|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dammit! I can't take this anymore.
That darned word trips me up every time. Whenever I'm forced to use it, I randomly pick one and hope it's right. If it isn't, I hope others will assume it's a typo. For God's sake, enlighten me!! Which one is it? |
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Nobody."
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
it is: no one
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ahh, pldennison. My old nemesis.
I get the impression you were kidding, but you do have a point. Could all instances when I'd normally use 'no one' (Thanks navtechie & Perderabo) be changed to nobody? For instance- 'No one is here' could be changed to 'nobody is here'. Likewise, 'no one I know likes physics' could be changed to 'noboby I know likes physics'. I more confused now than I was before. Is using 'no one' ever acceptable? (Grammer is the bane of my existance. This post alone has presented me with more damn questions than the original post. I hate grammatical rules and regulations- me no likey.) |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is the sentence "There is no one way to do this" but obviously, that's a different meaning. I can't think of any cases that retain the meaning where "no one" cannot be replaced easily with "nobody".
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know this.
No one who knows anyone with a 'Collins English Dictionary' will doubt that someone using 'no one' can also use 'no-one' as an acceptable alternative. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
(Music maestro, please) No one knows the trouble I seen...
__________________
Arnold Winkelried: 'glee, I take my hat off to you.... at first I thought you were kidding with your cite but I looked it up and it was indeed accurate. (Still in awe at the magnificent answer)' |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|