Lately I’ve been busy reviewing ‘promotion packages’ for people applying for promotion here at the University (from assistant prof to associate, and from associate to full). Having been doing this for some years now, I can say that the whole process seems pretty fair and transparent. All the various procedural aspects of applying for promotion are made very clear. But what impresses me more is that the criteria for promotion are also quite clear. In fact, they’re not only specified for each of the two levels of promotion (from assistant to associate, and from associate to full professor), but also for the ‘basis’ (career path) on which you’re applying to be promoted, i.e. there are three: 1. research, or 2. excellence in teaching, or 3. “creative professional activity” (which I won’t bother defining here).
In any case, all this got me thinking about promotion in the military. I really don’t have a clue how it works.
Do you apply for promotion, or does someone just do it on your behalf when they think you’re ready?
Is there a board convened to assess your promotion or is it simply up to your superior(s)? And if the latter, how far up does it go? Would, say, a captain’s promotion be determined by a major, lieutenant, or even a colonel?
What criteria are used? Are they confidential, or can they be looked up by someone preparing for promotion?
What data is examined (e.g. are letters of support sought? From whom? Who chooses them? e.g. is the opinion of your subordinates taken into account?)
Is the process different for enlisted personnel versus officers? And, within officers, is the process the same at all levels (e.g. is the process different going from lieutenant to captain and going from colonel to general?)
So, lots of questions and obviously I don’t expect anyone to answer all of them, or even several. Still, they’re all basically just variations on a theme, so any input would be helpful - and much appreciated.
Thanks!