The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-11-2007, 12:23 PM
ralph124c ralph124c is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
When Did Welding Displace Rivets in Ships?

I always like the 19th-century look of rivets on a ship hull. I understand that rivets are pretty labor-intensive, and are not the best way to join two plates (the stress concentrates at the rivet points). So when did welding displace the rivets?
Also, in battleships, i've heard there were several instances of shells striking a rivet head, which has then driven into the ships 9causing damage)-did this really happen?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 06-11-2007, 12:31 PM
Hypno-Toad Hypno-Toad is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
I know that in WWII ships were being welded, but that's as far back as I know. I suspect it was an inter-war development.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-11-2007, 12:37 PM
Hypno-Toad Hypno-Toad is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Clocked out on the edit.

As for rivet heads being turned into projectiles, that could happen too. Sometimes, it would just be a piece of the ships structure. When a piece of thick armor takes a big hit, it can knock off a chunk of armor on the inside of the ship. This is called spalling. This is a problem for tank crews as well. Some tanks have "spall nets" lining the crew compartments to help prevent and reduce the damage from spalls. WWI tank crews actually wore protective goggles and chainmail face guards because of the tiny little spalls created by rifle and machine guns hitting the armor around their firing ports.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-11-2007, 12:45 PM
Thrash the Almighty Thrash the Almighty is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
It was a gradual process that began in the 1930's.

From http://www.welding.com/history_of_welding2.shtml#8

"Stud welding was developed in 1930 at the New York Navy Yard, specifically for attaching wood decking over a metal surface. Stud welding became popular in the shipbuilding and construction industries."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-11-2007, 01:14 PM
Polycarp Polycarp is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: A better place to be
Posts: 26,718
Welding in lieu of riveting became the common practice during World War II, when the speed with which a ship could be safely and properly constructed became a prime concern. We were effectively having to replace our Navy while in the midst of war, and the speed with which we could build every ship counted. I don't have good cites to provide on this, but I believe you'll find some stuff on the decision in looking up Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox or Fleet Admiral Ernest J. King.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-11-2007, 01:30 PM
Stranger On A Train Stranger On A Train is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
The development of shielded arc welding electrodes by A.O. Smith Company in the early 'Thirties was paramount to being able to weld large steel structures without cracking and corrosion problems from inclusions due to atmospheric combination of nitrogen and oxygen in the weld bead. The United States had effectively stopped all shipbuilding until the mid-to-late Thirties when it was clear that we'd need to provide transAtlantic logistical support first to Britian and latter for our own forces, and that new techniques and processes in welding would be superior to riveted construction. Here is an article from Time Magazine's archives on welding in WWII-era shipbuilding, and here is an extensive article from GlobalSecurity.org on WWII shipbuilding.

Rivets are also good in shear (although improperly designed rivet joints can display problems with stress concentrations) but not so wonderful in tension and require large lapping joints which add weight and complexity. A good, well designed welded joint (which does require more skill but less labor than welding) will stand up to shear and tension equally well. See Omer Blodgett's Design of Weldments or Design of Welded Structures for technical details on designing good welded structures and joints.

Stranger

Last edited by Stranger On A Train; 06-11-2007 at 01:34 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-11-2007, 03:04 PM
Rocketeer Rocketeer is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
It wasn't quite that easy. Didn't some of the Liberty ships have problems with cracking of the welds in cold Arctic waters?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-11-2007, 03:26 PM
si_blakely si_blakely is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Riveting a ship was pretty risky work, too - handling the hot rivets and hammering both sides.

I seem to recall that when the SS Great Eastern was disassembled, the bodies of a couple of riveters were found in the hull

Si
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-11-2007, 11:41 PM
Tuckerfan Tuckerfan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocketeer
It wasn't quite that easy. Didn't some of the Liberty ships have problems with cracking of the welds in cold Arctic waters?
Yes, but the benefits of welding far outweighed such matters (mind you, many of the ships literally broke apart when the welds cracked).

Modern shipbuilding was basically pioneered in WWII by Kaiser shipyards. They came up with the idea of modular construction for shipbuilding. (This had been used at one point in time in building wooden ships, but had fallen out of fashion when metal ships came about.)

Interestingly enough, welding wasn't the only thing to come out of WWII shipyards. Employer provided health insurance (Kaiser Permamente was started by Kaiser to reduce employee absenteesm during the war.) Kaiser also convinced Howard Hughes to build the Spruce Goose. And the profits Kaiser made during the war funded his abortive entry into the automotive field.
__________________
***Don't ask me, I don't post here any more, and I'm probably not even reading this now.***
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-12-2007, 01:11 AM
Stranger On A Train Stranger On A Train is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckerfan
Yes, but the benefits of welding far outweighed such matters (mind you, many of the ships literally broke apart when the welds cracked).
The weld metal and associated heat affected zone adjacent to the weld have different mechanical properties than the parent metal itself; some contaminants or processes can exacerbate this. Welding is frankly a big pain in the ass, and it takes a much more skilled worker to weld pieces together than to bolt or rivet them. But in the end, welding almost invaribly gives the best permanent joint for materials amenible to welding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckerfan
Modern shipbuilding was basically pioneered in WWII by Kaiser shipyards. They came up with the idea of modular construction for shipbuilding. (This had been used at one point in time in building wooden ships, but had fallen out of fashion when metal ships came about.)
And oddly enough, Kaiser had esssentially no experience in shipbuilding prior to the buildup for WWII; Kaiser's main business was freeway construction and public works projects.

