|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The authority of the gavel.
Does the banging of the gavel have any legal authority, or is it merely ceremonial?
What I mean is, if a judge doesn't bang it, does the decision stand nevertheless? Could the person demand a retrial based on the judge's omission? Also, is "bang" the right word? Sounds kinda crude. I offer "whack" instead. Peace, mangeorge
__________________
Stop smoking. Do it! Neither Windshield nor Bug am I. Give us br'er rabbits. Last edited by mangeorge; 12-21-2007 at 08:08 PM. |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Probably the use of the gavel to 'punctuate rulings and proclamations' in a court is only a matter of custom, not a legal requirement. However, if it is being struck by the judge to call for attention or encourage compsure among the population of a courtroom, ignoring it could be construed as showing contempt for the court. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The gavel doesn't have any bearing on the legalities of the case. The few times I've been in courtrooms, the judge never used it. It could be used to signal a session is over, or to get the attention of the gallery, but is just a dignfied way for the judge to do the equivalent of shouting, "Hey, you!"
__________________
"One never knows, do one?" Provider of quality fantasy and science fiction since 1982. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
How about this: Why is it called a "gavel" and not a "mallet" or "hammer"?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The French word is "marteau," I'm told. Rather like the Latin-derived "mallet." |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Now take the French Canadians. Please. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Incidentally, you cannot persuade TV and movie people of this, but Canadian judges do not use gavels.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Tripler And the judge speaks more French than those in Berkeley. Last edited by Tripler; 12-22-2007 at 07:41 AM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|