The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > General Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-23-2012, 02:02 PM
HeyHomie HeyHomie is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield, IL
Posts: 8,240
The Sharpest Razor

This is a thought experiment.

Imagine that science has figured out how to make the ultimate slicing tool, for use in... whatever the hell they'd need it. For simplicity, let's say it's made of tungsten.

If you held the blade vertically, sharp end up, it would be shaped like two-dimensional pyramid. The tip of the blade is one atom thick. Two atoms below the tip, three atoms below that, etc.

Three questions:

1: How many atoms thick would it have to be before I could see anything? I'm guessing it would be in the quadrillions of atoms.

2. Looking at the blade with the naked eye, would I be able to see a definitive edge to the blade, like I can with a run-of-the-mill Gillette blade? Or would it look... I dunno, fuzzy?

3. What would happen if I put my finger to it? I imagine that it would slice so cleanly and painlessly that I wouldn't notice anything amiss until my finger was severed.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 08-23-2012, 02:12 PM
Keeve Keeve is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
I've actually wondered about this myself. Here's the tricky part:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyHomie View Post
The tip of the blade is one atom thick. Two atoms below the tip, three atoms below that, etc.
Unless I'm mistaken, the two sides end up being at right angles to each other. Perhaps this "blade" would not really be particularly sharp at all, on account of the sides being at such a wide angle. Or, perhaps, because the sides are so smooth, and go all the way to being just one atom across, it would indeed be incredibly sharp. Which?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-23-2012, 02:25 PM
HoneyBadgerDC HoneyBadgerDC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Torrance Ca
Posts: 3,236
Think of it this way, how many atoms could you fit into a square inch. If you put 1# pressure on the blade you would have billions of PSI at the tip. I have heard that some Dr's are now using Obsidian flakes for scalpels now.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-23-2012, 02:31 PM
Machine Elf Machine Elf is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keeve View Post
I've actually wondered about this myself. Here's the tricky part:Unless I'm mistaken, the two sides end up being at right angles to each other.
This will depend on the crystalline structure of the material involved. If the material uses a close-pack structure, the angle between the two faces of the blade would be about 55 degrees.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2012, 02:31 PM
al27052 al27052 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by badger5149 View Post
Think of it this way, how many atoms could you fit into a square inch. If you put 1# pressure on the blade you would have billions of PSI at the tip. I have heard that some Dr's are now using Obsidian flakes for scalpels now.
Plastic surgeons who work on facial features sometimes use obsidian-bladed scalpels. They supposedly cause less scarring, because they are so sharp. The blades are only useful for soft tissue, though, because they break very easily.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-23-2012, 02:32 PM
typoink typoink is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyHomie View Post
This is a thought experiment.

Imagine that science has figured out how to make the ultimate slicing tool, for use in... whatever the hell they'd need it. For simplicity, let's say it's made of tungsten.

If you held the blade vertically, sharp end up, it would be shaped like two-dimensional pyramid. The tip of the blade is one atom thick. Two atoms below the tip, three atoms below that, etc.

Three questions:

1: How many atoms thick would it have to be before I could see anything? I'm guessing it would be in the quadrillions of atoms.

2. Looking at the blade with the naked eye, would I be able to see a definitive edge to the blade, like I can with a run-of-the-mill Gillette blade? Or would it look... I dunno, fuzzy?

3. What would happen if I put my finger to it? I imagine that it would slice so cleanly and painlessly that I wouldn't notice anything amiss until my finger was severed.
#1 and #2 are probably hard to answer, since the "atomically sharp" area of the blade would be microscopic. So it's basically moot; the part of the blade you'd see would probably look like a normal razor blade. Existing razor blades are already too sharp to see the "sharpness" with a naked eye.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2012, 02:32 PM
Enderw24 Enderw24 is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: KC. MO -094 35.3 39 4.9
Posts: 10,212
An atom is 1 is, on average, 1 angstrom long. Or close enough that we'll go with that. An angstrom is 10^-10 meters in length.
How small can you see? Let's call it 1/2 the diameter of a human hair which is 45 microns or 4.5*10^-5

OK, so just divide one into the other and you come up with 22,222. That's how many atoms across you could just barely see at the limits of your eyesight.

I think.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-23-2012, 02:46 PM
Michael63129 Michael63129 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyHomie View Post
1: How many atoms thick would it have to be before I could see anything? I'm guessing it would be in the quadrillions of atoms.

2. Looking at the blade with the naked eye, would I be able to see a definitive edge to the blade, like I can with a run-of-the-mill Gillette blade? Or would it look... I dunno, fuzzy?

3. What would happen if I put my finger to it? I imagine that it would slice so cleanly and painlessly that I wouldn't notice anything amiss until my finger was severed.
1. It's actually a lot less than you think; the bond distance between tungsten atoms is 274 picometers and the smallest thing your eye can see is about 50 micrometers, which is only about 182,000 atoms. There's also some minimum thickness before the material becomes opaque (very thin metal is transparent), probably a lot thinner than this.

2. You'd probably still see a sharp line since the blade goes from transparent to opaque over a very small distance, especially since the angle is so wide (90 degrees as previously stated)*.

3. Only the very tip would be super-sharp; a blade big enough to see with the progression in thickness you stated would basically have the cross-section of a cube*, so you'd have a very wide base going through your flesh. In fact. I doubt it would really cut that well, much less be able to sever your finger, unless you used a much thinner blade (it'd still be painful though, simply because you are injured, if less painful that if a saw or ordinary knife was used). Of course, such a thin tip would likely dull down very rapidly.

*Unless you meant that the tip started out with one atom, then two, then three, then stopped getting wider after some point.

Last edited by Michael63129; 08-23-2012 at 02:46 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-23-2012, 02:46 PM
bup bup is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Several sources on the web say obsidian blades can be of 'molecular thickness' on the edge.

Here's one.

I don't know how much faith to put in it.

Anyway, part of your question was what would happen if you touched it. Supposedly blades that sharp can separate cells (including dead skin cells?), rather than crushing any of them.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-23-2012, 03:44 PM
TriPolar TriPolar is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by bup View Post
Several sources on the web say obsidian blades can be of 'molecular thickness' on the edge.

Here's one.

I don't know how much faith to put in it.

Anyway, part of your question was what would happen if you touched it. Supposedly blades that sharp can separate cells (including dead skin cells?), rather than crushing any of them.
Holding a knife by hand would bend or break off a lot of really thin stuff. I don't even know what kind of machine could apply force properly to avoid that. But that's what happens with a regular knife, little bits get deformed and come off on whatever you cut. So the molecule thin blade would rapidly decline to the point of something no sharper than the best conventionally sharpened blades now. Well after the first cut anyway.

Last edited by TriPolar; 08-23-2012 at 03:44 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-23-2012, 06:26 PM
the_diego the_diego is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Not definitive but most craftsmen and machinists can touch or see 1/1000 of an inch or roughly 30 microns (0.03 mm) i personally attained this dimension when i was grinding mineral thin sections for a petrographic laboratory. We measured the cutting edge of various "sharp" blades and they are less than 0.5 microns (0.0005 mm) right at the tip. Needless to say, you can't see it.

With regard to knives, you come to bevel angles right at the cutting edge. axes, machetes and big knives have a cutting bevel of 25 to 40 degrees on one side. Most pocket knives today can be sharpened down from 20 to even 9 degrees per side. A well-sharpened pocket knife can split a single strand of hair.

The sharpest "ground" edge i know are diamond scalpels. A single scallop of glass flaked from a bigger chunk might even be sharper. I'm not sure. What I'm sure of is it's definitely easier to flake glass or obsidian than to grind down diamond.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.