Pool: why is men's and women's separated???

[Rog668]

Ok, I'm not much of a pooler, so I've always wanted an answer to this question... I watch the pool gods and goddesses on ESPN2 every now and then (right between underwater basketweaving and synchronized kayaking - god bless ESPN2) and I can't help but note that they actually have separate divisions for men and women...

OK, this is not Football. It doesn't seem to me that a man or a woman would have any kind of advantage over the other. So why is it always divided? Is there a pool player out there who can actually give me some kind of answer, or are they just trying to get some sort of bar-chick-fetished fan base at 3 in the morning on ESPN2???

I know it's lame, but I gotta know!

- Rog

[DAVEW0071]

Are you kidding? It's obvious isn't it? Who wants to play with girls? You wanna get cooties or something?

[CandyMan]

They do this so women can win money and be attracted to the sport. This sounds sexist, but its the truth. Men played pool all the time and could compete as they got older with other men at a level that women (who had not been playing all thier life) could not compete on. So seperate divisions were made.

Now, WHY are thier STILL a womans division? Because there still isn't a large enough female pool to pull from for the tournaments.

The truly scary part is, that if you take the women's records (most racks ran, etc..) they can't touch the mens. But hey, give them time.

There are also a couple of "muscle" shots in pool. The break is one and a what I call a force follow is another. These shots it really does help to be a bit stronger.

Darts is the same thing.. go figure...

CandyMan

[KneadToKnow]

It's a sexual harassment thing.

The lady players go tired of all the accidents when Mississippi Slim was chalking his cue while they were leaning over the table.

:couldn't resist:

[Sam Stone]

The simple fact is that women are not competitive with men. Not even close. If the best woman in the world were to join the men's tour, I doubt she could crack the top 50.

Why? I don't know. In 9-ball strength plays a part because the break is very important (although technique is more important here - Nick Varner has a very hard break, and he weighs 120 lbs). But it's not just strength - it's consistency, focus, and all those other intangibles.

In straight pool, which requires absolutely no strength whatsoever other than the ability to lift a cue, the highest recorded run for a female EVER is 89 balls. I know ten guys in my city who can run that many, and I've done it myself. In men's straight pool competition (a race to 150 balls), it's common for one person to run 150 balls without missing to win the match. The highest recorded run by a male is 562 balls.

Again, I don't know why this is. But women are rarely competitive with men in physical activities. Even pure mental games like Chess have a wide gap between male and female abilities.

There is one exception: Aviation. Women have always held their own in the flying world. Women compete with men in the Aerobatic championships, and Patty Wagstaff has been world champion several times. Women had lower accident rates in WWII as ferry pilots, and the few female fighter squadrons in WWII (Russian) had excellent results (much better than the average for male squadrons).

I guess the point is that the differences between the sexes are much more complex than pure physical strength. We think differently, and excel at different things.

Originally posted by Sam Stone
The simple fact is that women are not competitive with men. Not even close. If the best woman in the world were to join the men's tour, I doubt she could crack the top 50.

I'm sorry--I have to disagree with you there. I've seen female players on the pro circuit who could chalk their palms with ANY man on the tour. I don't pay enough attention to Pro Billiards to name any, I just like watching the Asian chick

But then, with the exception of Tennis Mixed Doubles, there are no sports that I can think of which are combined men/women. Even the ESPN2 sports: bowling, freestyle punk biking, golf (which is the only thing in the world which could bring together Republicans and Lesbians, but that's a whole 'nother thread)

[KevinB]

But then, with the exception of Tennis Mixed Doubles, there are no sports that I can think of which are combined men/women. Even the ESPN2 sports: bowling, freestyle punk biking, golf (which is the only thing in the world which could bring together Republicans and Lesbians, but that's a whole 'nother thread)

Reining horse is one. It's the first western riding discipline approved for international competition, and will be part of the 2008 Olympics. There are no separate men's and women's classes, and women frequently beat the men. While there are youth classes, the youth are also free to compete with the adults, and frequently clean their clocks. My 12-year old daughter can and does consistantly beat men twice her age. Drives them crazy. The horse does most of the physical work. The rider's job is mostly mental, though, obviously, technique and experience make a big difference.

[Sam Stone]

Blessedwolf: You disagree, but you haven't watched enough pool to actually know anyone's names? May I suggest that you watch a little more pool before forming an opinion?

I've been playing pool competitively for years. I've played with some of the best in the world, both male and female. And trust me, it's not even close. Jeanette Lee (the 'asian woman' you spoke of) is good, but she's not even the best female on the circuit right now. Allison Fisher is. And trust me, they can't beat the men at the highest levels.

[Little Nemo]

with the exception of Tennis Mixed Doubles, there are no sports that I can think of which are combined men/women.

I believe Rifle and Yachting are two Olympic events in which men and women compete directly. I heard this once as the answer to a trivia question.

[Rog668]

OK, screw my old question, this brings up another:

Why is it that the "asian chick" from ESPN2 pool is the single most recognized female sports figure in the world, anyway? EVERYONE has at least SEEN the asian chick once...

She doesn't suck though..

[Una Persson]

[quote]Originally posted by blessedwolf

Originally posted by Sam Stone
golf (which is the only thing in the world which could bring together Republicans and Lesbians, but that's a whole 'nother thread)

Hey! What about Republican lesbians, like moi?

[silent_rob]

Originally posted by dhanson
I've been playing pool competitively for years. I've played with some of the best in the world, both male and female. And trust me, it's not even close...they can't beat the men at the highest levels.

I don't follow billiards or snooker as much as I used to. My dad has always been very into pool (playing and watching). I wonder if this could be because of the stigma of women hanging out in pool halls. Just a hypothesis here, but don't most guys start earlier because they go and play in the pool halls and such when they are younger. That's how my dad got started. Even though it's changing now, girls hanging around in pool halls has generally been frowned upon by their parents in the past, whereas with boys it was much more acceptible and thus they started earlier. Now pool halls are not considered as unsavory as before. It's family entertainment.
My mother remembers when she couldn't go into pubs. And then when she could, women still had their own side. Something about women seeing men drunk. And that wasn't that long ago (late 50's, early 60's). So women generally didn't have the opportunity to play at a younger age.
This is just a guess, mind you. I don't know if this is true. I'm just making a guess based on what dhanson said, which from what I've seen seems to be the case.

[Sam Stone]

Almost all of the top women have played pool since they were small children. Loree Jon Jones had a special raised track built around her pool table at home so she could play at the age of 7. She won the women's U.S. Open at age 14. And her highest run ever in straight pool is 82 balls.

A good college-level male straight pool player can run 100 balls on a regular basis. I started playing pool seriously when I was about 28, and within three years could run that many.

I don't know why we have to always treat women and men as identical. They clearly aren't. Each sex has its own strengths and weaknesses. Male and Female brains function in different ways. In my experience, women are better at multitasking, and men are better at 'deep focus' activities. Given that our societal evolution required women to take care of all the details while men hunted, it makes sense that our brains should evolve this way. So perhaps we should learn to celebrate our differences rather than try to be equal in all respects.

[Little Nemo]

Why is it that the "asian chick" from ESPN2 pool is the single most recognized female sports figure in the world, anyway? EVERYONE has at least SEEN the asian chick once...

Not everyone. I'd never heard of her until I read this thread and I didn't recognize her name when dhanson mentioned it. And as far as I recall, I've never seen her picture.

On the other hand, while I also don't watch tennis, gymnastics, or figure skating, there are a number of women athletes in these sports who I've heard of and would probably recognize if I saw.

[Lance Turbo]

{Side Note}

Womwwn and men compete side by side in dog sled racing. Libby Riddles and Susan Butcher have both won the Iditarod. (Butcher won it 4 times) But, like reining horse, mentioned above, the animals do most of the work.

[lolagranola]

I used to work in a pool hall that participated in a league, sent players to Vegas (who often won money) and had tons of pool tournaments. Not professional players, but really good ones.

IMHO, the best players, men or women, could compete against each other.

I did find that men who weren't very good players were good about competing with the good players. Women who weren't very good only wanted to play with other women players (and by women players, they meant bad players, although that wasn't always the case). We actually managed to appease them by paying out for the top lady player in a tournament. This went well as long as one of the top lady players weren't playing, because they would take first or second prize, plus top lady.

[aaronhalf]

Hey I'm not arguing with you that women's pool isn't competitive as a whole...yet. However, the high run for Women's straight pool is 158 not 89...while this still isn't close to the men and wasn't in a pro-event, the fact is most of the men's records aren't in pro events either and most women don't play straight pool. I think it is mostly a cultural difference between men and women. Most women don't start playing until later and have a lot more to worry about than playing a "man's" game. As for the "muscle" shots, it is misconception that either the break or force follow require strength beyond what a 10 year old can muster. They are both way more about precision. Jasmin Oaschan has statistically the most consistent break in pool out of men AND women...this was in a special that ESPN ran on her before a match. In most of her matches, she AVERAGES 2+ balls on the break. I am only playfully arguing here...and only because my girlfriend is one of the best pool shots I have ever seen. She is one of the few girls I have ever met that take the game as seriously as a guy. I have personally watched her run 6 racks in a row of 9 ball...on a 9ft table. That is why I say it may be a cultural thing...if women actually put the time in that men do, I think they could just as easily kick our asses.

