The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Mundane Pointless Stuff I Must Share (MPSIMS)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-22-2011, 11:12 AM
Mamavalveeta03 Mamavalveeta03 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Why is underwear called "a pair" when it's just one item?

The other day, my husband asked me if he had a pair of underwear that was clean. I said, "Yes," and handed him 2 undergarments. He looked very puzzled and inquired, "Why did you give me 2?"

"You asked for a pair. That's 2. That's what I gave you."

We've now had a running argument for the past several days over whether or not underwear (aka: panties, undies, boxers, etc.) should be called "a pair." I say no, and he obviously says yes. I hope someone has the answer to this one, and how DID underwear come to be called "pair" when there is only one item?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 10-22-2011, 11:22 AM
Indian Indian is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Probably because it was made by joining 2 pieces in early years, similar to a pair of scissors.
But I haven't heard a 'pair of underwear' in usage.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-22-2011, 11:26 AM
gazpacho gazpacho is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 5,088
There is a column about this question:

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/...ly-one-of-them

Basically because we call pants a pair of pants and that stuck with underwear.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-22-2011, 11:28 AM
Chefguy Chefguy is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 28,494
Add "a pair of pants" to the argument and merriment will surely ensue. It's common usage is all. Insisting that it's wrong will just get you pitying looks from those to whom you are speaking.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-22-2011, 12:41 PM
Sarabellum1976 Sarabellum1976 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Victoria's Secret definitely avoids the use of "pair" when describing their sales. I always thought that was kind of amusing.

"Buy 3, get 1 panty for free" and other odd-sounding phrases, very common in their fliers. I'm sure the general idea is avoid morons who don't understand that a "pair" of panties is only one garment!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-22-2011, 12:54 PM
postcards postcards is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The other Long Beach.
Posts: 3,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefguy View Post
Add "a pair of pants" to the argument and merriment will surely ensue. It's common usage is all. Insisting that it's wrong will just get you pitying looks from those to whom you are speaking.
Because you have a left pant leg and a right pant leg which gives you a pair of 'pants'.

That's how I always saw it.
__________________
Talking Pictures
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-22-2011, 01:24 PM
Brown Eyed Girl Brown Eyed Girl is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by postcards View Post
Because you have a left pant leg and a right pant leg which gives you a pair of 'pants'.

That's how I always saw it.
Has there ever been a time when it was fashionable to wear only one pant leg?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-22-2011, 01:36 PM
Shodan Shodan is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 25,565
Yes, if you are Long John Silver.

Regards,
Shodan
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-22-2011, 02:54 PM
RealityChuck RealityChuck is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA
Posts: 35,471
If you were an archer, you could have handed him three arrows, since "a pair of arrows" refers to three of them.
__________________
Author of Staroamer's Fate and Syron's Fate, now back in print.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-22-2011, 03:15 PM
postcards postcards is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The other Long Beach.
Posts: 3,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown Eyed Girl View Post
Has there ever been a time when it was fashionable to wear only one pant leg?
A tailor would refer to a single leg as a 'pant leg'.

