The Straight Dope

Go Back   Straight Dope Message Board > Main > Cafe Society

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2017, 01:18 AM
Dale Sams Dale Sams is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Sci-Fi weapons with BAD design flaws

Death Star...no not THAT flaw...can only fire its mega weapon at approximentally 40%(?) of its viewable area at any one time. It really needs escorts. That it was unaccompanied by escorts should have been a dead giveaway that it WAS A TRAP!!

Doomsday Machine. Ok granted you can't penetrate its neutronium hull, but that doesn't mean you have to do strafing runs. Just sit over its axis. And btw....that thing being so ancient?? It would have its own eco-system by the time Enterprise encountered it.

Imperial walkers. Of ffs, stop flying in front of them. Ok yes theyre shielded. Still.

Others?
Reply With Quote
Advertisements  
  #2  
Old 01-30-2017, 01:57 AM
coremelt coremelt is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Tie Fighters: The "wings" are either heat sinks or solar panels depending on who you believe. Either way they're a terrible design since they cut off a fair chunk of visibility for the pilot and don't seem to serve any purpose as armour.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2017, 02:51 AM
snfaulkner snfaulkner is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2015
Pulse rifles firing 10mm explosive tip caseless standard light armor piercing rounds are good for rupturing primary heat exchangers inside what are basically giant fusion reactors.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:35 AM
Dr. Strangelove Dr. Strangelove is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Of course, the whole point of a Doomsday Machine is lost if you keep it a secret! Why didn't you tell the world, eh?

Spaceball 1/Mega Maid had a self-destruct button which was too easily pressed, and irreversible (like a rain coat).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:39 AM
MrDibble MrDibble is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Light sabres need crossguards.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:55 AM
Der Trihs Der Trihs is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
From one of the Vorkosigan novels I recall this quote on the subject of buying weapons:

"Stay away from the sale on neutron hand grenades. For those with a strong throwing arm."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-30-2017, 06:41 AM
CalMeacham CalMeacham is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 40,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Der Trihs View Post
From one of the Vorkosigan novels I recall this quote on the subject of buying weapons:

"Stay away from the sale on neutron hand grenades. For those with a strong throwing arm."
Actually, the real-life version was almost as bad.

The Davy Crockett was the smallest nuke the US ever designed and built. It had extremely poor shielding (so even hauling the thing around was dangerous) and no abort function. If it was fired, it would go off. And if it didn't go far enough, you were screwed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_C...lear_device%29
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-30-2017, 06:57 AM
BeepKillBeep BeepKillBeep is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Sams View Post
Death Star...no not THAT flaw...can only fire its mega weapon at approximentally 40%(?) of its viewable area at any one time. It really needs escorts. That it was unaccompanied by escorts should have been a dead giveaway that it WAS A TRAP!!
This is not so. The Death Star was bristling with turbo laser and blaster batteries. We even see them in the movies. The Death Star definitely did not need escort ships.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-30-2017, 07:03 AM
asterion asterion is offline
2012 SDMB NFL Salary Cap Champ
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 10,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalMeacham View Post
Actually, the real-life version was almost as bad.

