The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2007, 02:42 PM
Schnitte Schnitte is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Is there a "generally accepted" rank of the symbolic values of precious metals?

It has been common to use the names of precious metals or other valuable materials for things to which you want to attach an aura of exclusivity. There are "gold" credit cards, "diamond" records, the gold/silver/bronze medals from the Olympics (the first instance of such a scheme in use?), and "platinum" collections or artists' works.

Is there a generally ranking of the relative value of these materials? It's obvious that silver ranks above bronze and gold above silver. The next step above gold seems to be platinum, and diamond apparently outranks platinum. Occasionally, I've also seen palladium and even rhodium used in such a manner.
__________________
PLEONASM: An army of words escorting a corporal of thought.

--- Ambrose Bierce
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 07-01-2007, 03:01 PM
samclem samclem is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 20,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schnitte
... the gold/silver/bronze medals from the Olympics (the first instance of such a scheme in use?), and "platinum" collections or artists' works.
The awarding for medals for competitions in gold, silver and bronze goes back to at least before 1855 in the US. I have some. And easily found cites on a database. Platinum, OTOH, was not a very precious metal back in the 19th century.

Sorry I can't answer the rest of your question.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2007, 05:03 PM
yabob yabob is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,997
We've had a couple of threads on the curious perception of the value of titanium, which is often used to indicate a level far above the metal's actual value:

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=258224
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=303447

Modern marketers are muddying the water a good bit here, I believe. For instance, "cobalt" this and that seems to be used to confer cachet sometimes, too. Like titanium, cobalt is an industrial metal which is expensive enough that you only use it for specialized purposes, but isn't a "precious metal" (Seems to be about $30/lb, and was $17/lb in 2006.)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-01-2007, 05:14 PM
Squink Squink is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem
The awarding for medals for competitions in gold, silver and bronze goes back to at least before 1855 in the US.
Aluminum was probably too precious to be included in that ranking:
Quote:
1854 Henri Sainte-Claire Deville (France) improves Wöhler's method to create the first commercial process. The metal's price, initially higher than that of gold and platinum, drops by 90% over the following 10 years. The price is still high enough to inhibit its widespread adoption by industry.

1855 A bar of aluminium, the new precious metal, is exhibited at the Paris Exhibition.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2007, 06:15 PM
T_SQUARE T_SQUARE is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
The very top of the Washington Monument is made of aluminum, as it was the bees knees at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2007, 06:39 PM
samclem samclem is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 20,397
By 1860, aluminum was quoted at "36 shillings per pound" (about $9 US/pound). That would make it cheaper than silver by that date, at least I think. Or at least close.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2007, 07:27 PM
Squink Squink is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem
By 1860, aluminum was quoted at "36 shillings per pound" (about $9 US/pound).
I wonder if any 50's brides got suckered into aluminum wedding bands? Just 10 years on, and all their friends would been snickering at them.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-01-2007, 07:32 PM
Tranquilis Tranquilis is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
In the US military, silver out-ranks gold.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-01-2007, 07:48 PM
yabob yabob is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squink
I wonder if any 50's brides got suckered into aluminum wedding bands? Just 10 years on, and all their friends would been snickering at them.
After 1886, they would have REALLY gotten snickered at - that's when the Hall-Héroult process was invented (independently, and essentially simultaneously by Hall in the US and Héroult in France). Once that got commercialized, the price dropped by a couple orders of magnitude, making aluminum cheap enough for widespread use.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-02-2007, 05:36 AM
dynamitedave dynamitedave is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Didn't a royal house toss out the silverware dining set and replace it with an aluminium one

Last edited by dynamitedave; 07-02-2007 at 05:38 AM. Reason: tense duh
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-02-2007, 09:01 AM
Sapo Sapo is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by T_SQUARE
The very top of the Washington Monument is made of aluminum, as it was the bees knees at the time.
I seem to remember that during the latest renovation, a new top of platinum was made and installed. It was stolen the very first night, since nobody thought of the need to secure it while the scaffolding was still in place. I can't find a quote for it anywhere. I am just making up stuff or did this really happen the way I remember it?

oh, and tungsten seems to be the new platinum. For wedding bands, at least.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-02-2007, 02:01 PM
Spectre of Pithecanthropus Spectre of Pithecanthropus is online now
Dark Penguin of Retribution
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Behind the rabbit
Posts: 16,811
Come to think of it, isn't there an "Iron Ring" tradition among Canadian engineers?

