The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:31 PM
ralph124c ralph124c is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Army Engineer Troops Used in Combat?

As I understand it, Army Engineering troops are vital-they build roads, bridges, water systems, and make it possible for an army in the field to survive. Given their importance, they are not used in combat..but in case of urgent need, they are trained (basic combat training).
Have engineering battalions ever been pressed into service as combat troops? How did they perform?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 05-29-2010, 02:59 PM
Snnipe 70E Snnipe 70E is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
My brother was in the Army Core of engineers during Vietman. He started in an open area. They built the base. At first there were no other troups in the area so if attacked they had to fight. After the base was partly built he did have to go out on some night patrols.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:07 PM
Nametag Nametag is offline
Atheopoiesist
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 7,524
Combat engineers are a separate MOS from other military engineers. They specialize in field operations to advance the mission(s) of fighting units, including bridging, fortification, demolition, etc. In the U.S. Army, they are also trained as rifle infantry, and sometimes act in that capacity. Combat engineers often advance under fire to destroy enemy fortifications and other obstacles, and they perform very well. D-Day might have failed without sappers clearing the way; it was bloody enough as it was.

Military historians of the non-Wikipedia variety are welcome to contradict any of the above, but I think I've got it right.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:16 PM
AK84 AK84 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Old British Indian Army saying, 'sappers first in harms way".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:26 PM
KarlGauss KarlGauss is offline
An old man in a dry month
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Between pole and tropic
Posts: 5,971
Have engineering battalions ever been pressed into service as combat troops? How did they perform?

They did splendidly, old boy! By Jove, even Stanley Baker won a VC!


Last edited by KarlGauss; 05-29-2010 at 03:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-29-2010, 03:53 PM
Ranchoth Ranchoth is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlGauss View Post
Hey, he told us he came here to build a bridge.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:03 PM
MichaelEmouse MichaelEmouse is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nametag View Post
Combat engineers are a separate MOS from other military engineers. They specialize in field operations to advance the mission(s) of fighting units, including bridging, fortification, demolition, etc. In the U.S. Army, they are also trained as rifle infantry, and sometimes act in that capacity. Combat engineers often advance under fire to destroy enemy fortifications and other obstacles, and they perform very well. D-Day might have failed without sappers clearing the way; it was bloody enough as it was.

Military historians of the non-Wikipedia variety are welcome to contradict any of the above, but I think I've got it right.

Same thing for combat engineers in Canada. I was in such a unit and we were trained to conduct patrols and road blocks, use machineguns, grenades, recoiless rifles and other combat-related tasks just like the infantry, artillery and armor.

Pure engineers though, I expect resemble the medical and logistics corps. They know how to operate the basic assault rifle and (hopefully) not get lost in the woods.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:39 PM
madmonk28 madmonk28 is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
My great uncle was a combat engineer with the 29th Infrantry when the landed at D day. He got shot on D day and during the battle of the Bulge, so he must have pissed someone off.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:40 PM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 24,897
Same thing for U.S. Navy Seabees and Civil Engineering Corps. Our job was to construct forward bases for the Marines and to defend what we built. We were trained in defensive combat as well as how to conduct patrols, and in ambush tactics. Every Seabee battalion carries a full complement of light and heavy weapons, and is organized into a typical fighting unit with rifle and weapons platoons. Every "home port" period was spent in both military and technical training, as well as project planning for upcoming deployments.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-29-2010, 05:31 PM
Oakminster Oakminster is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
The Seabees got a John Wayne movie, so they had to be pretty tough.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-29-2010, 05:41 PM
Tripler Tripler is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: JSOTF SDMB, OL-SLC
Posts: 6,729
Same thing for US Air Force RED HORSE Squadrons. The Air Force doesn't have offensive infantry (in the classic sense) and is usually bound to an airfield. But, RED HORSE does go outside the wire to build roads, campsites, radar sites, wells, etc. to project mission capabilities and is trained in self/site defense. Any forward demolition or explosives work is done by EOD, although the HORSE does do some explosive operations for quarry work.

Tripler
- Prior 819 RED HORSE.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-29-2010, 05:57 PM
carnivorousplant carnivorousplant is online now
Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 35,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oakminster View Post
The Seabees got a John Wayne movie, so they had to be pretty tough.
Yes, but that film doesn't end well for the Duke.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-29-2010, 06:00 PM
Dallas Jones Dallas Jones is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snnipe 70E View Post
My brother was in the Army Core of engineers during Vietman.
Oh, jeez, I just have to fix this. It's Army Corps of Engineers.

Carry on.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-29-2010, 06:21 PM
Loach Loach is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
I'm a Combat Engineer. Engineers are always in the thick of it. We are considered Combat Arms just like Infantry.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-29-2010, 06:50 PM
Snnipe 70E Snnipe 70E is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghardester View Post
Oh, jeez, I just have to fix this. It's Army Corps of Engineers.

