The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-09-2010, 10:34 AM
ToborAton ToborAton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Is there a word like decimate for an order of magnitude reduction?

I suppose I should start out by saying that decimate has a very precise definition: to reduce by 10%. I'm not sure I have ever actually used the word except to talk about the word. I also just realized how wildly I would use a word that means to reduce to 10%. (1) Is there such a word? (2) If not, could we make one up? (3/4) What about a word that means to reduce by/to 1/2? Is (3) Bimate?

Edit: fixed the placement of (1) before the first reply.

Last edited by ToborAton; 07-09-2010 at 10:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 07-09-2010, 10:40 AM
Rigamarole Rigamarole is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToborAton View Post
I suppose I should start out by saying that decimate has a very precise definition: to reduce by 10%.
Had a very precise definition. That definition has changed/evolved. Go ahead and look it up; even the dictionary acknowledges as much.

Last edited by Rigamarole; 07-09-2010 at 10:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-09-2010, 10:46 AM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 20,922
The word decimate is an English word. It has Latin roots but here's the thing you must always remember: the original meaning of the roots of a word count for nothing when modern definitions are created. That means that English speakers and writers get to decide what decimate's meaning is. They started using it to mean a large decrease in - and by extension 1/10 - as long ago as the 17th century. Anybody who doesn't understand this or disputes this doesn't understand how the English language properly works.

There is also a word mean to cut in half. It is halve. That's been around since at least 1300.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-09-2010, 10:51 AM
KneadToKnow KneadToKnow is offline
Voodoo Adult (Slight Return)
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 20,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rigamarole View Post
Had a very precise definition. That definition has changed/evolved. Go ahead and look it up; even the dictionary acknowledges as much.
Thank god I wasn't the only one. This is almost verbatim what I came in to say.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-09-2010, 11:16 AM
Valgard Valgard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
There is also a word mean to cut in half. It is halve. That's been around since at least 1300.
How about "bisect" and "split"? Related for other fractions would be "trisect" and "quarter", and I'm sure there are many more such.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-09-2010, 11:33 AM
Earl Snake-Hips Tucker Earl Snake-Hips Tucker is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToborAton View Post
(2) If not, could we make one up?
Most definitely. And it would probably be cromulently understandable. However, making it a common enough word for dictionary editors to include it is an entirely different matter.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-09-2010, 11:33 AM
Shot From Guns Shot From Guns is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
"Is there a word like decimate for an order of magnitude reduction?"

Yes. It's "decimate," in the original sense of the word.

An order of magnitude reduction, in base 10, is a reduction by 10%. 100,000 is one order of magnitude smaller than 1,000,000, for example.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-09-2010, 11:35 AM
ToborAton ToborAton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
There is also a word mean to cut in half. It is halve.
I don't see how does that helps me answer the related questions. If you can see how you from half to anything related then you should probably explain it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valgard View Post
How about "bisect" and "split"? Related for other fractions would be "trisect" and "quarter", and I'm sure there are many more such.
Thanks for ignoring the thread hijackers and making an honest attempt! I take it you are suggesting decisect as an answer to (1)? Nifty word but I kind of feel like N-sect turns a single thing into a collection of N things. For example, if you bisect a cake you are left with two pieces of cake. Do you still think it works?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-09-2010, 11:37 AM
dracoi dracoi is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
... how the English language properly works.
I think you win for best oxymoron of the day!

And you're correct. My pet peeve, though, is when people are writing about Roman times and then use decimate in its modern meaning. I suppose it's still technically correct, but if someone says "the Roman army was decimated" I really think they ought to have the Roman definition of the word in mind.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-09-2010, 11:38 AM
Omar Little Omar Little is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToborAton View Post
I'm not sure I have ever actually used the word except to talk about the word.
How sad. I use it frequently in describing a complete lopsided victory in sports.
Quote:
e.g. The Cowboys decimated the Redskins this weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-09-2010, 11:44 AM
ToborAton ToborAton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shot From Guns View Post
An order of magnitude reduction, in base 10, is a reduction by 10%. 100,000 is one order of magnitude smaller than 1,000,000, for example.
Take ten pennies and reduce that collection by 10% and you have 9 pennies left. Reduction means subtraction: So 100% - 10% = 90%.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-09-2010, 11:51 AM
scr4 scr4 is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shot From Guns View Post
An order of magnitude reduction, in base 10, is a reduction by 10%. 100,000 is one order of magnitude smaller than 1,000,000, for example.
By that definition, a 2-orders of magnitude reduction would be a 1% reduction, and 3 orders of magnitude reduction would be a 0.1% reduction?? I don't think so...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-09-2010, 11:57 AM
KneadToKnow KneadToKnow is offline
Voodoo Adult (Slight Return)
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 20,793
I was taught that "order of magnitude" referred to the exponent in a scientific notation ... um ... formula.

So, 1,000,000 (1x106) reduced by one order of magnitude would be 1x105 or 100,000. Is that not right?

Last edited by KneadToKnow; 07-09-2010 at 11:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-09-2010, 11:59 AM
ToborAton ToborAton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToborAton View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
There is also a word mean to cut in half. It is halve.
I don't see how does that helps me answer the related questions. If you can see how you from half to anything related then you should probably explain it.
So I might have dismissed "half" too quickly. A tenth clearly has the meaning I am looking for in (1). If nobody else can come up with anything better then I just have to start getting you people to allow it as a verb.