Modular construction was used, in part, because of the problems of welding in overhead positions. Whereas riveting can be done in pretty much any orientation, it's difficult to get a good bead when the weld material tends to flow out of the joint, so it was easier to attempt to modularize parts that could be moved and rotated into an ideal weld position. This led to other advances in inspection and tolerancing (since the parts had to all fit together with minimal adjustment) and probably had a lot to do with the success and reputed high build quality of post-war assembly line manufacturing, particularly in the automotive industry.

Stranger
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-12-2007, 04:39 AM
Mangetout Mangetout is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 52,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by si_blakely
I seem to recall that when the SS Great Eastern was disassembled, the bodies of a couple of riveters were found in the hull
I've heard of stuff like this, but had always dismissed it as UL - is there any truth to it?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-12-2007, 04:51 AM
si_blakely si_blakely is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mangetout
I've heard of stuff like this, but had always dismissed it as UL - is there any truth to it?
According to wikipedia - probably.

Quote:
While it's rumored that a skeleton was found inside the Great Eastern's double hull, the same thing has been said of the Titanic and the Hoover Dam (among others); and inspection hatches in the inner hull would have provided an easy escape. The ship was the subject of one programme in the BBC documentary series Seven Wonders of the Industrial World which repeated the tale about two dead bodies in the hull, including a child worker, presenting it as rumour rather than fact. However, Haunted History implied that the find of the skeleton was indeed factual. One of the narrators of the segment read an article published from the time when the Great Eastern was being dismantled. The article stated that the workers broke into a compartment in the inner shell on the port side, and did find a skeleton. Support for the skeleton find traces back to when the Great Eastern was being constructed, as it was discovered that two of the riveters, a worker and his apprentice, had mysteriously vanished. It was believed that they had been sealed on the inside by accident.
I would guess that they probably fell, rather than got sealed in - at least I would like to think that.

Si
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-12-2007, 07:22 AM
Mangetout Mangetout is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 52,070
Thanks for that. I'd heard a version where a worker fell down into a deep void between outer and inner hull (or between two bulkheads or something) and could not be rescued without significantly destroying part of the ship - even though he was alive and his cries for help could be heard - so they gave up and carried on working - and he could be heard banging on the hull for several days.
-Which of course has plenty of UL features, but the story you cited doesn't sound nearly so implausible.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-12-2007, 07:36 AM
si_blakely si_blakely is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mangetout
Thanks for that. I'd heard a version where a worker fell down into a deep void between outer and inner hull (or between two bulkheads or something) and could not be rescued without significantly destroying part of the ship - even though he was alive and his cries for help could be heard - so they gave up and carried on working - and he could be heard banging on the hull for several days.
-Which of course has plenty of UL features, but the story you cited doesn't sound nearly so implausible.
I think it would be unlikely that someone trapped inside the hull would not be rescued in Victorian times, and (as noted) inspection hatches make being trapped unlikely. But once people were working, you certainly could not make a signal that others would hear. More likely someone fell and died (or maybe was murdered and hidden).

Otherwise, it was a sacrifice to Posiden

(where are you putting the body on your boat, mangetout? - or is it a pound coin under a bulkhead)

Si
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-12-2007, 07:55 AM
Mangetout Mangetout is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 52,070
There's not much room on my boat to hide a body, although a fresh one might make a comfy seat. Interesting you mention the pound coin, because I was already wondering if there was any kind of tradition regarding hiding a coin in the construction - I found a silver sixpence on the beach a couple of weeks ago and thought back then that I might build it into the boat.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-12-2007, 08:13 AM
si_blakely si_blakely is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mangetout
There's not much room on my boat to hide a body, although a fresh one might make a comfy seat. Interesting you mention the pound coin, because I was already wondering if there was any kind of tradition regarding hiding a coin in the construction - I found a silver sixpence on the beach a couple of weeks ago and thought back then that I might build it into the boat.
A coin under the mast was the usual trick.

Maybe put it under the seat.

Si
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-12-2007, 08:38 AM
Bridget Burke Bridget Burke is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 7,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by si_blakely
I think it would be unlikely that someone trapped inside the hull would not be rescued in Victorian times, and (as noted) inspection hatches make being trapped unlikely. But once people were working, you certainly could not make a signal that others would hear. More likely someone fell and died (or maybe was murdered and hidden).

Otherwise, it was a sacrifice to Posiden

(where are you putting the body on your boat, mangetout? - or is it a pound coin under a bulkhead)

Si
I've heard about the "missing riveters" sealed in the hull of the Great Eastern. Pretty good ghost story--it's said they kept banging on the hull....

But I think you're right.
Quote:
Much has been made of the riveter and possibly his boy who were supposedly sealed up between the two hulls of the Great Eastern during construction. When the ship was broken up the breakers made no mention, in their records, of finding a skeleton, nothing was reported in the local press at the time and there are no records of an inquest being held following such a discovery. Brunel twice ordered the space between the two hulls to be cleaned out once before the ship was launched, following the pumping out of the water pumped in to stop her floating off. The second inspection and clean out was made in June 1859 during fitting out. Should anyone have become trapped between the hulls they could have escaped through the inspection hatches in the inner hull.
Wikipedia has a good account of that amazing but somewhat unlucky ship. Including the rumors, of course! Similar tales were told of other ships.

I know that SDMB is fact based. But rumors & legends are fascinating--as rumors & legends.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.