Carry on.
OK now it is my turn to say DA
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-29-2010, 11:19 PM
Fubaya Fubaya is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
My Grandfather was a Seabee in WWII building airstrips in the Pacific island hoppping campaigns and saw a lot of action. Although he died the year I was born, I've seen the photos, letters and heard a few third-hand stories and it sounded pretty rough. Their motto is "We Build, We Fight."
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-30-2010, 08:35 AM
Alessan Alessan is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
There is also the difference between Combat Engineers and infantry/engineering units several militaries possess, like Assault Pioneers or Sappers (depending oin the army). These are elite infantry units who undergo engineering training; basically, Combat Engineers will build you a bridge, Assault Pioneers will blow up an enemy bridge.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-30-2010, 08:44 AM
Loach Loach is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
MOS 21b.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-30-2010, 09:44 AM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 24,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fubaya View Post
My Grandfather was a Seabee in WWII building airstrips in the Pacific island hoppping campaigns and saw a lot of action. Although he died the year I was born, I've seen the photos, letters and heard a few third-hand stories and it sounded pretty rough. Their motto is "We Build, We Fight."
Construimus, Batuimus officially. Hats off to your gramps: those guys were truly in the thick of things on those stinking islands.

Last edited by Chefguy; 05-30-2010 at 09:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-30-2010, 10:27 AM
FoieGrasIsEvil FoieGrasIsEvil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Nasty Nati
Posts: 13,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loach View Post
I'm a Combat Engineer. Engineers are always in the thick of it. We are considered Combat Arms just like Infantry.
"First In, Last Out"
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-30-2010, 07:01 PM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 24,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoieGrasIsEvil View Post
"First In, Last Out"
And the Seabees greet them going both ways.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-30-2010, 08:50 PM
Paul in Qatar Paul in Qatar is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
I am (or was) an Infantryman. Engineers are just about as neat as the Infantry.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-30-2010, 09:56 PM
Rick Rick is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 14,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefguy View Post
And the Seabees greet them going both ways.
There was a story in the book Can Do! that the Marines made an amphibious assault on an island in the Pacific.
Unknown to them, the day before, a group of Seabees put ashore to see if an airfield could be built there.
Anyway as the story goes, as the ramps drop on the landing craft, the first thing the Marines see is a Seabee leaning against a palm tree. The Seabee says "The Seabees are always happy to greet the Marines."
What made this doubly funny was that the average age in the Seabees was quite a few years older than the Marines, since Seabees were recruited from various trades. They were the old men in combat during WWII. My father was a JG in the Seabees in his 30s.
I make no claim as to the truth of this story, just repeating what I read.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-31-2010, 10:05 AM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 24,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick View Post
There was a story in the book Can Do! that the Marines made an amphibious assault on an island in the Pacific.
Unknown to them, the day before, a group of Seabees put ashore to see if an airfield could be built there.
Anyway as the story goes, as the ramps drop on the landing craft, the first thing the Marines see is a Seabee leaning against a palm tree. The Seabee says "The Seabees are always happy to greet the Marines."
What made this doubly funny was that the average age in the Seabees was quite a few years older than the Marines, since Seabees were recruited from various trades. They were the old men in combat during WWII. My father was a JG in the Seabees in his 30s.
I make no claim as to the truth of this story, just repeating what I read.
Another story has them making a functioning machine gun in the Aleutian Campaign using, in part, pieces from a washing machine.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-31-2010, 01:52 PM
Cheshire Human Cheshire Human is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK84 View Post
Old British Indian Army saying, 'sappers first in harms way".
Unofficial US Army combat engineer's motto: First we dig 'em, then we die in 'em

(that's the holes in the ground, trenches and other such fortifications)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-01-2010, 10:30 AM
msmith537 msmith537 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Don't combat engineers also drive these things?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-01-2010, 11:07 AM
Spiny Norman Spiny Norman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Shayna presented me with a somewhat obscure book - First across the Rhine describing the history of the 291st Engineer Combat Battalion in WWII. Quite a distinguished unit, and - as the title obviously gives away - the first engineers to construct a bridge across the Rhine. (The one famously taken more-or-less intact didn't last long.)

However, during the Battle of the Bulge, parts of this unit found itself facing the lead elements of no less a foe than the Kampfgruppe Peiper - and while they couldn't take on an enemy like that in pitched battle, their roadblocks, minefields and demolition work frustrated the advance for long enough that reinforcements were brought up.

(In the same battle, 291st patrols were also the first to make contact with survivors of the infamous Malmedy massacre.)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.