The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-14-2011, 10:23 AM
Frylock Frylock is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
What percentage of wealth in the U.S. is inherited?

As the title asks.

A friend of mine is wondering about this. I thought I'd take it to the dope for him.

It might be good to have two separate figures--one for intra-familial inheritance, and one for inheritance in general. I'm not sure if he's thinking specifically of the former, or more generally of the latter.

Last edited by Frylock; 03-14-2011 at 10:23 AM..
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 03-14-2011, 11:16 AM
engineer_comp_geek engineer_comp_geek is online now
Robot Mod in Beta Testing
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 8,875
You may find this interesting:
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2008/01/...herited-money/

Quote:
1. According to a study of Federal Reserve data conducted by NYU professor Edward Wolff, for the nation’s richest 1%, inherited wealth accounted for only 9% of their net worth in 2001, down from 23% in 1989. (The 2001 number was the latest available.)

2. According to a study by Prince & Associates, less than 10% of today’s multi-millionaires cited “inheritance” as their source of wealth.

3. A study by Spectrem Group found that among today’s millionaires, inherited wealth accounted for just 2% of their total sources of wealth.
The article basically concludes from this that inheritance is not the main driver of today's wealth.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-14-2011, 11:33 AM
njtt njtt is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by engineer_comp_geek View Post
You may find this interesting:
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2008/01/...herited-money/

The article basically concludes from this that inheritance is not the main driver of today's wealth.
But how many of the people who have "made" large amounts of money themselves (from investments, or whatever) were only able to get started because they inherited enough to get them securely started in their business career? Generally speaking, it is a lot easier for someone who starts out rich to get richer (sometimes a lot richer) than it is for someone who starts out poor to get rich.

Therefore a simple comparison of how much of people's wealth has actually been inherited to the amount that has been "earned" during their lifetime underestimates the importance of inheritance to the distribution of wealth.

Last edited by njtt; 03-14-2011 at 11:36 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-14-2011, 12:03 PM
Quercus Quercus is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
First, for point 2, no matter how many advantages they got from their family, how many people would willingly cite 'inheritance' as their source of wealth? I'm pretty sure there exists at least one rich person who honestly admits they were lucky and maybe didn't deserve it, but I'm not sure there's more than one.

Second, there's a difference between the amount of cash directly inherited upon a relative's death, and the total amount of advantage gained from one's family. I mean, George W Bush probably hasn't inherited much cash in the strictest sense, but there's little doubt that he would be much much much less wealthy if he'd had a different last name.

If you want to avoid having to decide exactly what counts as 'inherited wealth', you could look at what's called 'intergenerational mobility', which just looks at to what extent rich people tend to be children of other rich people.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-14-2011, 12:11 PM
Hermitian Hermitian is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by njtt View Post
Therefore a simple comparison of how much of people's wealth has actually been inherited to the amount that has been "earned" during their lifetime underestimates the importance of inheritance to the distribution of wealth.
I think the first response accurately answered the question. However, I do agree that there is a little more it that that. I am guessing that the majority of those with very large net worth that did not inherit a vast sum of money were able to utilize opportunities that others were not able to.

I do not know much about the founding of Microsoft, but Bill Gates Sr. was a successful lawyer. I am sure Bill Gates Jr. could have easily walked up to him and asked for a $20,000 loan to help get his business off the ground, and that loan could make all the difference. If you grew up in the ghetto, that is not something you can ask your father.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-14-2011, 12:22 PM
thelabdude thelabdude is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Check the stories of the Forbes 400. Go to www.forbes.com and scroll to the bottom.

While many members were at least middle class, many started with very little. Others, perhaps an education and intelligence were more important than wealth.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-14-2011, 02:51 PM
OldGuy OldGuy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Very east of Foggybog, WI
Posts: 2,917
I would dare say that most very wealthy people transfer a substantial portion of their wealth by various means to their heirs before they die. This wealth would not be inherited wealth.

In addition there is a huge accounting issue lurking in the background. Suppose I inherit $1 million at age 25 and earn $100,000 every year in salary spending it all every year so I still have $1 million in savings. When I'm 35 I could claim either that I spent my inheritance and that I earned every penny of the entire $1 million I have or that all of my wealth is inherited, or anything in between. Afterall who is to say which dollars I actually spent.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-14-2011, 03:20 PM
BwanaBob BwanaBob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York & Maryland
Posts: 3,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldGuy View Post
I would dare say that most very wealthy people transfer a substantial portion of their wealth by various means to their heirs before they die. This wealth would not be inherited wealth.

In addition there is a huge accounting issue lurking in the background. Suppose I inherit $1 million at age 25 and earn $100,000 every year in salary spending it all every year so I still have $1 million in savings. When I'm 35 I could claim either that I spent my inheritance and that I earned every penny of the entire $1 million I have or that all of my wealth is inherited, or anything in between. Afterall who is to say which dollars I actually spent.
Normally such monies are commingled, and I doubt you could make such a claim with a straight face.

I think the OP is really looking for % of wealthy people who got a significant boost from their family to launch their own success. Bill Gates would be such an example. I'd bet there are not a lot of Thomas Edison success stories amongst the current wealthy elite. They're just good as hiding and passing the money along, occasionally bankrolling further successes. Many have deep enough family pockets that they can afford early setbacks and they persevere; others without that resource whither away.

Last edited by BwanaBob; 03-14-2011 at 03:21 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.