The Davy Crockett was the smallest nuke the US ever designed and built. It had extremely poor shielding (so even hauling the thing around was dangerous) and no abort function. If it was fired, it would go off. And if it didn't go far enough, you were screwed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_C...lear_device%29
The Fat Man from Fallout is objectively a terrible idea. A man-portable (not crew-served) nuclear weapon launched via catapult on the battlefield. The only thing that makes it work is the game mechanics.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-30-2017, 07:49 AM
CalMeacham CalMeacham is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 40,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by asterion View Post
The Fat Man from Fallout is objectively a terrible idea. A man-portable (not crew-served) nuclear weapon launched via catapult on the battlefield. The only thing that makes it work is the game mechanics.
The Wikipedia article notes the similarity between the Davy Crockett and the Fat Man.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-30-2017, 08:01 AM
muldoonthief muldoonthief is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 9,536
A phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range is ideal for home defense, but can be very difficult to find.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-30-2017, 08:25 AM
RickJay RickJay is offline
Charter Jays Fan
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Oakville, Canada
Posts: 37,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by muldoonthief View Post
A phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range is ideal for home defense, but can be very difficult to find.
Hey, just whatcha see, pal.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-30-2017, 08:30 AM
Just Asking Questions Just Asking Questions is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Next Gen "dustbuster" phasers. There appears to be no aiming mechanism at all, not even a rudimentary bump on top to aim by. I'm not convinced the beam even comes out in the same direction each time. It seems to be controlled more by the special effects folks than the actual internal mechanism.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-30-2017, 08:45 AM
Steve MB Steve MB is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 11,514
My favorite is the lampshade hanging on the Goa'uld staff weapon:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack O'Neill
This (holds up staff weapon) is a weapon of terror. It's made to intimidate the enemy. This (holds up P90 SMG) is a weapon of war. It's made to kill the enemy.
__________________
The Internet: Nobody knows if you're a dog. Everybody knows if you're a jackass.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-30-2017, 08:47 AM
RealityChuck RealityChuck is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Schenectady, NY, USA
Posts: 40,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Asking Questions View Post
Next Gen "dustbuster" phasers. There appears to be no aiming mechanism at all, not even a rudimentary bump on top to aim by. I'm not convinced the beam even comes out in the same direction each time. It seems to be controlled more by the special effects folks than the actual internal mechanism.
It good design. It's just piss poor tactics. Trying to am a phaser is like trying to aim a machine gun: why bother?

The way to use the phasers is to wave them back and forth in the general direction of the enemy. The beams are traveling at the speed of light; no one is going to dodge that.
__________________
"East is East and West is West and if you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce they taste much more like prunes than rhubarb does."
Purveyor of fine science fiction since 1982.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-30-2017, 08:54 AM
scr4 scr4 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13,115
The Death Star has a more inexplicable flaw - while it can travel interstellar distances in a matter of days, it takes hours to get to the other side of a planet.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-30-2017, 09:05 AM
Maus Magill Maus Magill is offline
Not a real doctor.
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nolensville, TN
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by scr4 View Post
The Death Star has a more inexplicable flaw - while it can travel interstellar distances in a matter of days, it takes hours to get to the other side of a planet.
"I say we're in range now." - What Tarkin should have said.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-30-2017, 09:42 AM
gnoitall gnoitall is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealityChuck View Post
It good design. It's just piss poor tactics. Trying to am a phaser is like trying to aim a machine gun: why bother?

The way to use the phasers is to wave them back and forth in the general direction of the enemy. The beams are traveling at the speed of light; no one is going to dodge that.
Unless you're a Scalosian all hopped up on whatever radiation-induced weirdness makes them move faster than the Flash on meth. Then you can sidestep a phaser II beam just fine.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-30-2017, 09:47 AM
gnoitall gnoitall is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maus Magill View Post
"I say we're in range now." - What Tarkin should have said.
While it's true that a Grand Moff doesn't have to be reasonable or patient, it doesn't make the attack on Yavin IV practical until it's actually practical. The Death Star had to get around Yavin, the gas giant primary, to get a shot at the inhabited moon.

I suppose he should have had the on-duty navigator spaced* for not bringing the Death Star out of hyperspace with a clear line of fire. Seems like orbital insertion planning is a serious training shortfall in the Imperial Fleet.

