The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-23-2010, 05:10 AM
thirdname thirdname is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
What is the meat yield of a whole chicken?

I can buy a whole chicken at the store for around $1/pound. Actual pure meat, things like boneless breasts, often cost $5+. What percentage of a whole chicken is actually meat, though, rather than skin, bones, and fat? I want to figure out how much I'm paying for a pound of meat when I buy the whole bird.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 08-23-2010, 05:27 AM
qpw3141 qpw3141 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
The best way to determine this would probably be to cook a bird, remove every piece of meat you intend to eat and weigh the remainder.

I think boneless breasts are the most expensive way of buying chicken - which is odd as it is the least flavoursome part.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-23-2010, 05:32 AM
Wallenstein Wallenstein is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
70:30 seems to be the most often quoted ratio between meat:carcas

But this does sound like a great home experiment to try - your definition of "meat" might vary to others (e.g. parson's nose, some people eat it and some discard it)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-23-2010, 07:08 AM
panache45 panache45 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NE Ohio (the 'burbs)
Posts: 22,731
First compare the whole chicken to the sum of its parts with bone/skin (breast with bone/skin, thighs with bone/skin, etc.). Then compare these parts to their boneless/skinless counterparts. Average these two sets of numbers, and you get the ratio of whole/boneless. Apply that to the whole chicken.

It's only an approximation, but you can do it without actually buying anything.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2010, 07:14 AM
Richard Pearse Richard Pearse is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kiwi in Adelaide
Posts: 8,059
Significantly more than my dog, which is lucky for the dog.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-23-2010, 07:26 AM
Sigmagirl Sigmagirl is offline
Go Tribe!
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Western Reserve
Posts: 8,173
Plus: Soup!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2010, 08:08 AM
lazybratsche lazybratsche is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigmagirl View Post
Plus: Soup!
Exactly. With one chicken carcass and your choice of slightly-past-their-prime vegetables from the bottom of your fridge, you can make 2-4 cups of good stock, depending on how much you cook it down and how big the chicken is. So you can get another few bucks worth out of that chicken.

I usually just keep a gallon-size bag in the freezer and toss in any bones (mostly chicken along with the odd beef or pork bone) and useful leftover bits of veggies. A full bag of bones and some additional veggies fills my stock pot, so in everything goes and several hours later you've got stock. In the fridge it lasts a week or two, or you can freeze it almost indefinitely.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-23-2010, 08:19 AM
Al Bundy Al Bundy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
More than 20%

I think the five to one ratio of cost you site includes a heavy premium.
Various pieces of the chicken have little meat. The wings have little meat. Breast and leg quarters have the most meat. And that $5/# meat has some water in it too.

I would guess a whole chicken would render no more than 50% of the weight in meat, perhaps even less. Cut off the skin and fat first. Cook well and lots of water comes out. Discard the bones and further non-edible portions and you don't have much left. I can buy 10# of frozen leg quarters at ALDI for $5.99. The yield is pretty good.

It's not a scam. People just need to understand what they are receiving.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-23-2010, 10:21 AM
Hampshire Hampshire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 9,439
(boy, I haven't done this in a long time)

meat yield.... band name!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-23-2010, 10:40 AM
JoelUpchurch JoelUpchurch is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
I have some oriental friends that are fond of chicken feet. I don't mention when I'm passing by the oriental supermarket anymore. They will ask me to pick up chicken feet and duck wings for them. The only thing worse than that is picking up live crabs.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-23-2010, 11:15 AM
dracoi dracoi is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by qpw3141 View Post
The best way to determine this would probably be to cook a bird, remove every piece of meat you intend to eat and weigh the remainder.

I think boneless breasts are the most expensive way of buying chicken - which is odd as it is the least flavoursome part.
Cooking it first would give you terrible results for the experiment. A lot of fat and water cooks out, but no bone.

For the OP, I can't do any better than the 1/3 bone ratio another poster mentioned. I would recommend asking your local butcher - after all, they have to know these things to price their meats effectively.

One thing to keep in mind is that the amount of meat per bone is higher in larger birds, which is true for turkeys too. So a 5-lb chicken is going to have a different ratio than a 3-lb one.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-23-2010, 01:52 PM
t-bonham@scc.net t-bonham@scc.net is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Also, a lot depends on the type of chickens. Like beef (dairy vs. meat), modern chickens have been bred to specialize. Chickens raised for meat will be significantly different than egg-laying chickens.

