It’s my understanding that in the US, the mainstream view among mental health professionals is that suicide is always the result of a diagnosable mental illness. I assume that this is based, to some extent, that most Americans practice a religion that considers suicide a sin, which would result in the person committing suicide going to hell as a result. For the record, I do not necessarily believe this, but for someone who does, suicide would seem especially irrational, and I assume this plays a large role in the mental health community’s stance.
However, how would a mental health professional explain the suicide of an individual from a culture that does not condemn, and might even encourage, committing suicide in certain circumstances, or if the act was done in a manner to achieve a certain objective (i.e. martyrdom). For example, the 9/11 hijackers were influenced by a culture that believes that they would actually be rewarded in the afterlife because they would be a killing people and attacking institutions that they considered to be “infidels”. Also, in Japan during WWII, Japanese pilots volunteered for kamikaze missions for similar reasons, and it is my understanding suicide is still honorable in Japan in situations where an individual has disgraced themselves or has otherwise landed in unfavorable circumstances, and would be stigmatized if they remained among the living.
Is the view that suicide is be rational under these circumstances, i.e. are kamikaze pilots, suicide bombers, etc., considered rational individuals that are simply products of an unfortunate environment? Is this viewed as a gray area, in that these certain cultures may do more to foster suicidal beliefs than our own, but mental illness is still the intervening factor at the individual decision making level? Or are cultural beliefs completely irrelevant?