Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2017, 08:35 PM
boffking boffking is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: New England
Posts: 2,400
Single payer healthcare in Vermont and Maine

https://legislature.maine.gov/legis/...s/SP012701.asp
There is a draft bill in the Maine legislature making the mention of single payer healthcare in Maine. A snippet:"Portions of the system will be based on the single-payor system in place in Vermont...". What is the system in Vermont?
I am in favor of single-payer, and would like to see this proposal fleshed out more.
  #2  
Old 03-16-2017, 08:42 PM
PastTense PastTense is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6,061
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermon...th_care_reform

It died:
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/1...vermont-113711
  #3  
Old 03-16-2017, 08:44 PM
Wesley Clark Wesley Clark is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 18,220
http://pnhp.org/blog/2011/01/19/will...l-for-vermont/

Quote:
The authors’ Option 2 is essentially PPACA with a “public option” added – a public insurance plan that competes with the private plans. Their analysis shows that it would have only a very modest impact on reducing costs, and an almost negligible impact on reducing the numbers of uninsured. Thus the bluster in support of the public option was misdirected. That energy should have been redirected to supporting single payer instead.

Options 1B and 3 are almost identical. They are both single payer models that totally replace the private insurance plans. They have an “Essential Benefits Package” with an actuarial value of about 87 percent which is close to the typical employer-sponsored plans before they began introducing high deductibles. Their analyses shows that these plans would cover everyone without any increase in spending since the single payer efficiencies would be enough to pay for those currently uninsured or under-insured. So this is the really good news – single payer works (though read on).

The primary difference in 1B and 3 is that 1B is publicly administered whereas 3 is administered by an independent board that contracts with a competitively-selected third party to manage provider relations and claims adjudication and processing. The authors state a preference for Option 3 claiming that it saves a little bit more money by requiring potential managers to compete for the contract. That is highly dubious and more likely was inserted to appease the market ideology of a sector of the twenty some odd contributors to this study. Considering this, I think that we can extrapolate the fact that the authors would also endorse Option 1B, since it is otherwise identical.
I think they were looking at option 3.
  #4  
Old 03-16-2017, 08:48 PM
boffking boffking is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: New England
Posts: 2,400
That's really strange they would write the draft that way then.
The 128th Maine Legislature began in December 2016. The bill also references the Colorado referendum of 2016, so I can tell it's not just an old proposal brought back.
  #5  
Old 03-17-2017, 10:00 PM
tomndebb tomndebb is offline
Mod Rocker
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: N E Ohio
Posts: 40,418
Not an Elections topic.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2017 Sun-Times Media, LLC.

 
Copyright © 2017