My mother used to have laying hens on the farm, fed mostly from kitchen scraps, and she butchered them in the fall. She said they produced so little meat that it took nearly a whole chicken per person for a meal. Not worth the effort she said, -- far better for soups or stews.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-23-2010, 02:46 PM
Omar Little Omar Little is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Buy a whole chicken and boil it or rotisserie it. De-bone it and weigh just the meat you consider edible. Take the price you paid for the chicken and divide it by the weight of edible meat. That's your cost / lb. of A.

Next buy a package of boneless skinless chicken meat you would otherwise use. Boil it or bake it and then weigh it. Take the price you paid and divide by the weight of the cooked boneless skinless meat. That's your cost / lb. of B.

I would expect A to be much less than B. The difference is the cost of de-boning and deskinning by the butcher. If the difference is less than your own time to de-bone and de-skin is worth, then let the butcher do it and by boneless skinless meat. If the difference is more than your own time is worth, buy the whole chicken and do it yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-23-2010, 03:53 PM
panache45 panache45 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NE Ohio (the 'burbs)
Posts: 22,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoelUpchurch View Post
I have some oriental friends that are fond of chicken feet. I don't mention when I'm passing by the oriental supermarket anymore. They will ask me to pick up chicken feet and duck wings for them. The only thing worse than that is picking up live crabs.
I grew up in a Jewish family, and when I was a kid we used to get freshly-killed whole chickens. Everything was intact except for the feathers (and the clucking). Lots of parts, including the feet, were made into chicken soup. And it's a good thing chickens have two feet, because my brother and I each got one.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-23-2010, 04:07 PM
Omar Little Omar Little is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by panache45 View Post
And it's a good thing chickens have two feet, because my brother and I each got one.
I've eaten chicken feet while in China. Surely you mean the leg. As the feet are not that tasty or meaty.

Last edited by Omar Little; 08-23-2010 at 04:07 PM.. Reason: fix broken nested quote
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-23-2010, 08:58 PM
JoelUpchurch JoelUpchurch is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilbo523 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by panache45 View Post
And it's a good thing chickens have two feet, because my brother and I each got one.
I've eaten chicken feet while in China. Surely you mean the leg. As the feet are not that tasty or meaty.
I was talking about actual feet. I recall she would boil the feet to soften them up first. I never observed the actual consumption process, so I can't say if they actually ate the feet or just sucked on them or something like that.

I googled chicken feet recipes and got 280,000 hits.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-23-2010, 09:09 PM
TriPolar TriPolar is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
50% useable meat is a good figure, especially if you are removing the skin. If your trying to figure out how many people can be fed, use the 50% figure. Larger chickens should yield more. And as people have mentioned, every thing that can't cleanly be seperated as meat, is still useful for making stock. If you like dark meat, you can probably get thighs for well under $1 a pound, and a yield of more than 50% of meat per pound.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-29-2010, 02:29 PM
Wallenstein Wallenstein is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
I did a "sort of" experiment today.

I bought a 1.36kg chicken and poached it for 1hr20m in water (with herbs, onions and carrots etc).

Once it was done I separated the meat from the bones.

I ended up with 450g of usable meat and 450g of bones/skin etc (the latter includes some of the weird dark meat which some people might eat).

That left 450g unaccounted for but I did end up with 3 litres of top notch stock for soup / risotto etc. I presume the extra is fat and moisture which has been added to the stock.

We paid 3.79 for the chicken, which works out at 2.79/kg uncooked weight.

So for 3.79 we got 450g of usable meat, which works out at 8.40/kg.

A pack of chicken breasts (of equivalent quality*) costs 10.99/kg uncooked.

However, a pack of similar chicken thighs is only 3.49/kg uncooked.

This size chicken would probably feed 2-3 people so a larger bird would give you more bang for your buck.

So overall it looks like you get a slightly better deal with a whole chicken than with just chicken breasts, but an equivalent mix of thigh, drumstick and breast might be about the same.

Of course you don't get all that lovely stock with the pre-packaged portions.

*Not free-range or organic, but one step up from mass-produced broilers.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.