[John Mace]

Originally Posted by aaronhalf

Hey I'm not arguing with you...

Good. Because no one has been waiting around for 12 years for an argument!

[Tangent]

Welcome to the boards, aaronhalf.

Originally Posted by aaronhalf

However, the high run for Women's straight pool is 158 not 89...

Seeing as how the last post in this thread prior to yours was made 12 years ago, maybe the 89 number was accurate way back then?

[Gagundathar]

Is this what we would call 'Zombie Pool'?

[Mahaloth]

Yeah, get him! Sam Stone has been asking for that correction for 12 years! Yeah!

[Rigamarole]

Because men are better at everything. It doesn't matter whether it's something that takes brawn, brains, or any kind of skill you can imagine. The top-performing males will always blow the top-performing females out of the water. It's not even a contest.

[Der Trihs]

Originally Posted by Rigamarole

Because men are better at everything. It doesn't matter whether it's something that takes brawn, brains, or any kind of skill you can imagine. The top-performing males will always blow the top-performing females out of the water. It's not even a contest.

I dont know if you are serious or joking, but that argument fails because it mixes two standards together. Comparing "top performing men and women" is not the same as comparing men and women, in general. Males are more variable than females, so they tend to produce more of the best and worst and go farther to the extremes; men produce more geniuses & champions, but there are also more men who are mentally disabled, crippled, insane, or just die young (including before birth). Competitions are typically designed to pick the very top performers and put everyone else in the "loser" category; this artificially makes men look better because it highlights that tiny percentage of men who are at one end of the scale. Even if women as a group are as good or better at something than men as a group, that kind of competition will tend to produce male champions.

[Rigamarole]

Originally Posted by Der Trihs

I dont know if you are serious or joking, but that argument fails because it mixes two standards together. Comparing "top performing men and women" is not the same as comparing men and women, in general. Males are more variable than females, so they tend to produce more of the best and worst and go farther to the extremes; men produce more geniuses & champions, but there are also more men who are mentally disabled, crippled, insane, or just die young (including before birth). Competitions are typically designed to pick the very top performers and put everyone else in the "loser" category; this artificially makes men look better because it highlights that tiny percentage of men who are at one end of the scale. Even if women as a group are as good or better at something than men as a group, that kind of competition will tend to produce male champions.

That's the standard line they give you when they indoctrinate you to believe in the equality agenda, but where's the evidence?

[Dereknocue67]

Men and women in the same pool leads to canoodling.

[Mijin]

I think in this case it is mostly a matter of the number of people playing.

If you look at sports like snooker, darts and chess, where there are few obvious advantages to being male, it's true that women generally can't compete against the men.
However, in all these sports the best women can often hold women's titles for a looong time. This suggests that few women are playing at the professional level.
Most sports go through a period where they are dominated by one or two guys, then if the sport takes off, there's a "modern era" of competitive play. I think, in terms of women playing, many sports are not in the modern era yet.

Originally Posted by Der Trihs

Males are more variable than females, so they tend to produce more of the best and worst and go farther to the extremes; men produce more geniuses & champions, but there are also more men who are mentally disabled, crippled, insane, or just die young (including before birth). Competitions are typically designed to pick the very top performers and put everyone else in the "loser" category; this artificially makes men look better because it highlights that tiny percentage of men who are at one end of the scale.

Further to this, I think there are still important cultural differences.

There is a pressure for men to be successful and ambitious that I don't think is quite the same for women. Women are attracted to successful/ambitious men, and men often judge each other in terms of what they own or what they've done.
And, conversely, it's still seen as less weird for a guy to get super-obsessive about something in a bid to be #1.
Attitudes are changing but I think it's still there.

[Ulfreida]

Originally Posted by Rigamarole

That's the standard line they give you when they indoctrinate you to believe in the equality agenda, but where's the evidence?

I learned this in a standard intro psych class, it had, y'know, graphs, charts, stats. It's true. I don't see where it is a feminist argument. There's a developmental, chromosomal hypothesis for this. I am too lazy to look it up. Females as a group don't have the extremes that males do, and I highly doubt that this is a purely human trait, it's way too deep for that.

Anecdotally, I also notice that male people have a stronger tendency to be single-minded, narrow-field types who focus on one thing at a time. Wide-field awareness/multi-tasking is a highly developed function in most women, essential in taking care of children for example. You can see how this trait would be detrimental to becoming the best pool player in the world. Culture reinforces but I don't believe it originates with culture.

Women dominate long-distance open-water swimming, don't they?

[clairobscur]

Originally Posted by Little Nemo

Not everyone. I'd never heard of her until I read this thread and I didn't recognize her name when dhanson mentioned it. And as far as I recall, I've never seen her picture.

