|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
No Libby, Libby, Libby on the stand.
Defense counsel has stated that he's not going to call Libby nor Cheney to testify for the defense in Libby's trial.
After all the bluster, all the grandstanding, we're not going to get to hear sworn testimony from Libby or Cheney. It is an interesting piece of manuvering by defense counsel, who had represented until just recently, that both would take the stand. I'm guessing that closing arguments will be replete with objections from the government while defense counsel argues, without evidence, that Libby just plain forgot when he talked to the investigators and the grand jury. In addition, there's the issue of the relevance of all the evidence and cross examinations, that set the stage for the faulty memory defense, only to have no relevance because Libby won't be testifying. It was a shrewd move by defense counsel to walk that thin line between offering evidence that shows he MIGHT have forgotten, but no evidence that he actually did. The judge has taken under advisement the issues of just how far defense can go in putting evidence of Libby's busyness (busyocity? busyable?) without having to put his guy on the stand. But mostly I'm just pissed because I wanted Libby and Cheney subjected to cross examination by Fitzgerald. Bastards stole my fun. |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yea, mine too. I chuckled at the one witness who was testifying about how forgetful Libby was, that ostensibly, you could have a conversation w/him about a subject and he'd act like it had only just occurred to him hours/days later. Saturday Night LIve did a not so funny skecth about that sort of thing "Mr. Short Term Memory" or something like that. I forget.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
He shouldn't have stood under that pear tree.
Enjoy, Steven |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yesterday afternoon, Jane Hamsher, Marcy Wheeler, and Jeralyn Merritt had a discussion on PoliticsTV, mostly about the pros and cons of Cheney and Libby taking the stand. It's about 9 minutes long, was informative (all three women have blogged extensively about the case, and Wheeler's published a book about it) and entertaining, and can be found here.
I'm disappointed that neither Shooter nor Scooter will take the stand, but I'm not at all surprised. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't juries tend to take a defendant's non-testifying as evidence of guilt?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That being said, I think the jury will be surprised that Libby won't testify about his "faulty memory". |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
If I were on the jury, I would be inclined to say "Oh, he's so busy and important and has so many responsibilities, he couldn't remember. Poor baby.
"
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was looking forward to watching it from the well.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
-Joe |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
A saddass setup for superior pardon down the line.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did I hear somewhere that Libby couldn't use the forgetfulness defense if he didn't testify?
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
-Joe |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can a person really act as an effective chief of staff to the vice president of the United States if he has a poor memory.
VP Cheney: "Scooter, I told you to inform the president not to mention the African yellow-cake in his State of the Union address. What the fuck?" Scooter Libby: "Oops." Last edited by Frostillicus; 02-14-2007 at 09:59 PM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|