*He even could have used Darth Vader's line: "You have failed me for the last time."
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-30-2017, 09:50 AM
Intergalactic Gladiator Intergalactic Gladiator is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,294
Maybe they had to come out of hyperspace on the other side of Yavin. Flying through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, you know.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-30-2017, 09:58 AM
Darren Garrison Darren Garrison is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnoitall View Post
While it's true that a Grand Moff doesn't have to be reasonable or patient, it doesn't make the attack on Yavin IV practical until it's actually practical. The Death Star had to get around Yavin, the gas giant primary, to get a shot at the inhabited moon.
I believe he was alluding to this.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-30-2017, 09:59 AM
The Stainless Steel Rat The Stainless Steel Rat is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Close to the Saturn V
Posts: 6,016
Both Stars (Trek and Wars) have all these advanced ships with these ultra-modern weapons, but when they engage each other it's always in sighting distance of the other ship, a few thousand miles at most. You'd think that someone would have developed weapons that worked a long distances by now...which they have, no reason phasers or turbo lasers only have a limited range.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-30-2017, 10:19 AM
Jonathan Chance Jonathan Chance is online now
Domo Arigato Mister Moderato
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: On the run with Kilroy
Posts: 20,154
My big issue with the whole Death Star Yavin IV thing is why didn't someone say, "Fuck it, blow up the gas giant."

I don't know what it would do to an orbiting moon but I'm willing to bet it won't be anything good.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-30-2017, 10:26 AM
Chronos Chronos is offline
Charter Member
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 68,731
You're assuming that the destructive capacity of the Death Star is "One planet", regardless of size. Just because it can destroy an Earth-sized world doesn't mean that it can destroy a gas giant.

Speaking of Death Stars, the Starkiller Base from Ep. 7 has a big advantage over the original, in that it can fire through hyperspace, meaning that you don't have to bring it to the target. But it still needs to be hyper-capable, because each shot uses up a star, and so you need to bring it to a new star every time you fire it.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-30-2017, 10:44 AM
AtomicDog AtomicDog is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2000
The Ultimate Nullifier. Destroys not only its target but its wielder, with the potential to destroy the universe. So what was Galactus going to use it for?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-30-2017, 10:48 AM
Jophiel Jophiel is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
Speaking of Death Stars, the Starkiller Base from Ep. 7 has a big advantage over the original, in that it can fire through hyperspace, meaning that you don't have to bring it to the target. But it still needs to be hyper-capable, because each shot uses up a star, and so you need to bring it to a new star every time you fire it.
Yeah, I was thinking about that. There's a lot of stars in the galaxy but they're not exactly conveniently placed by one another. And sometimes the closest star is going to be one you want to still be around later. That's a lot of shuffling around for bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-30-2017, 11:11 AM
Maus Magill Maus Magill is offline
Not a real doctor.
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nolensville, TN
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darren Garrison View Post
I believe he was alluding to this.
Close - There was one where he just blew up Yavin.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-30-2017, 11:34 AM
CalMeacham CalMeacham is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 40,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtomicDog View Post
The Ultimate Nullifier. Destroys not only its target but its wielder, with the potential to destroy the universe. So what was Galactus going to use it for?
Possibly he was just keeping it there so no one else would use it. Its origin is never explained, IIRC. If I knew that one of the few things in the universe that could destroy me existed, I'd want to keep an eye on it.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-30-2017, 11:35 AM
Darren Garrison Darren Garrison is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maus Magill View Post
Close - There was one where he just blew up Yavin.
Yeah, that's the one I thought the link was, didn't even realize that there was a different version. And they might as well. Blowing up a gas giant is only a couple of orders of magnitude more idiotic than blowing up a planet.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-30-2017, 12:49 PM
tonyfop tonyfop is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Question: If Yavin was a gas giant, couldn't they just shoot through the top few layers and hit the moon behind it? Why wait for visual, or do they have no over-the horizon capability?
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 01-30-2017, 02:03 PM
Steve MB Steve MB is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 11,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyfop View Post
Question: If Yavin was a gas giant, couldn't they just shoot through the top few layers and hit the moon behind it? Why wait for visual, or do they have no over-the horizon capability?
If the moon is close enough to the planet's edge to be an achievable shot through "the top few layers" (instead of just blocked outright by the gas giant's bulk), a small shift sideways would give them a clear shot, so they might as well wait for that.
__________________
The Internet: Nobody knows if you're a dog. Everybody knows if you're a jackass.

