The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Cafe Society

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 08-31-2012, 08:06 AM
Bakhesh Bakhesh is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2003
Pink Floyd - "We don't need no education"

It's "We don't need ANY education", and clearly, you do

Last edited by Bakhesh; 08-31-2012 at 08:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #152  
Old 08-31-2012, 08:11 AM
DrDeth DrDeth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 20,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakhesh View Post
Pink Floyd - "We don't need no education"

It's "We don't need ANY education", and clearly, you do
The whole "double negative = a positive" is not actually part of English grammar. No one, after hearing that line, misunderstands what is being said.
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 08-31-2012, 08:25 AM
Ponch8 Ponch8 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,807
In Eminem's "Stan," he alludes to the story of Phil Collins' "In the Air Tonight."

You know this song by Phil Collins
"In the Air Tonight'
About that guy who could have saved
That other guy from drowning?
But didn't, and Phil saw it all
Then at his show he found him?

It's a well-known story, but it isn't true.
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 08-31-2012, 09:57 AM
Small Hen Small Hen is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponch8 View Post
In Eminem's "Stan," he alludes to the story of Phil Collins' "In the Air Tonight."

You know this song by Phil Collins
"In the Air Tonight'
About that guy who could have saved
That other guy from drowning?
But didn't, and Phil saw it all
Then at his show he found him?

It's a well-known story, but it isn't true.
It doesn't matter if it's true, it only matters if Stan thinks it's true.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 08-31-2012, 11:25 AM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeF View Post
Snoopy vs the Red Baron - The Royal Guardsmen - Snoopy didn't shoot down the Red Baron. He wasn't even there.
I'd be careful about making such wild claims. You could set sued by a World Famous Attorney.

Last edited by Siam Sam; 08-31-2012 at 11:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 08-31-2012, 01:39 PM
Voyager Voyager is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Deep Space
Posts: 30,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeF View Post

Snoopy vs the Red Baron - The Royal Guardsmen - Snoopy didn't shoot down the Red Baron. He wasn't even there.
Where in that song did you hear that Snoopy shot down the Red Baron. IIRC the verse goes

"but the Baron shot him down
Curses foiled again. "

Anyhow you forgot to mention that doghouses don't fly.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 08-31-2012, 01:42 PM
bup bup is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Final verse:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal Guardsmen
That Bloody Red Baron was in a fix
He'd tried everything, but he'd run out of tricks
Snoopy fired once, and he fired twice
And that Bloody Red Baron went spinning out of sight
Also, dogs can't talk.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 08-31-2012, 01:54 PM
tim-n-va tim-n-va is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronX View Post
But they say wall, not walls
I thought it was "we built a wall" I'm sure there was at least one wall before a pyramid.
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 08-31-2012, 10:44 PM
Alley Dweller Alley Dweller is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
The whole "double negative = a positive" is not actually part of English grammar. No one, after hearing that line, misunderstands what is being said.
So, if a double negative is not a positive then the sentence "No one, after hearing that line, misunderstands what is being said" means the same as "No one, after hearing that line, understands what is being said"? We can just disregard the second and subsequent negatives in a sentence without changing its meaning?
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 09-01-2012, 02:34 AM
Martian Bigfoot Martian Bigfoot is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alley Dweller View Post
So, if a double negative is not a positive then the sentence "No one, after hearing that line, misunderstands what is being said" means the same as "No one, after hearing that line, understands what is being said"? We can just disregard the second and subsequent negatives in a sentence without changing its meaning?
Obviously, not every instance of multiple negatives in the same sentence intensify the negation. It only works in certain cases, in sentences that are constructed in very specific ways, and it does so very consistently. Which is to say that double negation (negative concord) follows rules, i.e., it's part of English grammar. Portugese, Spanish and French all have it too. German doesn't and Latin didn't, but Old English and Middle English both did, and the notion that modern English doesn't and using it is wrong, dammit, is a purely imaginary one.

(Edit: Think about it: Isn't it strange that a usage that is supposed to be "wrong" seems to show up repeatedly in just about every bleedin' so-called non-standard dialect of English as soon as you step away from the "standard", as well as in lots of people's everyday speech as soon as the Language Police isn't looking?)

Last edited by Martian Bigfoot; 09-01-2012 at 02:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #161  
Old 09-01-2012, 09:54 AM
Lamia Lamia is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian Bigfoot View Post
Obviously, not every instance of multiple negatives in the same sentence intensify the negation. It only works in certain cases, in sentences that are constructed in very specific ways, and it does so very consistently. Which is to say that double negation (negative concord) follows rules, i.e., it's part of English grammar. Portugese, Spanish and French all have it too. German doesn't and Latin didn't, but Old English and Middle English both did, and the notion that modern English doesn't and using it is wrong, dammit, is a purely imaginary one.

