The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Great Debates

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 06-19-2012, 07:39 PM
Meatros Meatros is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Not All That Bright View Post
That's what I said: Anselm. I mean thanks.
It reminded me of anselm and Descartes a bit.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #52  
Old 06-19-2012, 07:41 PM
Meatros Meatros is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Invictus View Post
It is necessary for a mind-object to be well defined before it can be considered real.

That does not mean that all well-defined mind objects ARE real.

Please don't twist my words.
So then what does make that distinction?
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 06-19-2012, 08:00 PM
RedFury RedFury is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hell's Den
Posts: 6,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meatros View Post
So then what does make that distinction?
When you define "God" as he does. Duh!

NB-which he is yet to do. And won't be able to outside of ethereal mumbo-jumbo, abusing word definitions to suit their purpose & 'personal experience'.

I'm excited though, this is like nothing we've ever read before on here.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 06-19-2012, 08:08 PM
Voyager Voyager is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deep Space
Posts: 30,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Invictus View Post
Thats the problem - already you are defining God in an inconsistent way by attributing omniscience and omnipotence. Straw man?
I was referring to your use of "necessary." It was just an example of a self-contradictory definition of god. But I clearly did not limit definitions of god to this one. Assuming we don't go to silly extremes - Augustus was called a God by the Romans, Augustus existed, thus God exists - give me a definition and I'll refute it.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 06-19-2012, 08:18 PM
Voyager Voyager is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deep Space
Posts: 30,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggie the Ocelot View Post
But that's the thing. I think a lot of times when people say "God", they aren't thinking necessarily of a specific god at all. They're thinking of some sort of benificent Creator-spirit, who may or may not have any defining characteristics beyond that.

If you're arguing for a Deist sort of god, you are NOT arguing for a god that fits the defined characteristics of either YHVH or Jesus. If you are arguing that God is Nature, or Eternity, or the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal - that's cool, and worth discussing - but again, that's not the same Deity described in the Torah or the New Testament.
Even the deity defined in the New Testament doesn't seem to be well defined, with different sects saying he loves gays or hates gays. This, and your first point, is exactly what I was referring to. A believer can't expect an atheist to demonstrate why the god he believes in makes no sense when he can't even describe the god he believes in.

It is like if a doctor is asked to create a cure for Bonkus of the Conkus, which is a disease which sometimes makes you feel tired on Monday or glad on Tuesday, and can be found in a leg, an arm, or nowhere at all. She can't come up with a cure? What kind of doctor is she, anyhow?
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 07-22-2012, 08:15 AM
Bamboo Boy Bamboo Boy is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Invictus View Post
It is necessary for a mind-object to be well defined before it can be considered real.

That does not mean that all well-defined mind objects ARE real.

Please don't twist my words.
I think this gave him that idea:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Invictus View Post
I am of the opinion that if something is well defined it is true, and that the cardinal attribute of a real object is truth (ie correspondence to reality).


and this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Invictus View Post
Example - suppose I define God as reality.

God is real because reality is real.

Its very simple.

I know I'm late to the party, but I didn't see anyone here point this out explicitly. Are you for real, Invictus?
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 07-22-2012, 02:35 PM
jayjay jayjay is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggie the Ocelot View Post
*shrug* God is a category, a job title, not necessarily a first name.
Yeah, his first name is Yahu-Wahu. According to some sources, anyway...
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 07-22-2012, 02:49 PM
Morgenstern Morgenstern is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Really Not All That Bright View Post
Don Quixote is pretty well defined; there are 500,000 words in the novel about him, give or take. He's still fictional.
According to Peoplesmart, he's 27 and lives in Portland Oregon.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 07-22-2012, 05:09 PM
MrDibble MrDibble is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa &
Posts: 12,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hamster King View Post
For example, I happen to know that there's a real animal called a quagga, but I have no idea what one looks like, or where they live, or what their habits are.
I hate to break it to you, but quaggas don't exist.





Anymore.

Kind of like God.

And that OP is the poorest restatement of the Ontological Proof I've ever read.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 07-22-2012, 06:49 PM
jayjay jayjay is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morgenstern View Post
According to Peoplesmart, he's 27 and lives in Portland Oregon.
Wait...I thought Donkey Hodey lived in Someplace Else?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.