Last edited by Steve MB; 01-30-2017 at 02:04 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-30-2017, 02:59 PM
Chronos Chronos is offline
Charter Member
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: The Land of Cleves
Posts: 68,731
Keep in mind, too, that the Death Star was relatively untested, only having ever made one full-power shot before that. So they probably weren't entirely sure what it would do to the gas giant, or how much matter would be sufficient to block it. At worst, a hit on the gas giant might have caused an explosion or other reaction which might damage the station.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:06 PM
msmith537 msmith537 is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Stainless Steel Rat View Post
Both Stars (Trek and Wars) have all these advanced ships with these ultra-modern weapons, but when they engage each other it's always in sighting distance of the other ship, a few thousand miles at most. You'd think that someone would have developed weapons that worked a long distances by now...which they have, no reason phasers or turbo lasers only have a limited range.
The weapons don't seem all that powerful either. Even when the shields are down, the worst a photon torpedo or phaser seems to do is maybe put a cannonball hole in the hull and short out some control panels.

A modern anti-ship missile or torpedo will basically do this to a warship. These guys are firing anti-matter bombs at each other.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:11 PM
mixdenny mixdenny is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
I always thought the Star Wars laser cannons were silly. Speed of light weapon that has no targeting and has to be aimed from a WWII ball turret, like a B52.

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:13 PM
DrDeth DrDeth is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 32,618
Blasters and Phasers dont seem to be any much better than modern small arms. Except Phasers can stun.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:15 PM
Dale Sams Dale Sams is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Fan-wank on some of these.

Phasers don't move at the speed of light. In "Q-Who" they move as slow as a camera pans even.

Star Trek ships clobbering each other in visual range? My fan-wank is some kind of anti-weapon warfare means they HAVE to get that close.

Starkiller. Why does everyone assume it drained the entire star? (I mean it may have but that wasn't what I thought on initial viewing) I thought it just 'dimmed' the star, and the star would eventually return to normal.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:20 PM
Dale Sams Dale Sams is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
Blasters and Phasers dont seem to be any much better than modern small arms. Except Phasers can stun.
As said above...in theory a phaser would be as effective as a "Death flashlight" Hell they even have a wide beam setting.

But I can only recall it being used once to sweep a group of people. That crappy second season TNG ep with the mute diplomat.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:28 PM
Morbo Morbo is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: 123 Fake Street
Posts: 9,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
Blasters and Phasers dont seem to be any much better than modern small arms. Except Phasers can stun.
Blasters can stun too, which IIRC was used exactly one time.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:31 PM
Skywatcher Skywatcher is offline
Uncharted
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Somewhere in the Potomac
Posts: 30,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by asterion View Post
The Fat Man from Fallout is objectively a terrible idea. A man-portable (not crew-served) nuclear weapon launched via catapult on the battlefield. The only thing that makes it work is the game mechanics.
Nuka Grenades in 4 aren't much better. Better be sure they won't be coming back! Learned this the hard way having played around with them in 3 and never got injured by bad bounces.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:40 PM
Finagle Finagle is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Somewhere near Boston
Posts: 9,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeth View Post
Blasters and Phasers dont seem to be any much better than modern small arms. Except Phasers can stun.
Well, Phasers are intelligent weapons. They can heat a rock to glowing heat or, just as easily, completely disintegrate a person leaving no residue, depending on the current need :-)

I once read an article (Larry Niven? Isaac Asimov?) on the whole idea of laser pistols. Apparently, not a really great idea. If the other guy is wearing the right color garment, it might just (briefly) reflect off. And you don't get a nice hole when you shoot someone -- you get, at the cost of a massive expenditure of energy, a messy sort of steam explosion. Hard to see any real benefit vs passing a piece of high velocity steel or lead through the same object. Maybe for long distances, you don't have to worry about windage or gravity, but you do have to worry about diffraction and beam spreadage. Also, if there are any specular surfaces around, you could put your eye out.