And according to The Free Online Dictionary:
Quote:
Word History: One would not expect a word for a modern article of clothing to come ultimately from the name of a 4th-century Roman Catholic saint, but that is the case with the word pants. It can be traced back to Pantaleon, the patron saint of Venice. He became so closely associated with the inhabitants of that city that the Venetians were popularly known as Pantaloni. Consequently, among the commedia dell'arte's stock characters the representative Venetian (a stereotypically wealthy but miserly merchant) was called Pantalone, or Pantalon in French. In the mid-17th century the French came to identify him with one particular style of trousers, a style which became known as pantaloons in English. Pantaloons was later applied to another style that came into fashion in the late 18th century, tight-fitting garments that had begun to replace knee breeches. After that pantaloons was used to refer to trousers in general. The abbreviation of pantaloons to pants met with some resistance at first; it was considered vulgar and, as Oliver Wendell Holmes put it, "a word not made for gentlemen, but 'gents.'" First found in the writings of Edgar Allan Poe in 1840, pants has replaced the "gentleman's word" in English and has lost all obvious connection to Saint Pantaleon.
__________________
Talking Pictures
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-22-2011, 03:25 PM
IvoryTowerDenizen IvoryTowerDenizen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Shore of LI
Posts: 13,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by indian View Post
Probably because it was made by joining 2 pieces in early years, similar to a pair of scissors.
But I haven't heard a 'pair of underwear' in usage.
A pair of underwear is the only way I refer to it. Otherwise what? An underwear?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-22-2011, 03:34 PM
Rigamarole Rigamarole is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chefguy View Post
Add "a pair of pants" to the argument and merriment will surely ensue. It's common usage is all. Insisting that it's wrong will just get you pitying looks from those to whom you are speaking.
This. I'm wondering if the OP was seriously unaware of the standard usage, or was just being intentionally obtuse/dickish in that interaction.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-22-2011, 03:47 PM
astro astro is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rigamarole View Post
This. I'm wondering if the OP was seriously unaware of the standard usage, or was just being intentionally obtuse/dickish in that interaction.
Seriously. A "pair of underwear" as a reference to a single set of briefs is such common usage I'd think anyone handing me two sets of briefs when I asked for "a pair of underwear" was borderline retarded.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:06 PM
brittekland brittekland is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
For many non-English speaking people around the world, the whole plural concept such as "a pair of" pants, scissors or even shoes let alone things like underwears is very peculiar thing. I may be wrong but in most of non-english languages it's just a pant (you don't count legs; it's just one connected, one piece of clothing). A scissor, not a pair of scissors and shoe, not a pair of shoes; the fact that shoes are normally a pair is a "goes without saying" fact. When one is asked about one particular shoe then you address it as one of the pair. How often people talk about one leg of a pair of pants? I too come to think it's waste of words if efficiency and speed is a part of the criteria.

I'm all for trimming and streamlining fat off English language. It will probably happen soon enough in our age of *texting while driving*. 'A pant' is so much shorter than 'a pair of pants'.

Last edited by brittekland; 10-22-2011 at 04:10 PM.. Reason: 80-90%
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-22-2011, 05:16 PM
CrazyCatLady CrazyCatLady is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mamavalveeta03 View Post
We've now had a running argument for the past several days over whether or not underwear (aka: panties, undies, boxers, etc.) should be called "a pair." I say no, and he obviously says yes. I hope someone has the answer to this one, and how DID underwear come to be called "pair" when there is only one item?
The answer depends on whether you want to use the singular or plural form of whatever term you use for your underclothing. If you're going to talk about panties, or undies, or boxers, or underpants, then clearly your underwear is plural and you don't get to be all snarky about them coming in pairs. If, however, you talk about a panty, or an undy, or a boxer, or an underpant, then snark on him all you want.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-24-2011, 03:59 PM
The Devil's Grandmother The Devil's Grandmother is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by astro View Post
Seriously. A "pair of underwear" as a reference to a single set of briefs is such common usage I'd think anyone handing me two sets of briefs when I asked for "a pair of underwear" was borderline retarded.
Even if English was not his first language?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:05 PM
Dolores Reborn Dolores Reborn is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 13,862
The "pair" rule doesn't apply to upper garments for some reason. I have two sleeves in my shirt, but I don't have a pair of shirts. Bra is singular, camisole is singular, blouse is singular.

But you have a pair of earrings.

This English - she is weird.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:13 PM
Lukeinva Lukeinva is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by postcards View Post
Because you have a left pant leg and a right pant leg which gives you a pair of 'pants'.

That's how I always saw it.
But aha! Ads... say like in GQ magazine... where models are standing dockside ... modeling ... the caption might say, "Pant by Ralph Loraine."

