The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2008, 01:40 AM
Maastricht Maastricht is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Dutch in the Netherlands
Posts: 8,061
Factual truth of scary urban legends of cats smothering babies?

The theory, striking fear into many parent's hearts who have both cats and a newborn baby, is that cats, always looking for warm places to curl up, will jump into the crib/cradle, and sit on a babies face, thereby smothering him and silencing his cries, so the baby suffocates.

I have three cats, and now that my newborn, MaastrichtSon has been home from the hospital for three weeks, I find that scary scenario more and more unlikely. Cats are not stupid. They obviously know he's alive, and they tend to give him a wide berth. Also, i doubt that MaastrichtSons cries if a act sat on him would go unnoticed.

I tend to believe such stories have entered the realm of urban legends because of parents afraid it might happen; but can anyone point me to real incidents where cats hurt babies? Considering how many people both have cats and babies, if it happens, it must happen quite often.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 06-06-2008, 02:30 AM
OtakuLoki OtakuLoki is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
The problem would be proving such, I think. If the cat gets up, after the baby has expired, I'm not sure how forensics would be able to prove that it was the weight of the cat on the baby that kept the baby from being able to breathe. It's not actually enough weight to damage the baby, nor cause any trauma that I can imagine.

Which is why it could be for some people a seductive explanation for SIDS, where nominally healthy babies seem to be found dead without any obvious causes. Alas, for the reasons you mentioned, I find it easier to believe that a baby might die for reasons that can't currently be diagnosed than that cats really are smothering all that many babies.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2008, 04:22 AM
Pushkin Pushkin is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Joking to one side, wouldn't they find a tonne of cat hair on the baby, possibly in its mouth and nose?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2008, 04:27 AM
OtakuLoki OtakuLoki is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pushkin
Joking to one side, wouldn't they find a tonne of cat hair on the baby, possibly in its mouth and nose?

The way I'd been imaging it, the cat woud be sitting on the baby's chest - preventing the weak muscles there from expanding enough for proper exchange of air in the baby's lungs.

While there'd be some hair from that on the baby's mouth and nose, but unless the cat is shedding huge amounts, I just don't think that there'd be enough hair there from normal shedding levels to be seen as indicative, compared to the pet hairs that would be in the apartment from the simple presence of the pet in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2008, 07:32 AM
C K Dexter Haven C K Dexter Haven is offline
Right Hand of the Master
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Chicago north suburb
Posts: 16,066
Slightly tangential, but relevant: What's the origin of the myth that cats can suck the breath out of babies?

Last edited by C K Dexter Haven; 06-06-2008 at 07:32 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2008, 09:44 AM
muldoonthief muldoonthief is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 7,271
I've never heard of this actually happening, but if you're really worried, you can get a crib tent like this one. We had one for our first 2 kids, but the actual intent was to keep the curious cats out of the crib to prevent them from shedding all over it. IIRC, once the babes were old enough to pull themselves up, we only used it when the crib was empty.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-06-2008, 10:13 AM
Pushkin Pushkin is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by muldoonthief
I've never heard of this actually happening
Neither have I, but I went nuts when one of my daughter's mother's cats used the cot as a short cut to hop from window ledge to doorway. I thought immediately it was going to bed down beside or on her and out by the scruff of the neck it went.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-06-2008, 10:16 AM
Beware of Doug Beware of Doug is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maastricht
Also, i doubt that MaastrichtSons cries if a act sat on him would go unnoticed.
The Aristocrats!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-06-2008, 11:24 AM
Cheesesteak Cheesesteak is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by OtakuLoki
Which is why it could be for some people a seductive explanation for SIDS, where nominally healthy babies seem to be found dead without any obvious causes.
There's a thought that SIDS is often caused by suffocation, prompting suggestions like no loose bedding, no face down sleeping, no puffy crib bumpers as ways to reduce the incidence of SIDS. I would consider a co-sleeping cat the equivalent of a loose blanket, it's suggested I keep that stuff out of the crib, so the cats stay out of the crib.

Once we're past the SIDS risk stage, the kid can sleep with the cats all he wants.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-06-2008, 02:17 PM
Kizarvexius Kizarvexius is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
A friend of mine who is an unapologetic cat lover insisted that she had personally witnessed a family cat climbing into her own infant son's crib and settling down across the sleeping infant's face. Would it have killed the baby? She didn't wait to find out. Mean kitty was banished from the nursery until Tony was almost a year old.

Perhaps the whole "cat smothering babies" bit is an old wives tales and a lot of superstitious rot. But as there continues to be debate on the subject, best to err on the side of caution.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-06-2008, 03:45 PM
Dr. Drake Dr. Drake is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
This is neither a myth nor a legend nor an urban legend. Those terms all require narrative content, e.g. a story about a cat smothering a child. The bare substance is a belief (or superstition, if you prefer).

It has a long history, but it has much more to do with cultural ambivalence about cats and their role in the household than it does with actual cat behavior, not to mention our need to explain the inexplicable (SIDS etc.). Cats do have a tendency to seek warm places (baby's bed) and perhaps lick things to taste them (mother's milk, meat-flavored baby food), but it's a long leap from that to smothering children or sucking their breath out, unintentionally or deliberately.

A suffocating baby is likely to struggle, making an uncomfortable pillow for a cat. Furthermore, even a weak baby can probably irritate a cat enough to dislodge it. Of course, there's a lot to be said for not leaving infants, babies, or toddlers around ANY animal unsupervised. Animals are known for having poor judgement as to what hurts a human, even a beloved one, and they can't be relied upon to have a child's best interests at heart at all times.

Both the smothering and the sucking-out-of-baby's-breath are folk beliefs of long standing, probably originating in the connection of two unrelated events (cats in baby's beds and babies who die in bed). There's enough truth in the constituent parts to keep the superstition alive by confirmation bias, and there's no good reason to test it. The stakes are too high (who wants to risk a baby's life?) and there's frankly no benefit to having an animal in the crib now that we have things like central heating and goretex. So the belief, largely unchallenged, lives on, fueled by the psychological need to displace worry about factors beyond our control (what if baby dies?) onto controllables (I'll remove the cat. That'll save ’er).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-06-2008, 10:31 PM
commasense commasense is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,171
Here's Snopes' take on the question. It is, frankly, more extensive and thorough than Cecil's column.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.