(Edit: Think about it: Isn't it strange that a usage that is supposed to be "wrong" seems to show up repeatedly in just about every bleedin' so-called non-standard dialect of English as soon as you step away from the "standard", as well as in lots of people's everyday speech as soon as the Language Police isn't looking?)
While I agree with the above, it is also true that using a double negative as an intensifier is going to sound uneducated to a lot of people, and that saying things like "We don't need no education" may cause them to think that one does in fact need more education. Schools are generally expected to teach children how to write/speak a standard dialect.

However, I think this choice of phrasing was a deliberate rejection of "proper" English on Roger Waters' part. The point of "Another Brick in the Wall Part II" isn't that the kids "don't need no education" because they already know everything, but rather that the education system is unnecessarily controlling and brutal. While "don't need no" may not be standard English, that doesn't mean it's appropriate for a teacher to beat or mock a student for using double negatives or that it's wrong to use double negatives in informal speech/writing. So I'm coming down on the side of "We don't need no education" being somewhat ironic but not factually inaccurate.
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 09-02-2012, 12:24 AM
Slow Moving Vehicle Slow Moving Vehicle is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smapti View Post
Detroit is located on the north side of the strait that connects Lake Erie to Lake Superior and forms the border between the US and Canada. If you go south from downtown Detroit, you'll end up in Windsor, Ontario.
Thus the classic bar-bet question "If you're standing in downtown Detroit, and start walking due south, what's the first foreign country you reach? Of course, I'd bet that you're more likely to reach the undiscovered country, first.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lost4life View Post
Steve Perry finally weighs in on this troublesome topic.

Steve Perry
I ran the phonetics of east, west, and north, but nothing sounded as good or emotionally true to me as South Detroit, he says. The syntax just sounded right. I fell in love with the line. It’s only been in the last few years that I’ve learned that there is no South Detroit. But it doesn’t matter.
And he's absolutely correct.
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 09-03-2012, 03:29 AM
DrDeth DrDeth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 20,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ximenean View Post
You're making me labour this point more than I wanted -- I am not suggesting that Jack White needs to rewrite the lyrics of Seven Nation Army or anything -- but the crowns of England and Scotland were merged in the Act of Union in 1707. Since then there have been kings and queens of the United Kingdom, but not of England or Scotland per se. There is no political entity "England" for her to be queen of. No English government, no England-only jurisdiction.

I don't want to give the impression that this is something British people actually get upset about. It's just a little factual nitpick. This thread is full of them.
England is a nation that makes up per of the UK, thus England still exists, and ERII is Queen of that area, and in fact the entire island. Like I said, she's also Queen of London. Or Shropshire.

True, she does not style herself Queen of Shropshire since that is included in England which is included in the UK.
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 09-17-2012, 01:30 PM
Trans Fat Og Trans Fat Og is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Just west of West Webster
Posts: 1,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyager View Post
...Anyhow you forgot to mention that doghouses don't fly.
I beg to differ. You certainly can fly a doghouse... after you've quaffed enough root beers!

Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 09-17-2012, 03:53 PM
Typo Negative Typo Negative is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddha_david View Post
Tom Petty:
It's a long day, living in Reseda
There's a freeway runnin' through the yard


There is no freeway in Reseda.
To be fair, the 405 Freeway runs along the eastern border of Reseda

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=zent&o...en&sa=N&tab=wl
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 09-17-2012, 06:18 PM
hermann hermann is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
No East Side in Chicago? Funny, my sister's address is something something East Chestnut.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 09-17-2012, 08:27 PM
j666 j666 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2002
I have to join in the quibbles.

The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald is a ballad; ballads are never inaccurate. They are romantic legends.

In The Night the Lights Went out in Georgia, just because the guy fired his gun to flag down the Staties doesn't mean they would be the first ones to show up. Nothing else went right for the poor guy that night.

