|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Goodfellas" Question: Running an "Independent" Crime Gang
This old flick was on yesterday-I watched some of it because I always enjoyed mob-type movies. at any rate, I understand that the movie version was pretty accurate..so I have a question:
the gang that Henry Hill belongs to is NOT a Mafia "Family"-it is an independent organization. In order to operate, it pays a percentage of its income to the local Mafia chapter. But, as Hill finds out, it's extremely difficult to avoid stepping on some "Made Member's" toes- when his friend is invited to join the Mafia, they shoot him in the head (at the "coming out" ceremony.) Was this how Henry's cocaine distribution business got busted? Was he working on someone else's territory? I got the feeling that he was set up by the local Mafia-they told the police about the operation, and getting rid of Hill was obviously what they wanted. In any case, Hill knew that he could never enlist in the regular Mob-you had to be 100% Sicilian to do so. |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Being "made" gave you a certain level of status and protection. I don't think it was ever implied or suggested that Henry was busted by the cops because someone from the Mafia-side ratted, he was busted because he got sloppy after he started using too much of his product. Yes, local boss Paul was against dealing dope, but he didn't have any role in Henry's getting pinched. Like Henry said in the voiceover, if he had crossed Paul irreparably, he would have been taken out like Tommy, not arrested.
Last edited by fiddlesticks; 09-27-2012 at 11:16 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Those old mob bosses hate drug dealing. I never understood if it was an ethical thing or if it just made it too easy to attract law enforcement .
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
As they said in the movie, cocaine and drug crimes in general get you a lot of time. Which in turn promotes someone ratting out a crew to not go to jail forever. Like what Henry Hill did and exactly why.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the Godfather at least, they mention that the cops and politicians on their payroll find it easier to turn a blind eye to "harmless" vices like gambling and prostitution.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Henry wasn't part of an "independent" crime family. He was associated with the Lucchese Family.
Henry Hill |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
The reason the mob boss did not want Henry dealing with drugs is because prosecutors were targeting drug dealers with the RICO act. Pauly could have been prosecuted for Henry's drug dealing because Henry was under Pauly in the mafia structure regardless of any actual involvement in the drug dealing. In general the Italian mafia did not use police to arrest people they wanted gone, they just killed them. Henry knew about numerous illegal actions by Pauly and ended up testifying against Pauly and his other fellow criminals. If Pauly had found out about the drug dealing there is no way he would have gone to the police about it.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Tamerlane; 09-27-2012 at 12:19 PM. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's a myth that the old mob bosses hated drug dealing. Carlo Gambino, Joe Bonnano, etc, all made millions from narcotics. Joe Bonnano went over to Palermo in the 50s to set up an arrangement with the Sicilian Mafia to import heroin into the US. Of course, in his self-serving autobiography he trots out the usual nonsense that he never dealt in narcotics. What the bosses did insist on was that narcotic trafficking was engaged in solely under the boss's orders. If they set up deals for themselves and were caught then they died.
As for independent gangs, many of the guys that worked with the Mafia had their own crews. Like the Westies' deal with Paul Castellano, some of the independent gang's profits would be kicked upstairs to the Mafia and in return the gang would be under Mafia protection in their dealings with other gangs. Core membership of the Mafia was kept deliberately small. Sometimes the 'books' were kept closed for years and years with no new members created, then they would open the books and some Italian-American associates would become 'made men' and full Mafiosi. (Another myth was that you had to be Sicilian. About the only NY boss that stuck to that was Salvatore Maranzano in the 1920s, but when Joe Bonnano took over that family the rule didn't last long. In general all you needed was both your parents to be of Italian ancestry. Albert Anastasia, for instance, was from Calabria and John Gotti was a Neapolitan. The Italian ancestry rule was strictly enforced, if only one parent was Italian you could never join the Mafia.) |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks-the Mafia bosses who ran the outlying cities (Boston, Providence RI, Buffalo) were a pretty low rent lot. Raymond Patriarca (Providence Mob Boss) was notoriously cheap-his "cover job" was running a vending machine company-which lost money. The last Boston boss to be busted was running a cheese shop.
But some of the associated gangs were terrible (the "Westies"-an Irish east Side mob-NYC) handled the contract killings for Paul Castellano-they were true psychopaths. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Patriarca's vending machines did not lose money for two very good reasons. One, people had to pay him rent to have his machines in their businesses. It was cover for his protection racket. Two, most of them were cigarette machines selling packs he never paid taxes on. All in all much nicer than having to haul garbage for your cover.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Do I understand correctly that the mafia's influence came from its ability to exert more violence than regular gangs and thereby protect other gangs? That would mean they had to be the biggest enforcer around. Yet their membership was small. How did they manage to set themselves up and continue to be the main source of violence/protection from other gangs if their membership was small? |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bigotry
. Also having an insular in-group at one time allowed greater internal control. Remember the mafia was more or less imported from Italy and was originally a highly clannish group.Quote:
If for example you go peruse the wikipedia on the Lucchese family, which Hill operated for, you'll see they list membership at 115-140 made members and 1,100+ associates. You can still make a pretty penny and gain a lot of influence without ever being made, a la Jimmy Burke. You just were locked out of the upper hierarchy. And if you were Italian, you could eventually hope to be made one day, as nearly happened with police infiltrator "Donnie Brasco." Gangs like the Westies that were not part of a crew, but rather were more like independent sub-contractors, usually didn't buck the system because they simply didn't have the organization or numbers that the Five Families, and on a more national level The Commission, could bring to bear. The Mafia dominated organized crime for so long because they were exceptionally well-organized and remained relatively impenetrable to outsiders for decades, in part due to that Italian clannishness. If you add up all the made men that wikipedia lists for the Five Families ( we'll set aside how accurate they may or may not be ) you get currently 670-820 made men and 5,000+ associates. That's a lot of potential organized muscle and there were undoubtedly more back in the day. Last edited by Tamerlane; 09-29-2012 at 10:09 PM. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
If I may ask broader questions:
How was the mafia well organized? You mention being a made man and the upper hierarchy. What advantages and obligations did being a made man bring? |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It was still chaotic and prone to internal violence - these are career criminals after all . But it was like the difference between say, the vicious military junta in Burma and the chaotic warlords in Somalia. Quote:
Last edited by Tamerlane; 09-29-2012 at 11:13 PM. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Chicago Outfit, arguably the single most powerful family of the Italian mafia had non-Italian made members.
