The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Mundane Pointless Stuff I Must Share (MPSIMS)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:44 AM
Dr. Strangelove Dr. Strangelove is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Someone on NASA TV yelled HOLY SHIT! I must concur.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #152  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:44 AM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Covered_In_Bees! View Post
Yeah science!
And engineering!
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:46 AM
Onomatopoeia Onomatopoeia is offline
私は女性の香りが大好きです
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 小浜国
Posts: 4,485
No one had time to say "Pics, or it didn't happen" before there were pics!
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:47 AM
MEBuckner MEBuckner is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 9,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tangent View Post
That is very cool! Damn, looking at that altitude number dropping really gives you an idea of how fast that thing is moving.
Oh, I know. It's AMAZING how fast it went from "Thousands of miles out in space, moving at 12,000 miles an hour" to "Touchdown!" (I think at one point they said it was pulling 11 or 12 gees.)


Congratulations, wolfstu, and IvoryTowerDenizen's colleague's husband and fachverwirrt's good friend and good friend's boyfriend, and all the rest of you guys.

We're a pretty cool species sometimes.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:47 AM
cmyk cmyk is offline
4 out of 5 Jesuses agree!
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 10,101
Yeh, yeh, yeh... Years of hard work... Solving impossible problems of engineering and rocketry... Blah blah blah. We all know it's the peanuts.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:48 AM
Askance Askance is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,259
The bloody probe twittered the news itself!
Quote:
Curiosity Rover

@MarsCuriosity
I'm safely on the surface of Mars. GALE CRATER I AM IN YOU!!! #MSL
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:49 AM
Shakes Shakes is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas Tx.
Posts: 7,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onomatopoeia View Post
No one had time to say "Pics, or it didn't happen" before there were pics!
I'd like to see some pics. My computer at work doesn't allow java or adobe.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:49 AM
voltaire voltaire is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
So, being nuclear powered and all, what's the life-expectancy of this baby?
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:50 AM
Zebra Zebra is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: LIC
Posts: 19,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by voltaire View Post
So, being nuclear powered and all, what's the life-expectancy of this baby?
2 years
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:50 AM
D-bear D-bear is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 556
Take that Martin Hyde!
Reply With Quote
  #161  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:50 AM
Covered_In_Bees! Covered_In_Bees! is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Askance View Post
The bloody probe twittered the news itself!
It's like a well-behaved child, letting us know when it got to its destination safely.
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:50 AM
MEBuckner MEBuckner is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 9,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmyk View Post
Yeh, yeh, yeh... Years of hard work... Solving impossible problems of engineering and rocketry... Blah blah blah. We all know it's the peanuts.
At least they kept the part about the "lucky underwear (unwashed since 1964)" to themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:50 AM
Declan Declan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
What was supposed to happen to the sky crane part, the animation says it was supposed to fly away from the rover, after it touched down. Did the rockets have enough juice to make orbit again, just to burn up.

Declan
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:51 AM
cmyk cmyk is offline
4 out of 5 Jesuses agree!
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 10,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Askance View Post
The bloody probe twittered the news itself!
He's hip with the kids these days... Aaand, knows better than to tweet and land.
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:52 AM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakes View Post
I'd like to see some pics. My computer at work doesn't allow java or adobe.
If you're on Facebook, "NASA’s Curiosity Mars Rover" just posted it.
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:52 AM
squeegee squeegee is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Gilroy CA
Posts: 7,294
Congrats, NASA. Thanks for making us proud.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:52 AM
Dr. Strangelove Dr. Strangelove is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Declan View Post
What was supposed to happen to the sky crane part, the animation says it was supposed to fly away from the rover, after it touched down. Did the rockets have enough juice to make orbit again, just to burn up.

Declan
No; it has just enough fuel to veer away to the side and not impact the rover itself. It'll crash land some distance away. Maybe the rover will visit the wreckage.
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:52 AM
Askance Askance is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Declan
What was supposed to happen to the sky crane part, the animation says it was supposed to fly away from the rover, after it touched down. Did the rockets have enough juice to make orbit again, just to burn up.
No, just enough to get out of the way. In any case, there's not nearly enough atmosphere on Mars to burn up anything that size.

