The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > The Game Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2008, 04:47 PM
dalej42 dalej42 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,257
Would a New England/Dallas Super Bowl become the highest rated program of all time?

Here is a list of the top rated television programs of all time.

Would a Dallas vs New England Super Bowl top the list? There are some reasons to think it might. New England would be going for their perfect season. Both Dallas and New England have a national following. Both Dallas and New England have people who hate them.

However, I don't quite think it would be the Mash series finale. We live in a 200 channel world. In the 3 network world, no one would program anything worth watching against major events such as the Super Bowl. Also, the demographics have changed. The huge Hispanic population isn't following NFL football very avidly.

I'd say the broadcast would easily beat Super Bowl XLI and set a record which will be very hard to beat for any Super Bowl in the future.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 01-12-2008, 04:55 PM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 21,107
Your own list shows that the Super Bowls have consistently garnered 40-42% of the audience in the 2000s. 44.4% is needed even to make it into the top 29.

My WAG is that there is less than a 50% chance that a New England/Dallas Super Bowl would make it into the top tier and an absolutely flat 0.00% chance it would be in the top 10, let alone number one.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:06 PM
Wee Bairn Wee Bairn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Biafra
Posts: 5,734
I don't think so - too many TV channels nowadays. I don't think any program of any type in the cable era could do it.

Last edited by Wee Bairn; 01-12-2008 at 05:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:06 PM
gonzomax gonzomax is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 26,307
I buy it. The perfect season and the stinky Cowboys. I watch,
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:15 PM
Omniscient Omniscient is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 15,781
Not sure about the answer to the OP, but I can guarantee beyond any shadow of a doubt that a Green Bay - New England Super Bowl would draw a much larger audience than the Cowboys - Pats would. Non-football fans love Favre and the Packers, little old ladies in Tampa would be circling it on their calendars. Lots of people loathe Dallas and New England so much that they'll probably be so turned off by that matchup they'll go see a movie.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-13-2008, 01:49 AM
some white dude some white dude is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
No way. With cable and satellite there are simply too many other options. Look at the Super Bowls near the top. The '96 SB is the only one in the 90s to crack the top 20.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-13-2008, 07:52 AM
DSYoungEsq DSYoungEsq is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalej42
Here is a list of the top rated television programs of all time.

Would a Dallas vs New England Super Bowl top the list? There are some reasons to think it might. New England would be going for their perfect season. Both Dallas and New England have a national following. Both Dallas and New England have people who hate them.

However, I don't quite think it would be the Mash series finale. We live in a 200 channel world. In the 3 network world, no one would program anything worth watching against major events such as the Super Bowl. Also, the demographics have changed. The huge Hispanic population isn't following NFL football very avidly.

I'd say the broadcast would easily beat Super Bowl XLI and set a record which will be very hard to beat for any Super Bowl in the future.
If you mean, will the Super Bowl of 2008 end up at the top of the list of %age of households, then there is no way. If you look at that list, no show since 1998 is on it. There simply are too many households now which either don't watch TV, or which watch something other than what the rest of the herd is watching.

Now, if you mean ranked by share of those households watching, then that's conceivable, if still a stretch. The last several Super Bowls have managed a share of between 60% and 65%. But Super Bowls have garnered shares of over 70% before, though, again, that was before you could watch 200+ channels.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-13-2008, 08:11 AM
Mr Shine Mr Shine is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
I'm very surprised to see Man walking on the moon not in the top 29 most watched USTV events.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-13-2008, 08:26 AM
Mr Shine Mr Shine is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Shine
I'm very surprised to see Man walking on the moon not in the top 29 most watched USTV events.
Never mind, just noticed it's sorted by share rather than number of people watching. I assume most (all?) of the major networks were showing the same thing, so going by share none would have an advantage.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-13-2008, 10:50 AM
blondebear blondebear is online now
Shouting Grasshopper
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Meridian/280
Posts: 8,947
One thing about the Superbowl this time around: they have a great band playing at halftime. I doubt you'll see any wardrobe or silhouette-related incidents with Petty and The Heartbreakers.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-13-2008, 11:02 AM
JohnT JohnT is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 11,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Shine
I'm very surprised to see Man walking on the moon not in the top 29 most watched USTV events.
I don't think records like that are released (I do think they're kept, though. Why not?) It's not a bad bet to guess that the most-watched TV event since 1998 was 9/11/2001 coverage but you don't see that on the list either. I didn't see Diana's funeral covered in the ratings either, though it was a major TV event.