How do you explain that non-plural use?

Last edited by Lukeinva; 10-24-2011 at 04:13 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:16 PM
Dolores Reborn Dolores Reborn is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 13,862
I've noticed that on What Not to Wear - they call it a pant, too. Maybe the fashion world is changing the language?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:48 PM
ThisSpaceForRent ThisSpaceForRent is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
I am standing here in my underwear...

I am standing here in my pair of underwear...

You decide.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:51 PM
Jackmannii Jackmannii is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mamavalveeta03 View Post
The other day, my husband asked me if he had a pair of underwear that was clean. I said, "Yes," and handed him 2 undergarments. He looked very puzzled and inquired, "Why did you give me 2?"

"You asked for a pair. That's 2. That's what I gave you."

We've now had a running argument for the past several days over whether or not underwear (aka: panties, undies, boxers, etc.) should be called "a pair." I say no, and he obviously says yes.
I say this marriage is doomed.

If you insist on altering classic usage, what happens to the phrase "Don't get your undies in a bunch"? Is it then "Don't get your undy in a bunch"? That's pathetic.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-24-2011, 05:01 PM
aceplace57 aceplace57 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
I require a pair of boxers for my pair of testicles.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-24-2011, 05:50 PM
Rigamarole Rigamarole is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThisSpaceForRent View Post
I am standing here in my underwear...

I am standing here in my pair of underwear...

You decide.
How many underwears are you wearing?

One underwear? Just an underwear isn't enough! You need a pair of underwear.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-24-2011, 06:17 PM
IvoryTowerDenizen IvoryTowerDenizen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Shore of LI
Posts: 13,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThisSpaceForRent View Post
I am standing here in my underwear...

I am standing here in my pair of underwear...

You decide.
But if someone asked for a pair of underwear, I would immediately assume one article of clothing.

How many underwear do I have?
How many pairs of underwear do I have?

I know which sounds right to my ear.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-25-2011, 12:05 AM
Gary T Gary T is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: KCMO
Posts: 9,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolores Reborn View Post
The "pair" rule doesn't apply to upper garments for some reason. I have two sleeves in my shirt, but I don't have a pair of shirts. Bra is singular, camisole is singular, blouse is singular.
Interesting observation.

Quote:
But you have a pair of earrings.

This English - she is weird.
Weird how? The earrings, unlike your previous examples, are TWO (count 'em, two!) SEPARATE items. On what planet would it be weird to call them a pair?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-25-2011, 01:20 AM
scootergirl scootergirl is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceplace57 View Post
I require a pair of boxers for my pair of testicles.
....and your pair of cheeks.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-25-2011, 01:33 AM
scootergirl scootergirl is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazpacho View Post
There is a column about this question:

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/...ly-one-of-them

Basically because we call pants a pair of pants and that stuck with underwear.
Thanks for posting this. Interesting read. English is my second language and I love to learn about the origins of words....whether they are rational or not, it's most often entertaining.

Last edited by scootergirl; 10-25-2011 at 01:34 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-25-2011, 02:57 AM
WotNot WotNot is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northumbria
Posts: 2,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by IvoryTowerDenizen View Post
A pair of underwear is the only way I refer to it. Otherwise what? An underwear?
I can't speak for indian, but for me the odd word in the sentence isn't "pair", but "underwear".

"Pair of pants" would be fine, or "underpants", "panties", "shorts", "briefs" – anything of that sort.

"Underwear" is, for me, too broad and non-specific a category to go with the word "pair", since it encompasses undershirts, bras, slips, petticoats, garter belts etc, none of which are generally thought of as a pair.