Last edited by Askance; 08-06-2012 at 12:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:52 AM
cmyk cmyk is offline
4 out of 5 Jesuses agree!
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 10,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEBuckner View Post
At least they kept the part about the "lucky underwear (unwashed since 1964)" to themselves.
**khaack**
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:53 AM
Zerc Zerc is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pretoria, Gauteng
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Declan View Post
What was supposed to happen to the sky crane part, the animation says it was supposed to fly away from the rover, after it touched down. Did the rockets have enough juice to make orbit again, just to burn up.

Declan
I believe it flies up and crashes down on the surface a short distance away, it does not go into orbit.
Reply With Quote
  #171  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:54 AM
cmyk cmyk is offline
4 out of 5 Jesuses agree!
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 10,101
Mmmm... Look at all those MacBooks...
Reply With Quote
  #172  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:54 AM
voltaire voltaire is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zebra View Post
2 years
So, judging by how the other rovers exceeded their life-expectancies, can this one similarly exceed expectations? Or is it that it's too big and heavy for solar-power alone once it's nuclear power plant goes kaput?
Reply With Quote
  #173  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:54 AM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Declan View Post
What was supposed to happen to the sky crane part, the animation says it was supposed to fly away from the rover, after it touched down. Did the rockets have enough juice to make orbit again, just to burn up.
I believe it's supposed to crash far enough away that it won't harm the rover.
Reply With Quote
  #174  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:55 AM
Declan Declan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
I guess we can add the skycrane part to googles martian street view

Declan
Reply With Quote
  #175  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:55 AM
Onomatopoeia Onomatopoeia is offline
私は女性の香りが大好きです
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 小浜国
Posts: 4,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmyk View Post
Mmmm... Look at all those MacBooks...
Yeah, the new Macbook Pro with the retina display.
Reply With Quote
  #176  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:55 AM
raventhief raventhief is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Woot! Go Curiosity!
Reply With Quote
  #177  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:55 AM
2gigch1 2gigch1 is offline
ReMember
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 1,286
Interesting - all the JPL laptops are Apples.

They just said all the NASA websites have crashed due to overload of requests

ETA Beat me to it

Last edited by 2gigch1; 08-06-2012 at 12:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #178  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:56 AM
cmyk cmyk is offline
4 out of 5 Jesuses agree!
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 10,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerc View Post
I believe it flies up and crashes down on the surface a short distance away, it does not go into orbit.
I thought it flies away, crashes to the surface a good distance from Curiosity, then with fixed, cold eyes... sits... and waits...

Last edited by cmyk; 08-06-2012 at 12:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #179  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:56 AM
GuanoLad GuanoLad is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 18,109
Isn't that amazing, the first pictures from a new Mars rover go through Facebook and Twitter first.
Reply With Quote
  #180  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:56 AM
Covered_In_Bees! Covered_In_Bees! is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/ustream.html

This one has been working just fine for me. Or does that not count as a NASA website somehow?

EDIT: This was in response to 2gigch1.

Last edited by Covered_In_Bees!; 08-06-2012 at 12:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #181  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:57 AM
Declan Declan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Is that peanut company paying any sponsorship money to the program

Declan
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:57 AM
cmyk cmyk is offline
4 out of 5 Jesuses agree!
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 10,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onomatopoeia View Post
Yeah, the new Macbook Pro with the retina display.
Want.
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:57 AM
TimeWinder TimeWinder is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 2,545
I presume NBC's doing their footage for them? Everything from Mars is on an irritating 14-minute tape delay!
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:58 AM
Snowboarder Bo Snowboarder Bo is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmyk View Post
Mmmm... Look at all those MacBooks...
Aye! Nice ad for Apple, isn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:58 AM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by voltaire View Post
So, judging by how the other rovers exceeded their life-expectancies, can this one similarly exceed expectations? Or is it that it's too big and heavy for solar-power alone once it's nuclear power plant goes kaput?
It's powered by Plutonium-238 which has a half-life of 88 years, so the power supply is not the limiting factor. Many NASA missions start out with a 2-year planned life, and get extended for many more years if it's functioning properly and producing useful data. Of course each extension requires additional operating budget to be approved.
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 08-06-2012, 12:58 AM
cmyk cmyk is offline
4 out of 5 Jesuses agree!
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 10,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Declan View Post
Is that peanut company paying any sponsorship money to the program