Last edited by JohnT; 01-13-2008 at 11:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-13-2008, 06:57 PM
Telemark Telemark is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Hub of the sports world
Posts: 12,400
Well, that ain't gonna happen.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-13-2008, 07:13 PM
Fiveyearlurker Fiveyearlurker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by blondebear
One thing about the Superbowl this time around: they have a great band playing at halftime. I doubt you'll see any wardrobe or silhouette-related incidents with Petty and The Heartbreakers.
I'd pay to see that.

(sorry, I have an unnatural and uncharacteristically homosexual attraction toward Mr. Petty)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-13-2008, 07:21 PM
Gorsnak Gorsnak is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Saskaboom
Posts: 7,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnT
It's not a bad bet to guess that the most-watched TV event since 1998 was 9/11/2001 coverage but you don't see that on the list either.
Well sure, but it was watched on ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc. The all-news channels will have pulled higher than normal ratings that day, but no one broadcast will have been anything remarkable in terms of number of viewers.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-13-2008, 08:31 PM
zamboniracer zamboniracer is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Above the Uecker seats.
Posts: 4,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by blondebear
One thing about the Superbowl this time around: they have a great band playing at halftime. I doubt you'll see any wardrobe or silhouette-related incidents with Petty and The Heartbreakers.
That's how I pick what concert the to go to: the one that's attached to a football game.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-13-2008, 08:38 PM
blondebear blondebear is online now
Shouting Grasshopper
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Meridian/280
Posts: 8,947
Point taken. But the talent lineup over the years is pretty impressive.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-13-2008, 08:47 PM
PunditLisa PunditLisa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: 'burbs of Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 12,379
I guess we'll never know. How big a draw is Ely Manning?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-13-2008, 08:55 PM
jackelope jackelope is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
I'd think Patriots-Packers would be the best possible TV draw (given how the playoffs have gone so far). You'd have the Patriots going for the perfect season, plus the possibility of seeing Brett Favre's final game.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-13-2008, 08:59 PM
gonzomax gonzomax is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 26,307
The geezer fans will be watching next week. Can Green Bat do it again. They looked real good yesterday. The weather could be ugly. A throw back game with a throw back quarterback. The stars are aligned.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-13-2008, 09:29 PM
zamboniracer zamboniracer is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Above the Uecker seats.
Posts: 4,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackelope
I'd think Patriots-Packers would be the best possible TV draw (given how the playoffs have gone so far). You'd have the Patriots going for the perfect season, plus the possibility of seeing Brett Favre's final game.

That settles it. Here's hoping the Chargers beat NE next week, just to hear the network suits whine about how their ratings will suffer. From an NFC standpoint, both the Giants and Packers are good attractions.

Last edited by zamboniracer; 01-13-2008 at 09:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-14-2008, 03:33 PM
DSYoungEsq DSYoungEsq is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by PunditLisa
I guess we'll never know. How big a draw is Ely Manning?
Who knows? But Peyton's brother, Eli, might draw a look or two.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-14-2008, 03:38 PM
FlightlessBird FlightlessBird is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzomax
The weather could be ugly.
In Arizona?

Or did you mean in the Championship game? Actually I think the weather may be worse in NE next weekend than in GB.

Last edited by FlightlessBird; 01-14-2008 at 03:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-14-2008, 04:57 PM
cmkeller cmkeller is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
The Super Bowl might benefit from the writers' strike - in the past, some networks have tried to compete for women's eyes during the Super Bowl, but this year, what would they offer?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-14-2008, 05:41 PM
EddyTeddyFreddy EddyTeddyFreddy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Exurbia, No'thuh Bawst'n
Posts: 12,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlightlessBird
In Arizona?

Or did you mean in the Championship game? Actually I think the weather may be worse in NE next weekend than in GB.
Likely to be in the single digits with a wind.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-14-2008, 11:48 PM
zamboniracer zamboniracer is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Above the Uecker seats.
Posts: 4,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmkeller
The Super Bowl might benefit from the writers' strike - in the past, some networks have tried to compete for women's eyes during the Super Bowl, but this year, what would they offer?
All Oprah, all the time.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-04-2008, 11:26 AM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 21,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase
Your own list shows that the Super Bowls have consistently garnered 40-42% of the audience in the 2000s. 44.4% is needed even to make it into the top 29.

My WAG is that there is less than a 50% chance that a New England/Dallas Super Bowl would make it into the top tier and an absolutely flat 0.00% chance it would be in the top 10, let alone number one.
Not too bad a prediction. Preliminary overnight ratings say that the Super Bowl just squeaked into the top 29 at a 44.7 rating and 67 share. That's puts it very close to Super Bowl XXXII, from ten years ago.

Actual number of viewers is expected to be huge, because the number of people and sets in the U.S. keep rising every year.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.