The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Mundane Pointless Stuff I Must Share (MPSIMS)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2010, 01:53 PM
Little Nemo Little Nemo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Western New York
Posts: 47,926
What if Victoria had been Queen of Hanover?

A historical what-if. Assume that Hanover did not have a salic law. William IV dies in 1837. Victoria becomes Queen of both the United Kingdom and the Kingdom of Hanover.

I think it's reasonable to assume she would have still lived to 1901 (although feel free to offer an opposing opinion). Which means she would have ruled Hanover through the period of German unification. How would that have affected Bismarck's plans? Would Bismarck have sought an accomodation with Victoria or would there have been an Anglo-Prussian confrontation? Maybe Germany would have united under Austria rather than Prussia. Or maybe not united at all. Or maybe there would have been a broader Anglo-German accord under the joint crown. A United Kingdom of Great Britain and Germany?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 12-14-2010, 02:20 PM
Baker Baker is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tottering-on-the-Brink
Posts: 12,565
Now that's a fascinating alternate history idea. I wish I was a good enough historian to give a plausible "history"

One idea though, Victoria had a LOT of kids. Could she have passed it on to one of them? Her oldest child, also named Victoria, became the mother of Kaiser Wilhelm II. Maybe when the younger Vickie married the title could have gone to her, as a sort of wedding present?

I'll bet it would have been hard to reign over both kingdoms.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-14-2010, 03:03 PM
RandMcnally RandMcnally is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
In my uninformed opinion, if she had been Queen of Hanover I don't think Germany would have formed around Prussia. The UK wanted peace on the continent more than anything and having a continental holding would have caused the UK to pay more attention and I think they would have restrained Prussia.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-14-2010, 03:08 PM
Little Nemo Little Nemo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Western New York
Posts: 47,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baker View Post
One idea though, Victoria had a LOT of kids. Could she have passed it on to one of them? Her oldest child, also named Victoria, became the mother of Kaiser Wilhelm II. Maybe when the younger Vickie married the title could have gone to her, as a sort of wedding present?
Normally you can't hand off a crown like that. It's a lifetime obligation.

And it's very likely that the Hohenzollerns would never have become Kaisers and Victoria might not have married Frederick.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baker View Post
I'll bet it would have been hard to reign over both kingdoms.
What had happened during the personal union period was the King lived in England and appointed a viceroy to rule Hanover on his behalf. Historically, that viceroy was Prince Adolphus, one of George III's sons. He was appointed by his father in 1816 and served as viceroy through the reigns of his father and his two brothers. When his older brother Ernest became King of Hanover in 1837 he ruled the kingdom directly and the position of viceroy was abolished. Apparently many Hanoverians prefered Adolphus and would have liked to skip over Ernest and give Adolphus the crown but Adolphus refused to usurp his brother's position.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-14-2010, 03:15 PM
Little Nemo Little Nemo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Western New York
Posts: 47,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandMcnally View Post
In my uninformed opinion, if she had been Queen of Hanover I don't think Germany would have formed around Prussia. The UK wanted peace on the continent more than anything and having a continental holding would have caused the UK to pay more attention and I think they would have restrained Prussia.
That's why I left Bismarck as an open question. Historically, he was able to match his loyalty to Prussia with the ideal of German unification (and his personal ambition). He united Germany under Prussian control as directed by himself.

What I wondered is if he could have seperated those loyalties if necessary. Would Bismarck have accepted Prussia being a lesser power in a Germany built around a Hanoverian axis with Victoria as nominal Empress of Germany and Bismarck running the country as her Prime Minister and/or Chancellor?

Last edited by Little Nemo; 12-14-2010 at 03:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-15-2010, 08:59 AM
Meurglys Meurglys is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,606
Judging by this map of the German states in 1837, Prussia was already in a very dominant position when Victoria would have assumed power.
Without checking, I'm not sure if all the pink bits are Prussian (Westfalia?) but at best I think you'd have a polarised position, with Prussia the dominant state and a Hanover-based rump in N.W. Germany controlling the Elbe and the North Sea ports.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-15-2010, 11:15 AM
Freddy the Pig Freddy the Pig is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
I don't think it would have made much difference. A male sovereign (or Victoria if allowed as Queen of Hanover) would have continued to employ a viceroy. As I understand it, Parliament was pretty adamant about not letting the Hanoverian connection influence British foreign policy.

And if the British government didn't care about it, why should Prussia? At most they might have allowed the Hanoverian monarchy to survive a la Bavaria, but still as part of the German Empire. And I don't see the British going to war to prevent that.

Last edited by Freddy the Pig; 12-15-2010 at 11:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-15-2010, 11:55 AM
Elendil's Heir Elendil's Heir is offline
SDSAB
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Diogenes Club
Posts: 38,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Nemo View Post
Normally you can't hand off a crown like that. It's a lifetime obligation.
I suppose Queen Victoria could have abdicated just from the throne of Hanover (and not from the British throne), and let her eldest child, Princess Victoria, become the new Queen of Hanover in her own right.

A related thread that may be of interest: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=588942
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.