My intentions in this thread are the following: To sew together every “Personal Belief Theory” that I have gathered since I was a small child, into the intricate web of thought it currently is, but able to be perceived as the tapestry of sound reasoning that it is. The fact is any “effect”, “acton”, “reaction”, or “observation” made in our current perception is subject to psychological programming or conceptual bias. Meaning there is no guarantee of any cosmic effect, ie. Perception of color, time, thought, speech or any other common physical, mental, or spiritual constant.For instance, when looking at an apple, we know its red, but only because we were taught, “the apple is red” though i may see it as say, brown or purple, or maybe it is in fact a granny smith apple and I perceive it to be pink. You see it as deep blue, but alas it is a red delicious and a green granny smith because our brains are repetitively told, that is red, this is green. It doesn’t matter what color we see, we associate them the same way, despite any knowing of the light spectrum, no one could ever deny the light spectrum as a common reference to this argument, because we still associate the same colors even on the given light spectrum. The same can be said for consciousness, whose to say you are awake right now or not, perhaps the reason why we sleep at all is to live our real lives and this is the dream. We cannot bridge this gap to find out whether this is true or not. Like the perception of light, I believe we are in a constant state of flux between the conscious and unconscious states. For instance I believe I am in my bed right now, being retold the events of this message in chronological order as a dream, think of it as auto pilot, I was going to post this message anyway based on what I know, my experiences, call it cause and effect.Consciousness had no real place in this happening. I may only be observing my actions as an audience not necessarily the observer, call it fate or eventual happenstance. When tested this theology checks out. Deja vu, life flashing before our eyes before death, the lack of memory before the age of 5 or so, perhaps that is why small children never want to sleep, they would rather continue the constant input and who knows, they might lack the linguistic facilities, to say “I have active control over what I am doing right now”, while the parent is steeped in repetition and habit. There will be two more parts to this current discipline of theory coming soon. Please add comments, share similar thoughts and any positive feedback, criticism, or question will be addresses and responses to under the current set of theories.
Okay.
Paragraphs might aid in the perception of this sound reasoning.
My nokia n8 doesn’t allow for line breaks for some reason, i’m on my n95 now. I’ll fix it shortly on a pc, also that was supposed to end as addressed and responded to… Again some bad cell phone editing sorry, remember, this is like a tip of a microscopic airborn ice particle in a cave on the tip of a rather large iceberg, give me a bit of time to spread the base coat.
maybe it would work
Manually… Aha n95 is better than n8, weird… Sorry but if i’m going to post these in succession i will have to be doing it on the move.
Line break test
Perhaps what you perceive as a Nokia N95 is the same as what I perceive as a Nokia N8, or a teaspoon.
Or in short, it sounds like you’re saying there is no objective reality. I refute it thus! (ouch!)
Mister Anderson-welcome back.
Even if we perceive colors differently (and this goes into the gnarly philosophical area of “qualia,” which you will find pretty damn controversial around here,) we can perform simple experiments.
I ask you, “Point to the red automobile.” You do so. In a titanically overwhelming number of instances, you and I are observing the same car. We may experience the color differently internally, but as far as external objects, we are on the same page.
This works well enough for humanity to have built an information-age civilization. If we all perceived things so very differently as to make communication impossible, then that couldn’t have happened.
Our minds and perceptions are similar. I’ll never see that car exactly the same way you do…but I trust you to drive it on a crowded freeway. I will literally stake my life on it.
Between 2am and 4am watch the sky between 90° of the big dipper handle out 2/3 of the sky meeting with the same 30° declination of cassiopeia 2/3 of the sky, that is your window, wait at least 1hr for your eyes to adjust, it is nifty to have screen brightener/flashlight app for communication, you may eventually see blinking objects but seemingly intelligent in action, test this theory, dare you to try, could just change things, word yo the wise Don’t be surprise if they take a few pictures, every once in a while they flash very brightly as if taking a picture, if you choose that moment to use your source of light to respond, that would be the best time. Also sometimes use your peripheral vision to pick out moving faint objects, the ones i’m talking about always seem to be mere satillites, but trust me the right ones aren’t, over 30 in less than one hour recently, Happy sightings
All tools…that will be covered in “universal spectral compression” like think of our perception, 5 senses, as an mp3 waveform is a compression of full fidelity audio, our perception has few and many restraints
(my bold)
Ok, I’m with you on everything until right here; here you’ve lost me. 
What are these “right ones” of which you speak? If they aren’t satellites, what are they? Aliens?
If the idea that perceived colors might be arbitraily different from person to person, then the objective, intrinsic properties of luminance as it pertains to wavelength would disagree if we arbitraily shifted the spectrum, and mixed swatches of what you and I might call “yellow” and “cyan.”
I believe this to be a fallacy from the start.
I’ve attempted to demonstrate this by creating this illustration/diagram.
Interesting. You argue in favor of an epistemology in which validating truth claims is impossible. And you then follow up with a post about UFOs.
Usually those two events occur in the opposite order.
The only logical conclusion is that you’re a time traveler who’s traveling backwards through time.
Dooood.
Careful there with the assumption jumping. You may fall of the edge of the earth.
I don’t know if they are aliens but I do know according to current admitted “human capability”, the same movement is not possible with current technology, admittedly…
that wasn’t what I was referring to, these are not simple solar particles refracting around the rods and cones trust me on that, have patience don’t judge until you try
Care to describe this particular movement?
Also, I wouldn’t be so sure on what you do and do not know about man-made stuff and what they can or cannot do. There are also visual phenomena that are perceived anywhere and everywhere within our optical perception system (e.g. Vitreous fluid; retina; optic nerves, occipital lobes in the brain; migraine prisms; etc.) that doesn’t need to resort to UFOs and aliens being the only explanation.
Do Nokia phones have any apps for keeping track of your meds?
Until I try what? Sitting outside in the middle of the night, staring at the northern constellations, until I see blinky moving things that I should summon with my flashing iPhone app, until I take a picture of them taking a picture of me?
ETA: BWAH?! :dubious: