”). Note: Do not use the final period within the quotes even if you’re quoting a full sentence.
  • Check the original source to make sure you’re quoting correctly, including possible variant spellings, etc. (It’s “Ol’ Man River,” not “Old Man River”; “That’s all, folks!” needs the comma, etc.)
  • If it’s a two-word phrase or title, add some parenthetical info to narrow things down a little. For instance, “ ‘Star __’ ” is way too wide open; make it “ ‘Star __’ (‘60s TV series)” or “ ‘Star __’ (1977 film)” or something like that.
  • Remember that if the blank starts the clue, that is considered the first word, so the word following the blank doesn’t get the “start of clue” capitalization (“__ table” for COFFEE, not “__ Table”).
  • You may not break compound words for fill-in-the blanks (“Brief__” for CASE is not okay), but you can use the component parts in a mix-or-match fashion (“Word after brief or suit,” for CASE).
  • Do a fill-in-the-blank even when there’s only one word aside from the answer word, unless the single word is “A,” “An,” or “The.” Thus: “On __” for BROADWAY; “My __” for SHARONA, etc., but, “Dustin Hoffman movie, with ‘The’” for GRADUATE.

Be sensitive to the difference between general categories and specific examples:
Don’t clue a specific item by naming its category. For instance, you can’t clue “Mascara” by saying “Makeup”; you need to say “Type of makeup,” “Type of eye makeup,” “Cosmetics counter purchase,” or the like. Again – sentence substitution will help you catch these. (By the way, “Makeup” would be an okay clue for “Cosmetics,” since they’re at the same level of generality.)

(Note: “RH” in the above refers to Random House, the unabridged dictionary we use at the puzzle factory)
This is intro to intro to cluing – but it should be enough to get you started on phrasing conventions, etc.

On easy, medium, hard clues:

An easy clue should indicate the answer in a virtually Pavlovian fashion – well-known titles, most famous people with a particular name, etc. A good easy clue is actually really hard to write – if it’s that straight-forward as to be obvious, it’s probably already been done to death.

A medium clue should require a few seconds of thought, but should be solvable by a reasonably savvy individual. Pop culture and current events references are often good for these.

A hard clue either calls for less-common knowlege, or it is phrased in a misleading way. (Most obvious example – using “Nice” in clues for French words, like “Nice summer” for “ete.”) It should leave the solver challenged and feeling good about him-/herself when s/he gets it, not pissed off at its obscurity. This can be a very fine line to walk.

Okay – ready?

Here’s the challange:

Write three to five clues at each difficulty level for STARE.

Here’s the procedure:

Read this OP carefully, and feel free to post any questions you have – but don’t read other people’s posts before posting your own clues. You don’t have to worry about repeating what someone else has done, just work on your own clues.

I’ll keep an eye on things and critique entries as they’re done.

Ladies and gentlemen, sharpen your pencils!

Easy -

Gaze fixedly
Watch intently
Blank _____

Medium -

Basilisk danger
Space gaze, maybe
1000 yard look

Hard -

Kubrick trademark
(This is probably pushing it) Italian existence infinitive
With decisis, follows a precedent

I’d like to change my “Italian existence infinitive” because, well my Italian sucks and so does that clue.

Make it: Italian stay?

Your easy “Blank __” isn’t easy – could be check, verse, etc.

Your mediums are all nice – good clues, right on target for difficulty.

Your hards are good, though the Italian one, even rewritten, is definitely on the line between “hard” and “obnoxious.” (Alas, fewer people know Italian than French or Spanish.) And I’d switch the phrasing on the third to:

__ decisis (follows a precedent)

That’s a style thing, though, the idea is good.

Overall – B+

Woo hoo, that’s a good sight better than I expected to score after putting all of five minutes into it (and deciding that you’re really evil for picking a word like stare!)

Well, the challenge isn’t coming up with fun clues for fun words – it’s coming up with good clues to words you’re sick to freakin’ death of seeing.

I’ve got something a little more fun in mind for the next round, but y’all have to eat your veggies first.

Easy:
-Look at incessantly
-Vacant look
-Gaze openmouthed
-Look Mom says is inpolite
-Blank ______

Medium:
-_____ Decisis
-Eyeballs intensely
-Psyche-out tactic
-Tactic used for Magic Eye posters

Hard:
-Basilisk’s weapon
-___ case; Misspeller’s means of ascension?
-Ronson’s The Men Who ____ at Goats


I know the second one in “hard” is a stretch. But I enjoyed it. I think what I feel is medium versus easy versus hard might be a little jumbled. Hope I didn’t repeat too many either…

Thanks twickster (and, a nice added bonus: I like how you took last time’s word and added an “e”----ingenious!)

I thought that Basilisk one was pretty original…then I noticed that only one other person has done this little challenge & they used it. sigh

Heh, if it’s any consolation, I thought so too.

I thought even more so for stare decisis! SHeesh, that’s what I get for trying to have an original thought on the Dope.

I listened to the Alito confirmation hearings—that phrase was basically drilled into my skull for an entire week. A year ago? I woulda been awestuck by your knowhow.

I like how you phrased the basilisk clue, which is half the trick. (That’s why I said “don’t look at other people’s entries” – this is about what you come up with, not a competition against other people.)

__ decisis needs a little additional info, since it’s not a common phrase; Blank __ also, for the reason mentioned above. Look at incessantly needs to be rephrased to pass the sentence substition test; it should be Look incessantly (at). Love the mom rudeness clue – nice, easy, but very vivid! yay!

Other than __ decisis, I love your medium clues – they require a bit of thought but pay off with a nod and a smile. Good work.

Your hards: Basilisk is wonderful, as I said; like your semi-cryptic one, but wouldn’t actually let you use it in a crossword magazine; and don’t know the Ronson reference, so assume that’s okay.

And, yeah, that was exactly how I decided on “stare” – I wanted to do a verb this time (not that y’all aren’t okay to use it as a noun). Your figuring that out puts you at a solid B+. (Ah, shit, am I supposed to be grading on a curve?)

Thanks, twickster. That was a great way to start my work day—which consequently is my last day of work. The Ronson book is a recommended & very weird read that should be taken with a grain of salt about a few select lunatics in the higher ranks of the US military. My dad gave it to me with the inscription “Weird shit; hope you like it.”

Yeah—I didn’t figure the mispellers one would work. But I love that style clue in crosswords----speaking of which, is there any name for that, you know, the puns or play on word clues that end with question marks? Just curious.

Easy:
Ogle
Fixed look
____ down (intimidate)
Medium:
Rubberneck
1000 yard look
Medusa’s will freeze you

Hard:
Lifted lids, perhaps
Blink and it’s gone (probably obnoxious)

That’s all I got for now.

For the record, I really like rubberneck.

Rubberneck is good; Blink and it’s gone is great. Medusa is good for a medium clue; the others are good, if not inspired.

A- (based on the blink clue, which I may “borrow” at some point)

Incidentally, Will Shortz has a rule that you can provide at most three other words in a clue with a blank.

Thanks! It was a great brain teaser for my boring morning. Feel free to borrow anything you like.

Twickster, may I be permitted a slight hijack here?

Do professional crossword constructors ever use any kind of computer program to help them come up with the words in the puzzle or are they all lovingly hand-crafted?

I remember a recent discussion with my son who is convinced that all puzzles are basically computer generated and my vain efforts trying to persuade him otherwise.

As much as I enjoy solving puzzles, I can’t even begin to wrap my brain around the patience required to start with an empty symmetrical grid and try to fill it with words that intersect each other.

Are there any books that give help to budding crossword constructors, or is it mostly a talent you’re born with?

Thanks.
[/hijack]

Did not know that. Makes sense, at least for a quote. (Sometimes if it’s a title, you’d need more than that just to identify properly: " ‘The __ Candidate’ (2004 remake) " would be four words, but not exactly verbose. If actually cluing “the river,” I’d probably do “Over __ and through…,” which would hit Will’s mark, and would also avoid repeating a fragment of the answer (“the”) in the clue, which is another no-no.

FatBaldGuy: This is the single best how-to on writing crosswords; and no, it’s not really worth $100+. You should be able to find a copy somewhere for a little less than that.

Yes, a lot of people are doing machine-filled grids – I can tell the difference, and I’m not impressed. (See the thing in the other thread about TOT vs. FEZ.) How do you get good at it? Practice. Practice practice practice.