The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-13-2006, 09:36 PM
beckwall beckwall is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Diagnosing knee problem - CT vs. MRI?

OK, so I'm seeing the PA on Wed. to discuss on-going symptoms in my left leg. I really don't think it's a blown knee, cuz there are other nerve-y type things going on, including weird sensations in my foot.

I hate MRIs. But if it will give me a better idea, including perhaps vascular involvement, I'll do it. But if I can get by with a CT to see if my knee is wonky, then I'd like to do it that way.

I actually chose to see my doc's PA because he is amazingly thorough and caring. My ortho surgeon just wants to know when I'll be ready for another hip replacement. No offense to doctors on board here.

Anyone have pros and cons to offer on subject of diagnostic powers of CT vs MRI?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 11-13-2006, 09:54 PM
Askance Askance is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,271
Why on earth are you asking us? Go with whichever technique your doctor says has the best "diagnostic power" in this case. If you don't trust his/her advice, change doctors.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2006, 12:08 AM
beckwall beckwall is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
I was asking because it's called "general questions" and I thought I might get an educated reply vs. a snarky opinion. So far, no luck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2006, 02:39 AM
Nava Nava is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
They sort of show opposite things. Cat-scans (CT) use Xrays to create 3d images of the solid parts of the body; MRI uses magnetism to create 3D images of the water in the body, that is, of the soft tissues. (This is a simplification etc etc)

So which one to use depends on what your doctor is looking for. An MRI wouldn't be as useful to find broken bones as a regular Xray or a CT; OTOH if you're looking for something "broken" in soft tissue, the Xray based techniques wouldn't be any good.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2006, 02:04 PM
Neur0mancer. Neur0mancer. is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Knee CT vs MR

Quote:
Originally Posted by beckwall
OK, so I'm seeing the PA on Wed. to discuss on-going symptoms in my left leg. I really don't think it's a blown knee, cuz there are other nerve-y type things going on, including weird sensations in my foot.

I hate MRIs. But if it will give me a better idea, including perhaps vascular involvement, I'll do it. But if I can get by with a CT to see if my knee is wonky, then I'd like to do it that way.

Anyone have pros and cons to offer on subject of diagnostic powers of CT vs MRI?
CT of the knee has very limited uses, and is used primarily for evaluation of complicated fractures. MRI allows you to evaluate the soft tissues - vessels, nerves, tendons, ligaments, menisci, etc.

I am sorry that you hate MRIs, but that is without a doubt the way to go.

P.S. I am a radiologist
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.