Low life reprobates come from all walks of life. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not much of a fan of the gangster movie genre as they tend to glamorize scum. Goodfellas, however, did a nice job of avoiding that cliche. Indeed, one of the arcs was to glamorize the lifestyle at the beginning and then through the course of the movie show the reality of the grubby, sad lives they had.
Last edited by Lochdale; 09-30-2012 at 12:28 PM. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, except for how he misinterprets the movie on five or six major plot points, the OP raises a valid question?
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I've spent time with the guy a bunch of times, including hanging out at some old Chicago bars/restaurants that are definitely "connected." He's very nice, and soft-spoken, but if you piss him off he'll stare daggers right through your soul. He doesn't take kindly to cracks about Italians or organized crime (not me, but someone else made that mistake.) |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Anyway, who do you have lined up next? You've got eight months to pick someone. You weren't responsible for this, were you? Sorry about all the questions by the way. I'm not famous, so I'm probably not on your list. Good. Last edited by Ashley Pomeroy; 09-30-2012 at 05:29 PM. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am curious as to how come Hank and Jimmy escape punishment for Billy Batts death?
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As Big Pussy Bonpensiero told Christopher, "They know, but they don't know." As such, I think they didn't have enough to make a case against Henry and Jimmy, while Tommy's getting clipped was, in the words of Henry Hill, "It was revenge for Billy Batts, and a lot of other things." Ike, you're a New Yorker from way back, right? What do you remember from back then? |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Westies operated out of Hell's Kitchen, which is on the West side of Manhattan.
Last edited by The Other Jeffrey Lebowski; 09-30-2012 at 10:48 PM. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
So their name wasn't a clever ploy to throw off the police?
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, but it might have been a ploy to throw off ralph124c.
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Paul Cicero(played by Paul Sorvino) was in actuality Paul Vario, a lieutenant(or Capo if you prefer) for the Lucchese family. For those not aware, most of the people in the movie were given slightly different names than their real life counterparts. For example Jimmy Conway(played by Robert De Nero) was actually Jimmy Burke. |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
The advantage of being in the hierachy meant that everyone under you had to pay you part of their earnings. It is like multilevel marketing the more people under you the more you get paid for not working.
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Goodfellas and The Sopranos nailed it. There are nuances so well nuanced that most people will never understand how right they got it.
There are no set rules about some things, such as drugs. Drugs were an issue to some individuals, families, parts of families, etc. There's a set of intangibles about certain things that prevent anyone from making absolute statements. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Actually that was a nickname given to then by the newspapers. IIRC, they always referred to themselves as either "Coonan's crew" or "Hells Kitchen's Irish Mob." |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
I always assumed this was for artistic latitude; you didn't have to worry so much about straying from the truth since the characters were nominally fictional. Was there any additional reason or was that it?
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Possibly to avoid getting sued. Also it allowed them to compress certain events. For example, Henry Hill never went on double dates with Tommy DeSimmone(Tommy DeVito in the movie). Those were with Paul Vario's son or nephew(I can't remember which). |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
I consider compression to fall under "Artistic latitude" (telling a better story) but didn't know if there was a realistic chance of someone suing either for damages due to defamation or for part of the profits with their likeness being used.
|
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just have to add in my favorite bit of Goodfellas trivia. When Nicholas Pileggi was researching his book "Wiseguys," which the film is based on, he conducted a lot of interviews with Henry Hill. With Pileggi at those interviews was Pileggi's wife, the late Nora Ephron. Ephron took her own notes during the interviews and used them to write her own movie based on Hill - the Steve Martin/Rick Moranis mob/witness protection comedy My Blue Heaven.
My Blue Heaven came out a month before Goodfellas, so you could accurately call Goodfellas a prequel of MBH. |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, I had no idea about the genesis of My Blue Heaven. I'm going to have to watch it again.
And I'll watch Goodfellas again, because I don't seem to ever get tired of it. I may read Wiseguys again too. Last edited by Ike Witt; 10-06-2012 at 03:07 PM. |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the book Donnie Brasco, FBI Agent Joe Pistone (Johnny Depp's character in the movie version) emphasizes that one of the advantages to being "made" was that you were allowed to be present when Mafioso discussed business involving other crews/families or otherwise referenced activities that the made guy was not directly involved in. Of course, this would have been of extra importance to an undercover agent such as Pistone/Brasco, as being made would have made him privy to much more information that he could provide to the FBI.
|
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
With respect to the narcotics trade, isn't it true that the old Mafiosi had no objection to selling drugs in Harlem and other black neighborhoods, but were vehemently opposed to selling them to whites? (IIRC, this was a point made in The Godfather.)
If so, when did this change? The '70s? '80s? |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|