The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2009, 09:14 AM
joebuck20 joebuck20 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
How hard would it be to build a Saturn V rocket today?

Say, NASA decided to go with a tried and true method when they went back to the moon and use a Saturn V. Would it be possible to build one today? What sort of material and design changes would it have to incorporate? How cost effective would it be today compared to when they were originally built?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 07-20-2009, 10:09 AM
Bijou Drains Bijou Drains is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Do you mean build the same exact Saturn V? Probably could not be done because the parts are no longer made - unless you want to spend a fortune on custom parts. I think you mean build the same type rocket with newer materials and technologies - that can be done. But I don't think that makes sense. It would be like building a WW II bomber with carbon fiber body when modern planes are so much better.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-20-2009, 10:48 AM
joebuck20 joebuck20 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bijou Drains View Post
Do you mean build the same exact Saturn V? Probably could not be done because the parts are no longer made - unless you want to spend a fortune on custom parts. I think you mean build the same type rocket with newer materials and technologies - that can be done. But I don't think that makes sense. It would be like building a WW II bomber with carbon fiber body when modern planes are so much better.
That's what I meant - building the same type of rocket, but with newer materials. The Saturn V seemed to serve it's purpose well. One could make the argument that it's not reusable, but when you think neither are most of the space shuttle's components.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-20-2009, 10:53 AM
HorseloverFat HorseloverFat is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
It would be pretty foolish to make the same rocket as the design is very old. Once you start talking about "updating" it then youre pretty much building a new rocket. You need to redo all the testing, engineering, etc. Might as well start from scratch at that point.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-20-2009, 10:56 AM
Johnny L.A. Johnny L.A. is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: NoWA
Posts: 45,074
Check out the quote in the first post (mine) in this thread, and Stranger on a Train's post.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-20-2009, 11:08 AM
Simplicio Simplicio is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Well, making a modern copy is not going to happen for reasons Johnny linked to.

One could argue that the Ares V is sort of like what your suggesting: it's a heavy lift rocket built for an Apollo-like moon mission (and apparently it's final stage uses a varient of the engine used on the Saturn V).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-20-2009, 12:18 PM
Keeve Keeve is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebuck20 View Post
That's what I meant - building the same type of rocket, but with newer materials.
Then it's not the "tried and true method" that you mentioned in the OP. You'll need all sorts of testing to make sure it works.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-20-2009, 01:42 PM
fiddlesticks fiddlesticks is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alamo City
Posts: 3,915
Ares V appears to be exactly what the OP suggests. "Upon completion the Ares V will be the most powerful rocket ever built, lifting more into orbit than even the Saturn V." At least we aren't under-designing this thing. And we aren't exactly building it from scratch either, a lot of Space Shuttle era hardware is going into it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-20-2009, 02:02 PM
Fear Itself Fear Itself is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: 847 mi. from Cecil
Posts: 25,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebuck20 View Post
One could make the argument that it's not reusable, but when you think neither are most of the space shuttle's components.
Isn't the external fuel tank the only major part that is not reused?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-20-2009, 02:52 PM
Der Trihs Der Trihs is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: California
Posts: 33,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fear Itself View Post
Isn't the external fuel tank the only major part that is not reused?
I don't think the solid fuel boosters are reused.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-20-2009, 02:53 PM
Johnny L.A. Johnny L.A. is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: NoWA
Posts: 45,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Der Trihs View Post
I don't think the solid fuel boosters are reused.
Yes, the SRBs are recovered and reused.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-20-2009, 03:00 PM
gazpacho gazpacho is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by Der Trihs View Post
I don't think the solid fuel boosters are reused.
The solid fuel boosters are reused.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sh...ery_ships.html
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.