The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Cafe Society

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2008, 12:35 PM
Illuminatiprimus Illuminatiprimus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Hayden Christiansen - shit actor?

Okay, so we all know and loathe Christiansen for his so-wooden-he's-hand-carved performance in the Star Wars prequels. But a lot of people claim that this isn't due to a lack of acting ability on Christiansen's part, but more

a) a lack of directing ability on the part of Lucas (after all there are plenty of other good actors in those films giving completely sub-par performances) and

b) the fact that it's pretty impossible to act well when 90% of your co-stars and activity is occurring on a green screen.

People also cite Shattered Glass as a film in which Christiansen is actually (shock horror) quite good.

Now, I saw Shattered Glass earlier today and agree that Christiansen is several orders of magnitude better in that than in any of the SW films. But one swallow does not a summer make, and given that people don't exactly rave about his performances in films like Awake and Jumper I'm wondering if maybe that was an abberration and his default setting is, in fact, shit.

What say you Straight Dope?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 08-25-2008, 12:43 PM
Captain Amazing Captain Amazing is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 22,036
He was good in Life as a House. Eh, I don't think he's a great actor, but he's certainly not a bad one.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2008, 12:46 PM
WhyNot WhyNot is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
I thought he was fantastic in Life As A House, as well. I haven't seen anything else. I think he may just be a very young actor, and still subject to the whims and talents of his director.

Let's face it, Liam Neeson was wooden in SW, and even my beloved Ewan MacGregor was a bit...off. If those two strong experienced actors couldn't salvage the work from Lucas's hamfisted dialogue and cardboard characterizations, what hope did Christensen have? I don't think it's that Lucas couldn't direct, it's that he OVER directed - he had this little boy's comic book vision of what his movie should look like, and he didn't let perfectly competent actors do their job.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2008, 12:48 PM
MovieMogul MovieMogul is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
He is too weaselly and immature in his bearing to be a leading man. He was perfect in Shattered Glass playing someone insecure, unctious, superficially nice but untrustworthy and whiny. There's not a lot of parts (beyond character-driven and second banana roles) that require that sort of emotional tenor. He may be fine within a limited range, but when playing someone romantic or charismatic or smart or interesting, he's simply absurd and unbelievable.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2008, 12:50 PM
Zebra Zebra is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: LIC
Posts: 19,296
He seems to be as good as his material.

Actually good material makes him better, bad material makes him worse.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2008, 01:09 PM
CaerieD CaerieD is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
While I think he did a decent job in Life as a House and was perfect for Shattered Glass, he's...not a great actor and I'm not sure if he'll ever become one. There's something very mannered about the way he talks and carries himself, so that he never disappears into a role. With some actors, they can get away with not disappearing into a role, but they need to have a ton of charisma to get away with that.

Christensen is hot, but he's not very charismatic. Even in interviews, he doesn't seem to come off as terribly charming. There may be the potential to grow as an actor, but with his current choice in films I'm not seeing much opportunity for it. Some more theatre work and juicy character roles might help, but they don't appear to be on the horizon right now.

Then again, if he just spent all of his time on screen naked and not talking, it'd all be good.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-25-2008, 04:07 PM
Illuminatiprimus Illuminatiprimus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArchiveGuy
He is too weaselly and immature in his bearing to be a leading man. He was perfect in Shattered Glass playing someone insecure, unctious, superficially nice but untrustworthy and whiny. There's not a lot of parts (beyond character-driven and second banana roles) that require that sort of emotional tenor. He may be fine within a limited range, but when playing someone romantic or charismatic or smart or interesting, he's simply absurd and unbelievable.
Bingo.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-25-2008, 04:47 PM
Skald the Rhymer Skald the Rhymer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,512
Like several others, I came in to mention the wonderful Life as a House, in which AC was quite good. His poor performance in the SW trilogy was because he was simply overwhelmed by the horrible script and direction and lacked the experience to compensate for it. Consider that Natlie Portman (also quite talented but about the same age) also did a poor job, while McGregor, Jackson, and (especially) Lee were all quite serviceable because they'd been around longer.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-25-2008, 05:05 PM
The Scrivener The Scrivener is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
There's something about Hayden's voice and enunciation that falls short for me. Maybe he's struggling to project in a lower register than what comes naturally; maybe it's a quirk of his sinus cavities; maybe it's a slight speech impediment; maybe he has an I.Q. of 87. But until he develops a gift for gab, I think he should stick to action films. I thought he was fine in Jumper and particularly well-matched to the age and other aspects of his character. As eye candy, on the proverbial decimal scale the lad's an eleven.

Has anybody seen H.C. in the latest remake of the Decameron stories yet? It's gotten some terrible reviews, but I'm partial to the Boccaccio classic and will rent this sooner or later, regardless of how bad it's said to be.

One reviewer on IMDB called it "soft porn" (with H.C. playing the character who gets the most action, including seducing various nuns, this is very promising indeed). Hmm, come to think about it, this may be a title worth buying...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-25-2008, 11:07 PM
CaerieD CaerieD is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
The Scrivener, he's mentioned in interviews before that he has a larger-than-average tongue. He had to wear a special mouth guard when he played sports in school to keep from biting it off. While it does make his voice a bit slurry, I won't hold his unusually large tongue against him. (Now, against me, on the other hand...)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-25-2008, 11:09 PM
GuanoLad GuanoLad is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 18,126
He and James Franco should play brothers.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-25-2008, 11:58 PM
Annie Annie is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaerieD
The Scrivener, he's mentioned in interviews before that he has a larger-than-average tongue. He had to wear a special mouth guard when he played sports in school to keep from biting it off.
You have got to be kidding me. Well, it explains Jamie Oliver.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-26-2008, 12:11 PM
Otto Otto is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Madison WI
Posts: 22,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuanoLad
He and James Franco should play brothers.
No, they should play boyfriends.

HC is much like Keanu Reeves. It's not that he can't act. It's that most of the time he chooses not to.

And really, can you blame him? He performs the way he does and people still want to pay him millions of dollars. If people were willing to pay me millions of dollars to not act, I'd laugh woodenly all the way to the bank.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-26-2008, 12:18 PM
Otto Otto is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Madison WI
Posts: 22,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaerieD
The Scrivener, he's mentioned in interviews before that he has a larger-than-average tongue.
I'll be in mah bunk.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-26-2008, 02:39 PM
Lionne Lionne is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaerieD
The Scrivener, he's mentioned in interviews before that he has a larger-than-average tongue.
Umm..pictures anyone??
Never mind, found one. Large tongue indeed!

http://justjared.buzznet.com/gallery...en-farm-01.jpg

Last edited by Lionne; 08-26-2008 at 02:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.