If I were in the position of Mamavalveeta03's husband, I would have asked if I had "a clean pair of (under)pants" or "any clean underwear" (or "some clean underwear").
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-25-2011, 04:09 AM
Nava Nava is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by brittekland View Post
For many non-English speaking people around the world, the whole plural concept such as "a pair of" pants, scissors or even shoes let alone things like underwears is very peculiar thing. I may be wrong but in most of non-english languages it's just a pant (you don't count legs; it's just one connected, one piece of clothing).
In Spanish it can be single, or a pair, or plural. Este pantalón refers to these trousers, este par de pantalones refers to the same trousers, estos pantalones can refer to those same trousers again or to several pairs. You usually can figure out which either from context or because there is more information provided. Pantyhose is paired or plural, panties can be singular or plural but not paired, bras are singular, men's shorts-briefs-etc are plural or paired.

Same in Catalan, not surprisingly (the majority of Catalan speakers are bilingual with Spanish; not only is there a common origin but a lot of cross-pollination between the two languages).
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-25-2011, 07:04 AM
Dolores Reborn Dolores Reborn is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Houston
Posts: 13,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary T View Post
Interesting observation.


Weird how? The earrings, unlike your previous examples, are TWO (count 'em, two!) SEPARATE items. On what planet would it be weird to call them a pair?
Not weird that earrings are counted as a pair, weird that some things are pairs and some things aren't.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-25-2011, 08:33 AM
postcards postcards is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The other Long Beach.
Posts: 3,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukeinva View Post
But aha! Ads... say like in GQ magazine... where models are standing dockside ... modeling ... the caption might say, "Pant by Ralph Loraine."

How do you explain that non-plural use?
Pretentiousness. Or one-legged models.

And who the heck is 'Ralph Loraine'? You mean that Lifshitz guy from the Bronx?
__________________
Talking Pictures
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-25-2011, 11:18 AM
Brown Eyed Girl Brown Eyed Girl is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by postcards View Post
Pretentiousness. Or one-legged models.
Bah! It's cleaner, more consistent usage minimizing qualifiers that don't actually say anything about the product. Seeing as how one-legged pants aren't marketed, it's superfluous to refer to a pant as a pair. You should expect a two-legged pant.

And what about underpants? No pair present.

Do you refer to your legs as a pair? No. They come in pairs. No need to point that out in language.

Last edited by Brown Eyed Girl; 10-25-2011 at 11:19 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-25-2011, 03:30 PM
overlyverbose overlyverbose is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
OP: Have you never heard it called a pair of underwear or a pair of pants? Really? I assumed that was the most common usage.

To me, it sounds like you're nitpicking. If you've really never heard that usage before, you're the first person I've ever encountered who (presumably) has English as a first language and has never heard the term "pair of underwear."

Oh, and on preview: your husband is right. One item is a pair of underwear. No, it doesn't necessarily make sense, but neither do a lot of things in the English language.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-25-2011, 04:28 PM
Sternvogel Sternvogel is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by IvoryTowerDenizen View Post
How many underwear do I have?
How many pairs of underwear do I have?

I know which sounds right to my ear.
Well, the first option would be rephrased as "How much underwear do I have?" I could see myself asking that question.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-25-2011, 09:15 PM
jasg jasg is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Upper left hand corner
Posts: 2,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceplace57 View Post
I require a pair of boxers for my pair of testicles.
Quote:
Originally Posted by scootergirl View Post
....and your pair of cheeks.
In this case, why has no one in this thread commented on the oddity that brassiere is singular...
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-25-2011, 09:43 PM
Brown Eyed Girl Brown Eyed Girl is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasg View Post
In this case, why has no one in this thread commented on the oddity that brassiere is singular...
Posts #17, #28, and #29.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-26-2011, 05:46 PM
Bookkeeper Bookkeeper is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ottawa, Canuckistan
Posts: 2,264
This is usage retained from several centuries past when men's nether garments did come in pairs. The Robin Hood-style "men in tights" were wearing what were essentially a pair of hip-length stockings laced to the bottom of their shirts or to a belt. People kept on referring to them as a "pair" even after the separate legs were merged into a single garment.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.