See bottom of post for important links
It’s an Urban Myth that the Twin Towers Collapsed.
The Twin Towers Did Not Collapse,
They Were Pulverized Into Dust.
Look at the following photos:
Where’s the hundreds of tons of steel beams? Each tower was a 1/4 mile tall!
On top of that, where’s the thousands of desks, chairs, bookcases,
computers, xerox machines, water coolers, filing cabinets, doors, sinks, toilets, etc?
source: http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/HTR/web-content/Pages/HTRHome.html
BEFORE:
AFTER:
========================================
On the afternoon of 9/11/01 the “rubble pile” left from WTC1 is essentially non-existent.
WTC7 can be seen in the distance, revealing the photo was taken before 5:20 PM that day.
========================================
**
These documentary excerpts** reveal only one filing cabinet to have been found.
No doors, no phones, no computers, and no doorknobs:
http://thewebfairy.com/911/h-effect/doorknob.htm
========================================
**The material did not break through the subbasements: **
No debris in subbasements:
Source: Star Wars Beam Weapon 1
PATH train was not crushed:
Mall (1st subbasement) not crushed (photos filed 9/19/01):
Original High Resolution: http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image311.jpg
Original High Resolution: http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image312.jpg
Empty hole in subbasement under WTC 2 (photo filed 9/18/01):
Original High Resolution: http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image300.jpg
========================================
**The material did not spread out over the surrounding area: **
Mostly unburned paper mixes with the top half of the Twin Towers. As seen a block away, a large portion of the towers remains suspended in air. This dust looks deeper than one inch. Most of the curb looks filled in.
========================================
Examine the following three pictures.
Notice any similar characteristics?
**Mount Saint Helens - Erupting Volcano - Massive Energy Release:
Nevada Desert - Nuclear Blast - Massive Energy Release:**
Original High Resolution: http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/trouble/26_nuke1.jpg
WTC - Massive Energy Release:
========================================
**
The disintegration of the steel core caught on film:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVRh4U2BlhQ
**
WTC 3: Huge gash. Building material “missing”
========================================
**
WTC 4: Clean vertical cut on the north wing.
Building material on other side of cut “missing”**
Original High Resolution: Photo Storage
Yellow box below locates north wing of WTC 4. As can be seen, the wing was “cut” in line with the north face of WTC 2:
========================================
**
WTC 5 / WTC 6: Round Cylindrical Holes. Building material “missing”.
Mid-section of WTC 6 “missing”**
Original High Resolution: Photo Storage
========================================
What Toasted These Cars?
See here for much more: Star Wars Beam Weapon 5
**Cars along FDR drive were randomly toasted. These cars are at least 1/2 mile away from the WTC.
Note the waviness of the tire tracks. What happened?
Did one car run under the other during the event or were they stacked after the event?
The marks in the pavement suggest they were pushed to the side of the road.
What was this thing across the street? Was it a car? Was it a van?
What caused that line of burn marks on the hood of the car in the foreground on the right?
In the left foreground, the remains of a vehicle sit atop a white sedan.
Are we looking at the front or the back end?
It looks like the front end and if it is, its engine is missing.
We can see daylight through the wheel well.
Why would the front of this fire truck wilt?
The front half of car 2723 is toasted, but check out the new wax job on the back.
Notice the missing front door handle and the untouched back door handle.
**
**
Does This Look Like a “Collapse”?**
========================================
========================================
**
Dr Judy Wood, former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University,**
files official Request for Correction (RFC) with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
citing fraud and deception in the 9/11 NIST Report.
Dr Wood is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart.
See her website for her paper co-written with Dr Morgan Reynolds entitled
“Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)”:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com
They show clear evidence that the World Trade Center was destroyed by a Directed Energy Weapon (DEW).
Dr Judy Wood, former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University,
files official Request for Correction (RFC) with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) citing fraud and deception in the 9/11 NIST Report.
Dr Wood is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart.
See her website for her paper co-written with Dr Morgan Reynolds entitled
“Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)”:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com
They show clear evidence that the World Trade Center was destroyed by a Directed Energy Weapon (DEW).
Download Dr Wood’s latest radio interviews, where she walks you through her new paper (still under construction) “Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt”:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/#news
Read through the RFC information in the “news” section and learn that NIST contracted with
Applied Research Associates (ARA) for the 9/11 NIST report.
Not only is ARA a manufacturer of directed-energy weapon technology,
but are also a founding sponsor of Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
DEPS, founded in 1999, put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11.
An excerpt from this newsletter is as follows:
“Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we’re at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry.”
Videos:
Judy Wood at Cooper Union, NYC
September 10, 2006
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7643791621546831344
Judy Wood speaking at the forum 9/11 Search for Truth in Seattle
October 28, 2006
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8344867178250739868
For the Best in Uncensored 9/11 Research:
http://www.911researchers.com