Why was platinum not a precious metal in the 1800s? Did they have so much of it, or was it just that it wasn't well enough known to have intrinsic value? I do remember reading about some demonstration strikes for new U.S. coin designs, back then, being made from platinum.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-02-2007, 02:51 PM
yabob yabob is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectre of Pithecanthropus
Come to think of it, isn't there an "Iron Ring" tradition among Canadian engineers?

Why was platinum not a precious metal in the 1800s? Did they have so much of it, or was it just that it wasn't well enough known to have intrinsic value? I do remember reading about some demonstration strikes for new U.S. coin designs, back then, being made from platinum.
Although it was known to the ancient world, it wasn't really isolated and recognized as a separate metal until the 18th century (at one time it was thought to be an alloy of gold and iron). According to this, it started becoming popular for jewelry uses in the late 19th century, partially because of improved techniques for refining and working it (hardness and high melting point made it difficult to work with):

http://www.professionaljeweler.com/a...n99/0699v.html
Quote:
After 1880, platinum began to supplant silver in settings for diamonds and pearls and, around 1890, settings of pure platinum appeared. As demand grew, the price of platinum rose until it surpassed silver and gold.
This is interesting:
Quote:
The Spanish considered platinum a nuisance and derogatorily named it platina (small silver). While platinum resembled silver visually, it resisted melting or forging, so the Spanish government banned its import in the 17th century. What little platinum did make its way to Europe entered as contraband.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-02-2007, 03:19 PM
Duke of Rat Duke of Rat is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
I seem to recall, I think it was in one of James Burke's "Connections" episodes, that the Spanish used platinum in the alloys of their cannons made in South America. Anyway, the "gotcha" was that the value of the junk platinum that they though was worthless exceeded the value of the treasure they brought back (in modern values I guess). I can't find a cite, and did Burke have a habit of playing loose with some facts to make a point, so don't place any value on this probably flawed remembering.

ETA: It might have been platinum sand used to cast the cannon, not as an alloy.

Last edited by Duke of Rat; 07-02-2007 at 03:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-02-2007, 06:24 PM
jackdavinci jackdavinci is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Port Jefferson Sta, NY
Posts: 7,442
If you go by anniversaries, the list would seem to be:

Year / British / American / Modern

1st / Paper / Paper / Clocks
2nd / Cotton / Cotton / Desk / items
3rd / Leather / Leather / Leather
4th / Fruit, / Flowers / Linen, / Silk / Clothing
5th / Wood / Wood / Silverware
6th / Sugar / Iron / Wooden
7th / Wool, / Copper / Wool, / Copper / Wool, / Copper
8th / Bronze, / Pottery / Bronze / Tourmaline
9th / Pottery, / Willow / Pottery / China
10th / Tin / Tin, / Aluminum / Electronics
11th / Steel / Steel / Appliances
12th / Silk, / Linen / Silk / Garnet
13th / Lace / Lace / Lingerie
14th / Ivory / Ivory / Sculpture
15th / Crystal / Crystal / Crystal
16th / Tungsten / Tungsten / Peridot
17th / Turquoise / / Watches
18th / / Tanzanite
19th / / Aquamarine
20th / China / China / Topaz, / Diamond
25th / Silver / Silver / Sterling / silver
30th / Pearl / Pearl / Amethyst
35th / Coral / Coral, / Jade / Jade, / Agate
40th / Ruby / Ruby / Ruby
45th / Sapphire / Sapphire / Sapphire
50th / Gold / Gold / Gold
55th / Emerald / Emerald / Emerald
60th / Diamond / Diamond / Diamond
70th / Platinum / Platinum / Platinum
75th / Diamond / Diamond / Diamond
80th / Oak / Oak / Oak
90th / Granite / Granite / Granite
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.