(I have always wondered why a recently married man would have stopped for a beer after being gone for two weeks; if I'd been his 'young bride', I would have been checking out Seth Ames, too.)
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 09-17-2012, 08:43 PM
BigT BigT is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian Bigfoot View Post
(Edit: Think about it: Isn't it strange that a usage that is supposed to be "wrong" seems to show up repeatedly in just about every bleedin' so-called non-standard dialect of English as soon as you step away from the "standard", as well as in lots of people's everyday speech as soon as the Language Police isn't looking?)
No, because the entire concept of "proper grammar" is that is that it's how you speak in formal English. The fact that people often do it differently in another style has jack all to do with it. This isn't one of those constructions that was accepted in formal English until someone made up a rule that it shouldn't. It's always been considered wrong because it's confusing, and formal English is, among other things, about removing ambiguities like that.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 09-17-2012, 08:58 PM
terentii terentii is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
In the Monty Python "Universe/Galaxy Song," it says our planet is revolving at 900 mph. The Earth rotates on its axis at roughly 900 mph (more like 1,000 mph); it revolves around the Sun at 66,000 mph.
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 09-17-2012, 09:15 PM
california jobcase california jobcase is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
The song Lowlife by Theory Of a Dead Man has the line "I've got an '82 Fiero with a car seat in the middle broken down on the interstate". Not possible- Fieros were built '84-'88.

In Ridin' the Storm Out by REO Speedwagon, how can the singer see the full moon crossing the range when he's riding out a storm?
Reply With Quote
  #171  
Old 09-18-2012, 01:36 PM
Irishman Irishman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
He says he's waiting for the thaw out, so it seems that the snow has fallen and now they're snowed in, riding out the storm's effects. On a full moon night, watching the moon go by, because they are snowed in.
Reply With Quote
  #172  
Old 09-18-2012, 06:55 PM
Boulter's Canary Boulter's Canary is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
A somewhat geeky one:

1952 Vincent Black Lightning: "He reached for her hand and slipped her the keys."

The Vincent Black Lightning didn't have keys. It kick started.
Reply With Quote
  #173  
Old 09-19-2012, 01:30 AM
JKellyMap JKellyMap is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kansas, Mexico, New York
Posts: 3,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by hermann View Post
No East Side in Chicago? Funny, my sister's address is something something East Chestnut.
Addresses east of State Street are named thus. Doesn't mean there's any neighborhood or other entity known as "East Side".

Last edited by JKellyMap; 09-19-2012 at 01:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #174  
Old 09-19-2012, 01:33 AM
JKellyMap JKellyMap is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kansas, Mexico, New York
Posts: 3,224
Has anyone yet mentioned how Stephen Foster changed "Suwanee River" to "Swanee River" because it fit the song's meter?
Reply With Quote
  #175  
Old 09-19-2012, 01:50 AM
Boyo Jim Boyo Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 28,631
There's East Chicago (Indiana).
Reply With Quote
  #176  
Old 09-19-2012, 02:45 AM
Krokodil Krokodil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Daegu, S. Korea
Posts: 7,343
Starship did not, in fact, build that city on Rock and Roll. It was built on gold mining a good 130+ years earlier.
Reply With Quote
  #177  
Old 09-19-2012, 02:53 AM
Krokodil Krokodil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Daegu, S. Korea
Posts: 7,343
Actually, San Francisco was founded in 1776 by Spanish colonists maintaining a fort and a mission, but it only had around a thousand people in it until the Gold Rush; that's when it really took off. Starship/Jefferson Airplane got into the game pretty late, IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #178  
Old 09-19-2012, 06:16 AM
kayaker kayaker is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKellyMap View Post
Has anyone yet mentioned how Stephen Foster changed "Suwanee River" to "Swanee River" because it fit the song's meter?
The first time I saw the river in person, I thought he sign was misspelled!
Reply With Quote
  #179  
Old 09-19-2012, 08:35 PM
sahirrnee sahirrnee is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Emotional Rescue Rolling Stones

"I will be your knight in shining armour
Riding across the desert on a fine Arab charger"

I doubt an Arabian horse could carry a knight in armor, and if it could it wouldn't be charging. I don't know how long someone would last wearing armor in the desert before they dropped over from heatstroke.
Reply With Quote
  #180  
Old 09-19-2012, 09:21 PM
Biffy the Elephant Shrew Biffy the Elephant Shrew is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Over on the left
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by sahirrnee View Post
I don't know how long someone would last wearing armor in the desert before they dropped over from heatstroke.
Only if the sun is out. Jagger clearly points out that he's going to come to you so silent in the night.
Reply With Quote
  #181  
Old 09-19-2012, 10:32 PM
Seanette Seanette is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biffy the Elephant Shrew View Post
Only if the sun is out. Jagger clearly points out that he's going to come to you so silent in the night.
Silent, in armor?
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 09-20-2012, 08:39 AM
Biffy the Elephant Shrew Biffy the Elephant Shrew is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Over on the left
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seanette View Post
Silent, in armor?
From the sound of it, Mick was pretty well oiled while singing that.
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 09-20-2012, 08:52 AM
Cumbrian Cumbrian is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
In Prove It All Night, Bruce Springsteen claims that "we'll drive that dusty road from Monroe to Angeline". I read on another forum I frequent that, whilst there are a number of places called Monroe, there aren't any called Angeline. It's not like he's driving to a woman called Angeline either - in the next line he explains he's in the car with his girl to buy her a gold ring and a blue dress.
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 09-20-2012, 09:40 AM
Biffy the Elephant Shrew Biffy the Elephant Shrew is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Over on the left
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cumbrian View Post
I read on another forum I frequent that, whilst there are a number of places called Monroe, there aren't any called Angeline.
Texas has both a Monroe and an Angelina. "Angeline" could be taken as a poetic contraction, along the lines of songs that refer to states called "Caroline" or "Alabam."
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 09-20-2012, 10:04 PM
Siam Sam Siam Sam is offline
Elephant Whisperer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 20,677
Oops! nm.