On the other hand, while I also don't watch tennis, gymnastics, or figure skating, there are a number of women athletes in these sports who I've heard of and would probably recognize if I saw.

Same for me.

[Shawn1767]

So, why are awards for Best Actress/Actor separated in major award competitions? That drives me nuts. First, it's a pretty subjective award, secondly, are we honestly saying that there is no way a woman could ever "out-act" a man, so they have to be put in separate categories???

[Mahaloth]

Originally Posted by Shawn1767

So, why are awards for Best Actress/Actor separated in major award competitions? That drives me nuts. First, it's a pretty subjective award, secondly, are we honestly saying that there is no way a woman could ever "out-act" a man, so they have to be put in separate categories???

I think they are acknowledging the differences between female and male roles/characters and picking the "best" one of each. Note that directors, cinematographers, and other roles are all mixed together.

[Anachronism]

Originally Posted by Der Trihs

I dont know if you are serious or joking, but that argument fails because it mixes two standards together. Comparing "top performing men and women" is not the same as comparing men and women, in general. Males are more variable than females, so they tend to produce more of the best and worst and go farther to the extremes; men produce more geniuses & champions, but there are also more men who are mentally disabled, crippled, insane, or just die young (including before birth). Competitions are typically designed to pick the very top performers and put everyone else in the "loser" category; this artificially makes men look better because it highlights that tiny percentage of men who are at one end of the scale. Even if women as a group are as good or better at something than men as a group, that kind of competition will tend to produce male champions.

I agree with you that there is more variability in men but even at the middle of the pack level men dominate in many sports. I am a mediocre 5k (~21-22 min) runner and in most local races only a handful of women finish ahead of me. I finished 31st in my age group in a recent race but I would have been number 4 among the women in my age group. Any kind of local running races or triathlons I look at the upper/middle of the pack men are usually competitive with the top women. Middle of the pack vs middle of the pack men are ahead of women by quite a bit.

I certainly don't think men are better at everything and IMO women are probably better at a lot of things that can't easily be measured or timed. And for the record I love women in and out of sports, women rock

[CurtC]

Originally Posted by Sam Stone

And trust me, it's not even close. Jeanette Lee (the 'asian woman' you spoke of) is good, but she's not even the best female on the circuit right now. Allison Fisher is. And trust me, they can't beat the men at the highest levels.

I realize this comment is 12 years ago, but I recall a quote from a great book I read a few years ago. The book is Running the Table, and I highly recommend it for any pool players.

The author was talking about the men/women difference in pool, and noted that Jeanette Lee, while the best female player in the world, wasn't even the best pool player in her own house. Her husband is a better player but isn't good enough to compete professionally.

The other quote I remember was when young Danny was hanging out in the pool halls for endless hours, he had been hustling and beating business men and rich college kids, but then he started getting good enough to take money from fellow hustlers, and felt a little guilty. He asked an older hustler about whether he ever felt guilty like that, and they guy said something like "Yeah, sometimes I feel so guilty that I don't try to fuck his girlfriend afterwards. Look kid, you're a good shot, but if you're going to make it at this, you've got to get in touch with your inner motherfucker."

[Der Trihs]

Originally Posted by Anachronism

I certainly don't think men are better at everything and IMO women are probably better at a lot of things that can't easily be measured or timed.

Or just aren't applicable to sports. Women are more resistant to disease and parasites, but who wants to watch competitive parasitic infestation?

[Colibri]

Moved to the Game Room from GQ.

Colibri
General Questions Moderator

[Double Foolscap]

Originally Posted by ;691730

But then, with the exception of Tennis Mixed Doubles, there are no sports that I can think of which are combined men/women.

Tiddlywinks. But looking at the most recent global ratings, the top woman player is #28 overall.

[FoieGrasIsEvil]

Originally Posted by Una Persson

Hey! What about Republican lesbians, like moi?

So, 12 years later...are you still a Republican lesbian? Inquiring minds want to know!

[Lochdale]

Originally Posted by Der Trihs

I dont know if you are serious or joking, but that argument fails because it mixes two standards together. Comparing "top performing men and women" is not the same as comparing men and women, in general. Males are more variable than females, so they tend to produce more of the best and worst and go farther to the extremes; men produce more geniuses & champions, but there are also more men who are mentally disabled, crippled, insane, or just die young (including before birth). Competitions are typically designed to pick the very top performers and put everyone else in the "loser" category; this artificially makes men look better because it highlights that tiny percentage of men who are at one end of the scale. Even if women as a group are as good or better at something than men as a group, that kind of competition will tend to produce male champions.

I rarely agree with you but this was very well put.