The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2012, 03:39 PM
whc.03grady whc.03grady is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Murder/Attempted Murder and Time

Let's say Jones shoots Smith in an attempt to kill him. Smith doesn't immediately die, but dies a week later from the wounds. Smith is then charged with murder.
Okay, that seems right.
Now say Jackson shoots Williams in an attempt to kill him. Williams doesn't immediately die, but dies ten years later as a result of the wounds sustained. Can Jackson now be charged with murder?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 01-11-2012, 03:44 PM
treis treis is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Yes, if the death can be shown to be a direct result of an attack. Here is a recent example.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2012, 03:50 PM
Ambrosio Spinola Ambrosio Spinola is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
At common law, the rule was that you couldn't be prosecuted for murder if the death occurred more than a year and a day after your act or omission occurred.
Wikipedia link
In the US there's currently a hodgepodge of rules about how long the period has to be. I guess in England now there isn't a time limit at all, although there are apparently hoops to jump through if it's been more than three years.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2012, 03:53 PM
griffin1977 griffin1977 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
In the UK until fairly recently (last decade or so) there was a law that explicitly set a limit of one year on such things (i.e. if someone took longer than a year to die you could not be prosecuted for murder). Sensibly given advances in medicine since Anglo Saxon days (where that particular law had its origins) the law was changed to remove such time limits.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2012, 03:56 PM
Zsofia Zsofia is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
One of the guys shot from the Texas clock tower by Charles Whitman died decades later and was still counted as a murder victim, yes.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2012, 04:02 PM
kunilou kunilou is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 15,816
In 2008, a gunamn shot up a City Council meetinging in my hometown. Six people died at the scene. Seven months later another person died as a result of the shooting, and that's now the official count (plus the shooter, who was killed by police.)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2012, 04:25 PM
Shagnasty Shagnasty is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 20,629
Here is a recent case in New York where a man was charged with murder 30 years later after the victim died.

http://www.democraticunderground.com...ss=104x5079229
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-13-2012, 12:58 PM
Dendarii Dame Dendarii Dame is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by whc.03grady View Post
Let's say Jones shoots Smith in an attempt to kill him. Smith doesn't immediately die, but dies a week later from the wounds. Smith is then charged with murder.
Okay, that seems right.
Smith is charged with murder? Talk about blaming the victim...

Last edited by Dendarii Dame; 01-13-2012 at 12:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.