The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-21-2006, 03:20 PM
diggleblop diggleblop is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,870
Which person can speak the most languages?

Who is the person known to speak the most languages and how many does he/she speak?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 09-21-2006, 03:36 PM
Shagnasty Shagnasty is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 20,633
Before you can answer the question, there needs to be criteria for how well each language needs to be spoken before it counts.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-21-2006, 03:51 PM
Doctor Who Doctor Who is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
I agree with Shagnasty. Here, however, is Wiki's list of polyglots. That should get us started.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2006, 04:11 PM
John Mace John Mace is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shagnasty
Before you can answer the question, there needs to be criteria for how well each language needs to be spoken before it counts.
...and what constitutes a "language".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2006, 05:01 PM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 20,916
We also need clarification whether the person needs to be currently alive. The OP was in the present tense, but that might not have been meant to be restrictive.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-25-2006, 07:10 PM
diggleblop diggleblop is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,870
Yeah, I mean which person (currently alive and on record) can speak the most languages. Language meaning, a way different people communicate verbally with each other.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-25-2006, 08:26 PM
John Mace John Mace is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by diggleblop
Language meaning, a way different people communicate verbally with each other.
That's a terrible definition of "language", but it's your OP so if that's the question you're asking, good luck with it. I doubt there is a factual answer, though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-25-2006, 08:58 PM
silenus silenus is offline
Hoc nomen meum verum non est.
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 36,535
I'll start the bidding with Sir Richard F. Burton (1821–1890) - 29 European, African and Asian languages.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-25-2006, 09:14 PM
Doctor Who Doctor Who is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by silenus
I'll start the bidding with Sir Richard F. Burton (1821–1890) - 29 European, African and Asian languages.
...

Look back at the OP's clarification. Richard Burton (as per your post) is most definitely dead.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-25-2006, 09:16 PM
Bryan Ekers Bryan Ekers is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
I speak fluent Rigellian.

I'm speaking it now.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-25-2006, 09:20 PM
silenus silenus is offline
Hoc nomen meum verum non est.
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 36,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Who
...

Look back at the OP's clarification. Richard Burton (as per your post) is most definitely dead.
"I got better!" - RFB
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-25-2006, 09:33 PM
Scylla Scylla is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by silenus
I'll start the bidding with Sir Richard F. Burton (1821–1890) - 29 European, African and Asian languages.

Damn you! I know that! Do you have any idea how long I've been waiting to use that fact in a discussion.


Shit.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-25-2006, 09:37 PM
diggleblop diggleblop is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mace
That's a terrible definition of "language", but it's your OP so if that's the question you're asking, good luck with it. I doubt there is a factual answer, though.

Are you serious? I mean, number two of Websters says exactly what I stated:

2 a : form or manner of verbal expression;


Please explain how you think it's "terrible" definition. Also, please explain how you don't know what I mean? Speak to me in a language I can understand.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-25-2006, 09:43 PM
Dr. Drake Dr. Drake is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
I nominate myself, but I am 100% certain a large number of dopers can do better.

I speak one language natively, three more fairly fluently, a fifth conversationally, and #s 6 & 7 haltingly. I can communicate at a fairly elementary level (say, a year or two of college language X) in about three more, for a total of:

one
four
five
seven
(or)
ten

depending on how you count. I assume you're going for speaking ability rather than reading, which is a different ballgame. (I know people who can read over a hundred different languages, though I am not one of them!)

But all of these languages are Indo-European (and thus have similar grammars and a large overlap in vocabulary). It really is true that the more languages you learn, the easier they are to pick up. #2 was hard. #3 was sort of hard. #4 was pretty easy. Oh, and I have an obvious American accent in all of them.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-25-2006, 10:24 PM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 20,916
It's polite to read links before you post. Doctor Who's Wiki link lists:

Quote:
Ziad Fazah born June 10, 1954, claimed to speak 63 languages.

Rolf Theil Endresen, Norwegian linguistics professor (over 50 languages)

Carlos do Amaral Freire has mastered more than a hundred languages, published translations from 60 languages, but is a fluent speaker of 30. He still studies one or two new languages every two years.

