|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
HIPAA Suggestion
I was just being silly yesterday and had a thought that won't leave my mind. When doctors prescribe marijuana for medicinal use, they should be able to refuse to share their patients' names when the Feds raid by citing the right to privacy in HIPAA.
We can call it the "HIPAA pot among us" clause. |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
... I hate you.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The problem is that when marijuana is prescribed to mentally ill patients, they tend to give it away to their friends, or really anyone they consider "nice". The Feds need to know about this situation, so we would have to add a Sanity Clause.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Joe wants to try this, and so does Alice, but does Mary wanna?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
You can't fool me...
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Marijuana isn't prescribed, you get a recommendation from your doctor that allows you to get a card so you can buy it. At least in California.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
You are my new favorite person.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't get it...
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
https://www.marijuanadoctors.com/blo...ats-difference
The OP described it as a prescription, but it is not. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
True enough!
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
pre·scribe - Recommend (a substance or action) as something beneficial.
So, nothing factually inaccurate here. You even send the doctors recommend it. Thanks for playing though
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes it is inaccurate. It is not legally possible to prescribe Ina medical sense.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's worse than that. Some anesthesiologists have been found to be trading inhalants for sexual favors from Playboy models. So we have to contend with ether bunnies as well.
Last edited by Buck Godot; 11-29-2012 at 10:56 AM. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bravo!!!
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, there is, but only in Virginia.
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd find something to say against this, but that would be HIPAA-critical.
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
A card? Wouldn't toke-ens work better?
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think this is a classic “grass is always greener” scenario. If the HipAA Pot Among Us clause were activated a lot of citizens would get their noses out of joint. If I may be blunt, we would have to weed out these dopes (and all their buds) from society.
It’s a chronic problem. mmm |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
And because of the well-known munchies, food chains would want to get in on the action. Hence, Subway tokens, too.
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Marijuana comes in lollypop form too nowadays. One way or another we'll get this problem licked.
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think it's common knowledge, but apparently if you have a friend with medical marijuana, and you create a wordless tune while they are smoking, they basically have to let you smoke the rest of it. I just saw an article about it: "Lore in Back Hall: Hum, Free Bogart".
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
mmm |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
A hit? That would be such a drag.
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
I suppose they could issue the same card to two people: joint custody.
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
And the Health Care Reimbursement Fund through your employer which will fund the MM: your joint account.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|