|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My Rotary-Dial Phone Is Working!
I needed to get landline anyway, for my Aler1® emergency button (I've fallen and I can't get up!). So I asked AT&T if they still accomodated rotary phones. "sure, we'll put in 2 phone-jacks".
I haven't had a landline since 1999, and I haven't had to "dial" a phone since I was a little kid. I found a heavy, black bakelite, antique office-phone at a swap-meet in 2004. It cost me $3 and still had the old 4-prong wall plug. I got an adaptor and plugged it in, viola! "One ringy-dingy..."
|
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
My son has a phone like that in his house. It actually has better sound quality than the cell phone.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't most land lines?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
sure the dial still works. and the bell will get your attention, no wimpy sound.
i'm still waiting for that dial picture phone. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not necessarily. They problem is stuffing it your pocket when you want to go to anther part of the house.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's not surprising. POTS (Plain Old Telephone System) connections, which all (at least in the USA) are, works just fine with technology that has roots in the 1870s. That's 1870s for you younguns. It's a marvelous example of compatibility.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
My rotary cellphone works fine! http://wp7applist.com/app/30113/rotary-dialer-free
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dunno, I'm surprised it works. I thought we had to replace all our rotary and pulse phones when we ordered touch tone service in the 80's. Maybe it was just a clever pitch to sell touch tone phones?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
What made you think that? Even modern electronic phones have a pulse mode (or at least the last one I bought does). Touch Tone was always an option, not a requirement. You can even "dial" today by breaking the connection in a regular manner with the on-hook switch. Did you know that?
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aren't they great? I have two (working) rotary phones, bought ages ago from a company in the Midwest that saves and resells old phones.
In my office, a 1919 brass candlestick phone: http://p2.la-img.com/1225/28916/11134563_1_m.jpg And in my bedroom, a French-style 1930s phone: http://zapprops.com/home/wp-content/...ht30sphone.jpg |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a rotary wall phone in the kitchen. Also a cordless phone with two charger stations.
The only problem I have is the appointment reminder calls from my dentist and doctor. They want you to press 1 to acknowledge the appointment. if I happpen to answer in the kitchen, then That's when I have to run to the living room and use the cordless phone to press the 1. That only happens a few times a year. Last edited by aceplace57; 06-17-2012 at 04:57 PM. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
When you actually ordered a touch-tone connections, it cost MORE per month than a pulse-only connection. (This was true at least as late as 1971 or 1972, when I got my very own phone account for the first time.) So I order a pulse-only connection. I asked the customer rep on the phone the obvious question: If you're so pushing to move everybody to touch-tone, why do you charge more for it? Customer Service rep: (mumble) Note, in those days, you didn't get any useful value (that I knew of anyway) out of having touch-tone. This was long before you could do any sort of data-by-telephone activities, like phone banking or bill-paying or trekking your way through Og-awful phone menus, etc. Although certainly, the phone companies knew and intended that this would be the future of telecommunications. ETA: Modern-day automated phone answering machines with those voice menus are high on my list of inventions the world didn't need. Last edited by Senegoid; 06-17-2012 at 05:37 PM. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Heck, I paid a couple of dollars more per month for Touch-tone in 1960 just because I liked the way I could dial fast (and I was a geek). And that was when long distance numbers were rarely used. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brian, I must get your number so I can give you a call one of these evenings.
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() takes me 5 - 10 rings to answer it, and it's always been a stupid robo-call. I ignore it now. Unless we work out a precise time. Last edited by BMalion; 06-17-2012 at 07:24 PM. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK I'll post you a letter telling you what time I'll be calling at. Or I could just semaphore you.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
somehow, this makes you seem older than either the need for an alert system or the desire for an old phone :P
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() I guess I'm part-Amish, in that I love old technology. Last edited by BMalion; 06-17-2012 at 07:43 PM. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aye, I've seen your claymore. And I'm not talking mines here folks.
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
cellphone. Last edited by Sunspace; 06-17-2012 at 10:28 PM. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
I always wanted a Princess phone (in pink of course). Damn it, I miss the old-fashioned telephone ringer sound!
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
A while back, I found an all-original WE 1500 -- a ten-button touch tone phone from 1967 -- in a thrift store. Paid two bucks for it, and sold it on eBay for $130 after a good cleaning and polishing, and documenting dates of all parts to certify it's not a "frankenphone". At home, though, I've only got one of the old phones plugged in; a rotary Trimline in my bedroom. Rotary phones work perfectly on Time-Warner's phone service. Last edited by elmwood; 06-18-2012 at 09:03 AM. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
These days a little girl-scout could kick my ass. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I also like the old real rotaries, but hit a snag when we upgraded the house to VOIP service. Sadly, the VOIP system does not understand rotary dialing, so I pulled more aging tech out of my bag of tricks and the house now has a Merlin Legend PBX that does understand rotary and can translate it to DTMF. Eventually, I plan to hook up my wood wall phone to the Merlin. ![]() ETA: I've got a claymore as well.
Last edited by gotpasswords; 06-18-2012 at 10:51 AM. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
*shuck* tiktiktiktiktiktiktik
*shuck* tiktiktiktiktik *shuck* tiktiktiktiktiktiktiktiktiktik *shuck* tiktik *shuck* tiktiktiktiktik *shuck* tiktiktiktik "awww man!" *click* ![]() Ahh, memories. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The current TPC landline switching equipment still has to be compatible with the olde phones. |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
You might be able to find on the net one of those '70s or '80s round, battery-powered hand-held phone-tone generators made to use with pulse-tone phones. They had all the buttons, and the user would hold it next to the pulse-phone transmitter.
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That the ringer will wake me out of a dead sleep is a bonus. |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Sending 1209Hz and 697Hz indicates that the "1" digit is being sent. Envío de 1336Hz y 697 Hz indica que se está enviando el dígito "2". http://nemesis.lonestar.org/referenc...ling/dtmf.html |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Our local phone company discontinued support for pulse dialing a couple months back. Made me sad, though it has no impact on my life. I expect someone makes an interface box of some sort if I really want to hook up an old-timey telephone. I'm more likely to cut my land line entirely, since the only use it ever gets these days is when my mother calls, and it's not like she doesn't have my cell number.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|