István Dabi, Hungarian translator, translated from 103 languages

Ferenc Kemény (Francis Kemeni), Hungarian translator, understands 40 languages, writes in 24 languages out of them, speaks 12 languages out of them
All of them are listed above Sir Richard Burton.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-25-2006, 10:31 PM
ThisSpaceForRent ThisSpaceForRent is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
My ex siter-in-law can converse fluetently in english, croatian, bosnian, russian, sapanish, french, italian and japanees...and she is a REAL NASA rocket scientist.

does she win?

tsfr
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-25-2006, 10:38 PM
Ruken Ruken is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 1,863
Quote:
Originally Posted by diggleblop
Are you serious? I mean, number two of Websters says exactly what I stated:

2 a : form or manner of verbal expression;


Please explain how you think it's "terrible" definition. Also, please explain how you don't know what I mean? Speak to me in a language I can understand.
The problem here is how do you define one language from another? Are Serbian and Croation different languages? How about the "dialects" of Chinese? Standard American English (if there is such a thing) and Black Vernacular English? That definition is just fine for defining language in general, but it doesn't do us much good in trying to figure out how many languages someone speaks, because we don't know what counts as a separate language.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-25-2006, 10:45 PM
diggleblop diggleblop is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,870
A language in the sense of what I'm asking is this, if one group of people speak to each other and understand each other, that's a language. If they speak the same language to a group of people living say...30 miles away from them and that group doesn't understand them, then that must mean that group speaks a different language.

If the actual words don't make sense to another group living in the same area, then it's is considered a different language. Dialect doesn't count. What I mean by that is, British and American people both speak English and a lot of words may be altered, but it's still English.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-25-2006, 11:49 PM
Dr. Drake Dr. Drake is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase
It's polite to read links before you post.
Exapno Mapcase: I did read the link, thank you. I apologize if my post was rude; that was certainly not my intent.

I was trying to respond taking into account both the OP and post #2. The Wikipedia article only lists "highest claims," and in most cases it doesn't attempt to define how the languages are counted and thus whether they meet the criterion of the OP: actually speaking the languages.

I think most professional lingusts could reasonably claim a pretty high place on that list. I was thinking of V. V. Ivanov when I mentioned someone who could read over a hundred; I would back him against István Dabi in a translation fight any day. I suspect he is also fluent in at least a dozen, but I don't know how to verify that.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-26-2006, 12:01 AM
John Mace John Mace is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by diggleblop
Are you serious? I mean, number two of Websters says exactly what I stated:

2 a : form or manner of verbal expression;


Please explain how you think it's "terrible" definition. Also, please explain how you don't know what I mean? Speak to me in a language I can understand.
Because it does not address the thorniest issue of all-- the divison between a dialect and a language. If I speak Croatian and Serbian, does that count as two languages? If I can sign ASL, that is not included in your definition.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-26-2006, 06:28 AM
Hari Seldon Hari Seldon is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
I heard a guy interviewed who claimed to speak about 100. He said it got easier after the first 30.

There was a linguist named Kenneth Pike (now deceased, I believe) who put on a language-learning demo at the Modern Language Association every year. I didn't witness it, but it was described to me that he sat at a table with a native speaker of a language he didn't know and there were a few natural artifacts on the table: an apple, a stick, a stone, that sort of thing. After a half hour he was carrying on a simple conversation with him.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-26-2006, 10:12 AM
CookingWithGas CookingWithGas is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Tysons Corner VA
Posts: 8,979
I know Fortran, PL/1, SNOBOL, ALGOL, 360 Assembly, Ada83, C, C++, and Java.

Do they count?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-26-2006, 09:06 PM
tiltypig tiltypig is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
My coworker doesn't rank anywhere near the polyglots from wikipedia, but I'm still very impressed by him.
I work at a translation company, and he has done QA work for us (so works at a professional level) in:
French
Italian
German
Spanish
Portuguese
Dutch
Danish
Swedish
Norwegian
Finnish
Greek
Russian
Turkish

plus he is a native English speaker.
I believe he may also speak a few, like Latin and Welsh, that we don't handle so I don't know about.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-27-2006, 03:14 AM
Alive At Both Ends Alive At Both Ends is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by diggleblop
A language in the sense of what I'm asking is this, if one group of people speak to each other and understand each other, that's a language. If they speak the same language to a group of people living say...30 miles away from them and that group doesn't understand them, then that must mean that group speaks a different language.
The problem with this is that there aren't nice sharp geographical boundaries between languages. People living near the border between two countries speaking different languages often understand the people living a few miles away on the other side of the border quite well. If A and B can understand each other, and B and C can also understand each other, it does not imply that A could understand C. The differences add up and eventually you have an undeniably different language, but A would say B spoke the same language as him, and B would say the same of C.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-27-2006, 06:55 AM
Nava Nava is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by diggleblop
A language in the sense of what I'm asking is this, if one group of people speak to each other and understand each other, that's a language. If they speak the same language to a group of people living say...30 miles away from them and that group doesn't understand them, then that must mean that group speaks a different language.

If the actual words don't make sense to another group living in the same area, then it's is considered a different language. Dialect doesn't count. What I mean by that is, British and American people both speak English and a lot of words may be altered, but it's still English.
According to your first paragraph, Jamaican and Floridian appear to be different languages. OTOH, Spanish and Italian aren't, but I wouldn't say that where any Italians or Hispanics other than yours truly can hear it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.