Last edited by Siam Sam; 09-20-2012 at 10:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 09-20-2012, 11:38 PM
Oly Oly is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
This one has always bothered me:

You've been as constant as the Northern Star
The brightest light that shines


Sorry, Mr Rafferty, but the Northern Star is pretty wimpy, brightness-wise. (Critique notwithstanding the prospect that the songwriter may, in fact, have proffered the smilie sarcastically. If so, strong work.)
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 09-20-2012, 11:46 PM
Mosier Mosier is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Against the Grain" by Garth Brooks
But sometimes you just can't be afraid to wear a different hat
If Columbus had complied
Then this old world might still be flat
Nope. Sorry Garth, but your grade school teachers lied to you.
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 09-21-2012, 12:04 PM
Trans Fat Og Trans Fat Og is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Just west of West Webster
Posts: 1,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oly View Post
This one has always bothered me:

You've been as constant as the Northern Star
The brightest light that shines
This.
(I put off contributing it as an example a bit too long.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oly View Post
(Critique notwithstanding the prospect that the songwriter may, in fact, have proffered the smilie sarcastically. If so, strong work.)
I don't think so at all. There is nothing about the song as a whole that suggests any sarcastic intent, for one thing. It strikes me as a very straightforward ballad of ultimate loving devotion.

In the immediate context, (while I could nitpick about Polaris being "constant" as marking celestial north for earth) it is essentially true considering the length of a human lifetime. If Rafferty were to be sarcastic about Polaris' apparent visual magnitude ("brightness") being overrated, he would presumably also be referring to the technical nitpick one could make about the precession of the equinoxes, or perhaps the fact that Polaris isn't exactly at the celestial north pole during this relative eye-wink of time that we live in. That, I am sure, is giving him far too much credit for knowledge and cleverness in sneaky sarcasm.

Besides, as you probably know, this is a fairly common misconception about Polaris. I mean, among people who take at least a passing interest in the stars. (I'm afraid that lately, with declining education and intellectual interest in America, many folks would be puzzled at the the very idea of a "Pole Star" or even why anyone at all would care.) Several years ago my local planetarium featured an entire program about various astronomical misconceptions, and this was perhaps the most striking. I wasn't surprised about its lack of prominence, since I had already no doubt memorized the three brightest stars by that time, but I may have been mildly surprised by how far down such a list it fell. The tone of the clarification was both "You have got to be kidding about it being #1" and "Many, many people are sold on the idea, and probably will continue to be so!"
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 09-21-2012, 12:12 PM
Irishman Irishman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oly View Post
This one has always bothered me:

You've been as constant as the Northern Star
The brightest light that shines


Sorry, Mr Rafferty, but the Northern Star is pretty wimpy, brightness-wise. (Critique notwithstanding the prospect that the songwriter may, in fact, have proffered the smilie sarcastically. If so, strong work.)
Nitpick, while the common interpretation is that he is calling the Northern Star the brightest light that shines, that is not the only parsing of the stanza.

He is listing traits, ways that his woman has been there for him. With tweaking of the punctuation, that reads as

"You've been as constant as the Northern Star.
The brightest light that shines,
it's been you, woman,
right down the line."

He's comparing her constancy to the Northern Star. He's also calling her the brightest light that shines.
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 09-22-2012, 07:54 AM
Oly Oly is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishman View Post
He's comparing her constancy to the Northern Star. He's also calling her the brightest light that shines.
While I like your alternate parsing possibility, wouldn't that just be replacing one factual error with another? (Unless, of course, the object of his affection is the Sun, in which case, I say, again, strong work, Mr Raffertry.)
Reply With Quote
  #191  
Old 09-23-2012, 12:33 AM
Irishman Irishman is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
No, that's just poetic expression. He's not saying she literally glows light.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright © 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC.