|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aliens from outer space?
I've read sporadic updates on these cells, anyone know if the "scientists" involved are legitimate academics, and if so why can't the matter of the origin of these things be resolved quicker? If something "living" object is from outer space, shouldn't proving it or disproving it be rather easy?
|
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The 'controversy' is ongoing. Here's a thread on the stuff from a couple months ago: Did people ever figure out what the red rain in Kerala was? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I remember the old thread...it was kind of funny to see people arguing that occam's razor should push us to the "meteorite hit a flock of bats, and it's blood falling" as the most logical explanation.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd hate aliens to come from this planet.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's like finding odd-looking fish in the middle of the Atlantic ocean. Why speculate that it came from the Pacific, when it was found in an ocean known to produce many types of fish? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
From the article, the evidence that they were reproducing was that some of them were cut open and found to have smaller "buds" inside them. Color me completely, entirely underwhelmed: I've seen soap bubbles with smaller soap bubbles inside them, but that doesn't mean that soap bubbles reproduce. If they want to prove reproduction, the logical approach is to take a sample of them, count the number of thingies, wait a while, and then count them again. The fact that this is not mentioned suggests to me that either this was not attempted, which would be bad, or that it was attempted but the results were negative so they didn't mention them, which is worse.
__________________
Time travels in divers paces with divers persons. --As You Like It, III:ii:328 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|