Also, I wouldn't want to be *anywhere* around a variable sword or any other type of monofilament infinitely sharp weapon unless I was wearing a protective suit, because the mere idea of fighting or even being in the same room with a flailing length of "cut anything in half" gives me the willies.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 01-30-2017, 03:54 PM
Blue Blistering Barnacle Blue Blistering Barnacle is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixdenny View Post
I always thought the Star Wars laser cannons were silly. Speed of light weapon that has no targeting and has to be aimed from a WWII ball turret, like a B52.

Dennis
A lot of Star Wars "silly" stuff is what makes it so good. Yes, it needs a LOT of fan-wonking, but...

Not a great show if everyone is blowing up everyone else from bunkers and ships so far away no one sees anything.

The WWII turrets with flash-zip-bang and screeching fighters were way cool. I fan-wonked the noise by imagining that they had wired the ships to provide better auditory feedback.

But it was pretty cool how a farmhand or pilot could basically take their ships and droids apart, maybe slap on a patch or modification, put it back together, and off you go...

It's a return to pirate movies and a retreat from 2001: a Space Odyssey.

I guess my point is that things ought to be a bit silly.


(BTW- despite my above post, I hated the episode VII planet buster. What!? a biggerer betterer planet buster? What will they think of next?)
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:06 PM
Trinopus Trinopus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 21,822
Another real-life story: in an autobiography of a WWII B-29 pilot, the author wrote of accidentally dropping all his bombs...while the plane was stationary on the field. He pushed the wrong button.

Later re-designs shielded the button.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:26 PM
RadicalPi RadicalPi is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2009
The weapons in Galaxy Quest look suspiciously like submarine sandwiches with triggers.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:27 PM
Ethilrist Ethilrist is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
TOS phasers had five settings: Heat, Stun, Disrupt, Dematerialize and Overload. On a slide selector. Try to set it to "make the wall go away" in the middle of a firefight and... boom.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:44 PM
Drum God Drum God is offline
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central Texas, USA
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trinopus View Post
Another real-life story: in an autobiography of a WWII B-29 pilot, the author wrote of accidentally dropping all his bombs...while the plane was stationary on the field. He pushed the wrong button.

Later re-designs shielded the button.
So, how did that not leave him in a crater afterward? How were the errant bombs cleaned up without blowing a hole in the tarmac?
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:47 PM
BeepKillBeep BeepKillBeep is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadicalPi View Post
The weapons in Galaxy Quest look suspiciously like submarine sandwiches with triggers.
Oh great now I want a sub for supper.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-30-2017, 05:01 PM
snfaulkner snfaulkner is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drum God View Post
So, how did that not leave him in a crater afterward? How were the errant bombs cleaned up without blowing a hole in the tarmac?
I think the detonators arm themselves from an impeller on the nose of the bomb. Falling a few feet wouldn't be enough to arm themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 01-30-2017, 05:07 PM
Ethilrist Ethilrist is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
I bet it was enough to make the ground crew wet themselves, though...
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 01-30-2017, 05:15 PM
Alessan Alessan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Are SW blasters laser weapons? I always assumed that they fired charged particle beams.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 01-30-2017, 05:47 PM
Declan Declan is offline
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepKillBeep View Post
This is not so. The Death Star was bristling with turbo laser and blaster batteries. We even see them in the movies. The Death Star definitely did not need escort ships.
The DS was armed to hold off capital ships, not fighter attacks. Even when the republican forces started their attack run, they only had 30 x and y wings, so when Darth takes it to them, they only had maybe four or five ties on screen, when they should have had 10 or 20 squadrons hitting the republicans in a meeting engagement, even before they got within range of the DS.

The only thing that we can conclude from this, is that the DS was designed to be assaulted by Imperial forces, should the commander of said DS go rogue and reach for the purple. As that worthy would have been the second most powerful man in the galaxy, with no apparent fail safes.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@chicagoreader.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Publishers - interested in subscribing to the Straight Dope?
Write to: sdsubscriptions@chicagoreader.com.

Copyright 2017 Sun-Times Media, LLC.