I’d say he was being honest. Whether or not being honest is enough to get someone fired is a different question. I personally think NPR went off the deep end in firing the guy.
Well, he certainly shouldn’t have been fired for thoughtcrime. Now, if he discussed his bigotry on a national broadcast, then maybe he should have been fired; but of course, he didn’t do that.
Juan Williams has a right to express whatever bigotry he wants, but NPR doesn’t have to pay him for it. That kind of statement hurts his credibility as a commentator and alienates the audience.
They may have had the right to do it, but it’s so over the top for NPR to fire someone who was telling the truth… and frankly, a truth probably shared by a majority of Americans.
Of course NPR is notoriously ultra-liberal, so it’s not surprising that they took the political correctness to an extreme. It will be a good day in this country when we finally de-fund them completely.
It’s only the truth insofar as he believes what he says. I think you’re interpreting his comments as “Americans should be nervous when they see people in Muslim clothing on planes” because that’s what you believe. He didn’t say that. He said he gets nervous when he’s in that situation. The part that bothers me isn’t the ‘I get nervous around Muslims on planes’ - I can understand having that impulse, and certainly the first time I flew after September 11th (which was nine days after the attacks), I would have been nervous in that situation. The part that bothers me is “they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims,” which is to say ‘if you wear that kind of clothing, you are saying you’re more of a Muslim than an American.’ That’s more of that dual loyalty bullshit, and it’s pretty stupid.
It seems that it was thoughtcrime, then. Williams even included the standard (and quite sensible) disclaimer that one can’t blame all Muslims for terrorism.
I mention behavior because of a point that sometimes gets raised in discussions of liberal bias in the MSM. Sometimes, after it is pointed out that the overwhelming majority of prominent journalists and editors are Democrat and liberal, the counter is that this doesn’t matter unless you can point to examples of how this bias affects their coverage. (Not that such examples are hard to come by, but…)
But it appears that NPR doesn’t buy that as an excuse. They have no examples of how Williams’ attitude affected his coverage, or his decisions as a journalist, or anything like that. He just expressed an attitude, and they fired him.
The attitude he expressed was bigoted and destroyed his journalistic credibility (not that he’s had much left for the past several years since he became a shoeshine boy for Fox News).
Yeah, then right-wing stupidity can truly flourish unchecked.
Look, if you’re a news org, you can’t have members saying, “By the way, I really think the Dutch stink and you know they really want to stick their herrings in our wimmens.”
Being openly racist on TV undercuts the impartiality a newsman is supposed to have. NPR did a good thing here. If Brian Williams appeared on national TV saying that Blacks really seem lazy to him, it would be totally understandable to can him.
Oh please. A distinction without a difference, and you know it.
He’s nervous because people who dress like Muslims are probably muslim. And muslims are the ones who blew up the planes. I believe it’s the truth because he wouldn’t have said it otherwise (indeed, his politics suggest he’d go the other way) - I’m making no determination on how reasonable of a thought it is, but I believe that most Americans would feel similarly.
(Just as an aside, I’m sure it’s completely coincidental… weren’t they the guys sharing the Democatic National Committee fundraising list for their begathon?)