Declan
Yep. They're paid in peanuts.
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:00 AM
cmyk cmyk is offline
4 out of 5 Jesuses agree!
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 10,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowboarder Bo View Post
Aye! Nice ad for Apple, isn't it?
Hell yeh! Thank god the mission wasn't a faillure.

I wondered if they used Mission Control or LaunchPad?
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:01 AM
Onomatopoeia Onomatopoeia is offline
私は女性の香りが大好きです
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 小浜国
Posts: 4,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by scr4 View Post
It's powered by Plutonium-238 which has a half-life of 88 years, so the power supply is not the limiting factor.
what, the Macbooks?
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:01 AM
Declan Declan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Another question, how good are those cameras on the rover supposed to be, or are they just glorified webcams.

Any chance they are Canon or Nikon

Declan
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:01 AM
cmyk cmyk is offline
4 out of 5 Jesuses agree!
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 10,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeWinder View Post
I presume NBC's doing their footage for them? Everything from Mars is on an irritating 14-minute tape delay!
Even on Mars, the delay is only 14 mins; not 5 hours.
Reply With Quote
  #191  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:02 AM
2gigch1 2gigch1 is offline
ReMember
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 1,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Covered_In_Bees! View Post
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/ustream.html

This one has been working just fine for me. Or does that not count as a NASA website somehow?

EDIT: This was in response to 2gigch1.
That one crashed on me at about 10 mins before landing, it's back now. I had to scramble for an alternate source (UStream) to watch the landing.

I was just passing on the comment by the host on NASA JPL that the NASA regular site had crashed (but may be up now).
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:04 AM
GuanoLad GuanoLad is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Where the wild roses grow
Posts: 18,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by Declan View Post
Another question, how good are those cameras on the rover supposed to be, or are they just glorified webcams.
I believe they are HD quality, whatever that means for stills. But I do wonder if they're capable of video...
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:04 AM
Declan Declan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Nasa just switched the feed to another room at JPL, looks like the battlestar galactica bridge

Declan
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:05 AM
MEBuckner MEBuckner is offline
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 9,754
I think a shout-out is also in order for the 2001 Mars Odyssey, the Mars orbiter they're using to relay the data from Curiosity. It's a real trouper as well--been going strong in orbit around Mars for over 10 years now.
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:06 AM
Declan Declan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuanoLad View Post
I believe they are HD quality, whatever that means for stills. But I do wonder if they're capable of video...
Oh great, now we wont be able to shut up the cult of HDR photos

Declan
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:06 AM
Onomatopoeia Onomatopoeia is offline
私は女性の香りが大好きです
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 小浜国
Posts: 4,485
News briefing in 10 minutes.
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:07 AM
Declan Declan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
lol, mission is speechless

Declan
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:11 AM
Lancia Lancia is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Denial
Posts: 922
Does anyone know if there was video or even pics taken during decent? Seems to me they would have cameras pointing both up and down and activated during descent, seeing as how the Sky Crane was such a novel approach to landing.
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:12 AM
wolfman wolfman is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Sorry if this seems Dickish, especially during the Olympics, and I know there is a lot of ugly things going on in the world,
but I wasn't around for the moon landing, and this honestly makes my eyes well with pride for the U.S and my tax dollars


and shit...
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 08-06-2012, 01:12 AM
scr4 scr4 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuanoLad View Post
I believe they are HD quality, whatever that means for stills. But I do wonder if they're capable of video...
They are 1600x1200 and can operate up to 10 frames per second according to Wikipedia.

There's no chance such a major mission would use commercial cameras. I expect they are designed specifically for space applications - i.e. ruggedized, radiation-tolerant, vacuum compatible, all electronics conductively cooled, etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.