FAQ 
Calendar 


#1




Physicists: What makes sense on this gigantic blackboard, and how much holds together topically?
In a current thread Can those brilliant professor types really look at those long ass equations on the whiteboard?, I posted the following example, and commented on it as an aside:
Quote:
Anyway, since I brought it up in a thread about how people can read (correct or "incorrect" symbols), it seemed kind of unfair to keep peopleincluding mehanging about this example. How far did the setdesigner/directors go in verisimilitude? Remember, also, that this is a snip from an anxiety dream, where logic is slippery. 
Advertisements  

#2




A lot of it seems to be too blurry to read in the linked pic.
Clearly, even if it all actually means something, it is unrealistic as a lecture. No student could take all that in at once. 
#3




Yeah, for sure.
You can click on the picture to see a large view of it if you want. 
#4




You can blow the JPG image up to full size, and then zoom in on it. Even so, I'm not getting a whole lot.
In the upper right corner, I see the wavelength/momentum equation (lambda = h/p), and a visual depiction of an electron as a wave function orbiting a nucleus. Halfway up the blackboard and a bit to our right of the instructor, I see an expression for total system momentum (P=sum (m1*v1 + m2*v2+...). At bottom, halfway between the instructor and our right end of the board, I see a visual depiction of a solenoid or transformer in cross section, showing the magnetic field lines. Over on our left half, there's a visual depiction of a differential element of solid angle (a steradian), along with the integral function using it to calculate total flux of some quantity (gravity, radiation, etc.) emanating from a point source in all directions. A pic at top left shows another example of electrical current in a loop interacting with magnetic field lines passing through the loop. That's about as much as I can make out. It seems likely that the rest of it has some basis in reality, e.g. they may have copied it all from a physics text, but not necessarily anything the Coen brothers could point to and say "this means *." 


#5




From a quick look, most of what I can make out seems to be straight from some introductory quantum mechanics coursethere's the old classic, the quantum harmonic oscillator both in 3d (in the form of its energy eigenvalues) and in 1d (in the form of the probability density for finding the particle at a certain position, if the system is in a certain statethe graphic with the sinusoidal line at the very top over the professor), Bohr's atom model (top right), the quantization of spin, etc. There's also some special relativity, and a bit of electrodynamics (I can make out at least a couple of Maxwell's equations). Some of the things appear to hang togetherthere seems to be a discussion of the volume element in spherical coordinates, which might be related to the calculation of the energy levels of the three dimensional harmonic oscillator, and it seems that a discussion about magnetic dipoles was used to introduce spin, but for others, there does not seem to be any obvious connectionI'm not sure what the relativistic energymomentum relation does there, for instance.
One thing I can't place is the quite central bit with the arrows and (what looks like) Hebrew symbols; it looks vaguely familiar, but perhaps not from a physics context? And of course, one question all those equations can't solve: how the heck did he manage to write all the way up there? 
#6




Quantum teleportation.

#7




I did that before my original post, thanks very much. Much of it is still too blurry to read. I am not denying that some parts may be recognizable (or guessable at).
Last edited by njtt; 07172013 at 02:51 PM. 
#8




The symbols (alephs and tsades) I believe are used in infinite (or transfinite) mathematics.
Last edited by Prof. Pepperwinkle; 07172013 at 02:57 PM. 
#9




All of it seems to be legitimate physics (or possibly math, in the case of the alephs), but it's drawn from all over the place in physics. No single course would contain all those concepts, much less any single lecture.



#10




The vast majority of it looks like straightforward quantum mechanics: energy eigenvalues of the harmonic oscillator, some bits about quantum numbers, spin and magnetic moment for an electron, Schrodinger's equation written out with vector notation, something about spherical harmonics, etc. The panel to the immediate right of the lecturer looks like electromagnetism in relativistic quantum mechanics. The drawing on the far left looks like a description of some sort of atomic process (I can't see enough detail to be more specific), and the one on the bottom right might be a history of atomic models. I have no idea what the Hebrew letters on the panel to the left of the lecturer are supposed to represent; I've only seem them used in set theory (and the diagram makes no sense in that context), not in physics (but I'm a mathematician, not a physicist, and not really even a mathematical physicist). The bit about L^2 immediately above it is very standard quantum mechanics, at least.
Last edited by Itself; 07172013 at 04:02 PM. 
#11




Another physicist here to chime in that this is basically a collage of various physics concepts, without any particular unifying theme. However, it's worth pointing out that the Hebrew letters may also have been included because the main character (the professor in the picture) is Jewish, and spends most of the movie trying to figure out what God wants from him.

#12




Alephs and beths I know in that context, but what do the tsades signify? Maybe, as MikeS said, one should rather look at a religious context for this bit of symbology...

#13




To continue: Cat and toddler thinking about gravitation?
http://imgur.com/DpIggh0 How together is the math? FTR, I revived this thread, and not the one cited in OP, or http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/...d.php?t=757515, which are similar, if you're into this type of thing. 
#14




It occurs to me that the dynamics and ductus of the notation and graphing on the board are that of someone fluent and comfortable in the field.
Which makes me wonder in particular about the crossed out part, if it's jokey in addition. (Handwriting analysis glossary: http://atozhandwriting.com/grapholog...tinganalysis/) 


#15




Quote:

#16




Thanks for the proper cite. I was unhappy about not having it, but the artist's name was visible.
And the crossedout part? 
#17




Looks like a partial definition of the Einstein tensor, also with the cosmological constant thrown in for good measure. It's certainly conceivable that these two would be in the same equation. As far as I can tell, the equation isn't complete; but it's not unheard of to start writing down an equation, realize as you're writing it that it's better expressed in a different way, and scratch it out and rewrite it. (I do it all the time.)

#18




And I would assume that the diagrams are meant to represent wormholes.

#19




OK class. Last time, we had a kid and a cat, very popular Internet topics. Today we have a another popular item, a pretty woman.
http://imgur.com/CHHXHVP Same query as OP. Extra credit: cite most likely source. ETA: of the math for the set designer Last edited by Leo Bloom; 09022016 at 11:40 AM. 
#21




The blackboard is from Interstellar, but I can't make out enough of the math to see what it's aboutto the left, there's something about 'brane' and 'curvature', which would make sense in the context of some hypothetical future gravitational theoryIIRC, they were hypothesizing about a kind of 'braneworld'scenario, where our universe is just a kind of surfacea branein a higherdimensional space. The bits in braces seem to be mostly values for certain parameters.
The movie had Kip Thorne as a scientific advisor, so most of the physics (on the blackboard) is probably speculative, but not outrageously soin fact, he's written a book, The Science of Interstellar, which should cover most of what's on those boards. (By the way, do you just do google searches for 'math blackboard' every once in a while, or how do you find these?) Last edited by Half Man Half Wit; 09022016 at 12:38 PM. 
#22




You can actually see Thorne having a look at the stuff on the blackboard in this picture.

#23




Yeah, it's tough to say much about this latest picture without context (those Ws could stand for almost anything), but it does appear to be tensors of some sort, which is consistent with it being GR.
The fact that the Ws have subscripts of "w" and "y" suggests, to me, that there's a w coordinate being used in addition to the familiar x, y, z, and t, which would be consistent with it being brane work. 
#24




Quote:
But in Googling around for that image (actually, Binging, but sucks to be Microsoft), I did find this, the source of which I did _not_ see, but is worth mentioning because it is not dissimilar in presentation to others: https://imgur.com/DnAKFWV 
Reply 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

