What is the historical evidence people were paid in salt?

Where is the historical evidence that people were paid in salt? It’s something I hear thrown around as something ‘everyone knows’, and everyone knows most of those bits of knowledge are crap.

No, don’t mention the word ‘salary’ unless you can find a cite that outdoes the American Heritage Dictionary, as quoted here*:

Emphasis mine.

*(Or, perhaps, unless you really believe that the popularity of the term ‘pin money’ means people were paid in pins. ;))

i know he’s been wrong before, but Cecil claims that roman soldiers were paid in salt.

I thought the term ‘pin money’ came from when people manufactured small quantities of metal pins by hand, outside of their normal working hours (and independently of their main job), and therefore ‘pin money’ was therefore (somewhat)disposable income. Did I get this wrong?

::points finger::
HERETIC!! Somebody get some wood and some torches.

Apparently.

From the Online Etymology Dictionary:

fair enough.

In this matter, I’d bet on the AHD before Cecil. Maybe samclem can weigh in with what the OED says; I understand he has access to that.

Word origins aside, is there any good evidence that anyone ever made an official practice of paying wages using salt? That is, barter for salt doesn’t count: Salt has to have been used as a store of value, the role gold usually assumes.

Most Universities have access to the online version. Including mine.

Don’t think you’re going to get anything more authoritative than that.

Oooh, I go to University and post authoritative information! Lah de dah!

Was this supposed to be humor?

MikeS
<bolding mine>

Does this mean actual payment in salt or does it mean money to buy salt? I can read this both ways.

According to Wikipedia, the citation first appears in Pliny’s Natural History – that’s the cite you’rwe looking for, Pliny was an Ancient Roman, but not as ancient as the practice, so you can reasonably ask if he got it right. Here’s the relevant portion of the Wiki entry:

Welcome to the board, glateherrny. May I suggest that you read up on the purposes of the different forums here? This one, General Questions, is for factual questions and answers. [MikeS] factually stated that he is associated with a university and had access to OED, which had been previously requested. Then he posted that information.

I hope so, it made me laugh! Rather Python-esque in tone. “Look at Mr. I-have-the-correct-answer-to-the-question. Whoop de do Mr. My-Mum-didn’t-lock-me-in-the-cellar, just a regular Dr. Bloody Bronowski aren’t you?” all done by Cleese playing the BBC interview guy on the raised platform (you know the set I’m talking about) - “We have with us today the foremost authority on tin mining in Britain”, “Coal mining”, “WHAT?”, “Er, coal mining. I do coal mining”, “OOOOH, Coal mining is it? Well…” etc.

I’m sorry, what was the question?

For what it’s worth, that’s how I took it as well. :slight_smile:

MikeS: That settles the origin of the word ‘salary’ to my satisfaction. Thank you.

glateherrny: Ha! :smiley:

So, what about the other front? My Google search only turns up the familiar canard about the word ‘salary’, which we’ve just been over, and is a bit light on the evidence.

Derleth – read my post, #11

Oh, damn. Sorry I missed it.

So, is it all down to Pliny getting it wrong? That seems plausible, at least to me.

No, no, no! It was all a misunderstanding. They were paid in vegetables, and the word was celery. :stuck_out_tongue:

Now THAT"S funny. :slight_smile:

I think I agree with Pliny making the error as all my best etymology sources agree with the OED.