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-09-2010, 12:00 PM
TriPolar TriPolar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: rhode island
Posts: 19,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToborAton View Post
I don't see how does that helps me answer the related questions. If you can see how you from half to anything related then you should probably explain it.
'Halve' works as an order of magnitude in binary, so if you're writing on a computer, just use that.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-09-2010, 12:05 PM
Exapno Mapcase Exapno Mapcase is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY but not NYC
Posts: 20,922
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToborAton View Post
(3/4) What about a word that means to reduce by/to 1/2? Is (3) Bimate?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
There is also a word mean to cut in half. It is halve. That's been around since at least 1300.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToborAton View Post
I don't see how does that helps me answer the related questions. If you can see how you from half to anything related then you should probably explain it.
I'm not sure what there is to explain. The equivalent of decimate for "reduce to 1/10" is halve for "reduce to 1/2". There are many other words for the act of cutting in half, but none are as precisely equivalent and none of them end in -mate. The English language decided that centuries ago.

The orders of magnitude question is also straightforward. You multiply by 10 for each order of magnitude larger and divide by ten for each order of magnitude lower.

0.1 is one order of magnitude lower than 1. 0.01 is two orders of magnitude lower, 0.001 is three orders of magnitude lower. (A 90% reduction, a 99% reduction, and a 99.9% reduction.) There are no common - or even uncommon, to my knowledge - words for cutting to one hundredth or one thousandth.

ETA: To tenth is not a English word. Tenth has no verb form in English.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-09-2010, 12:09 PM
Quercus Quercus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shot From Guns View Post
"Is there a word like decimate for an order of magnitude reduction?"

Yes. It's "decimate," in the original sense of the word.

An order of magnitude reduction, in base 10, is a reduction by 10%. 100,000 is one order of magnitude smaller than 1,000,000, for example.
I think very few people who use 'order of magnitude' as a regular part of their speech would agree with you.
To me, and I think to most other physicists/engineers/people who use 'order of magnitude', an order of magnitude reduction would be understood as a reduction to a (one) smaller order of magnitude, for example from 1,000,000 to 100,000, which is a 90% reduction. As pointed out, this is consistent with a two orders of magnitude reduction being a reduction to 1/100th of the original, three orders of magnitude reduction being a reduction to 1/1,000th of the original, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-09-2010, 12:36 PM
ToborAton ToborAton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
I'm not sure what there is to explain. The equivalent of decimate for "reduce to 1/10" is halve for "reduce to 1/2". There are many other words for the act of cutting in half, but none are as precisely equivalent and none of them end in -mate. The English language decided that centuries ago.
I asked four questions which all orbited around a central theme. I numbered them to make sure people would see all of them. You answered one of them without acknowledging the theme. I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt by assuming that maybe the answer you gave hinted at a way to answer the questions to which you didn't respond.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exapno Mapcase View Post
ETA: To tenth is not a English word. Tenth has no verb form in English.
It will be after I have tenned the number of people using it enough to get it added to whatever dictionary you consider authoritative. Not sure if you've noticed but it can be changed.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-09-2010, 01:03 PM
Attack from the 3rd dimension Attack from the 3rd dimension is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
I only use it when something has been reduce by 1/10th. That way you can say:"It was literally decimated" and start off two word-use arguments at once.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-09-2010, 02:06 PM
Shot From Guns Shot From Guns is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Argh, I had a whole bunch of replies typed up, and then started pulling together one final concrete mathematical example, which then caused me to realize that my brain has apparently decided to take a vacation because it's Friday.

Honestly, I don't know what the hell I was thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-09-2010, 02:14 PM
Peremensoe Peremensoe is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Attack from the 3rd dimension View Post
I only use it when something has been reduce by 1/10th. That way you can say:"It was literally decimated" and start off two word-use arguments at once.
I hope that, someday, I am present when something has been reduced by exactly a tenth--and I remember to say this.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-09-2010, 02:34 PM
Shot From Guns Shot From Guns is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
To clarify: I had the correct conception of reducing by an order of magnitude the whole time, which is why I was particularly baffled by some of replies. For some reason, my brain decided to also think of decimation as dividing by 10, as opposed to dividing by 10 and then subtracting that number to leave the 90% as the remainder.

So, yeah, sorry about that ToborAton.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-09-2010, 02:41 PM
not_alice not_alice is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToborAton View Post
It will be after I have tenned the number of people using it enough to get it added to whatever dictionary you consider authoritative. Not sure if you've noticed but it can be changed.
hey this is the internet! We are all tenners!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-09-2010, 02:50 PM
ToborAton ToborAton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by not_alice View Post
hey this is the internet! We are all tenners!
Wow the rest of the Internet is already tenning!? I should be ecstatic but I know the internet and there's no way they are tenning the right way.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-09-2010, 03:09 PM
ToborAton ToborAton is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToborAton View Post
Wow the rest of the Internet is already tenning!? I should be ecstatic but I know the internet and there's no way they are tenning the right way.
Problem solved!

MPSIMS "Happy Birthday: tenning and tenthing!"
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=570251
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.