I weep for today’s youth. With Called ID becoming more and more prevalent, prank calling is becoming a thing of the past.
Gone forever are the days of calling the bowling alley and asking the attendant if he has 8-pound balls (“Holy crap, how big are your pants?”) or calling the KFC and asking the guy if he has chicken wings. (“Must be hard to buy shirts then!”)
Owning a computer store I once got the following call:
“Do you have Prince Albert in a can?”
“No. This is a computer store.”
“Well, you better… uh… what?”
“I said, ‘No, this is a computer store.’ We don’t sell tobacco.”
“Oh.”
(long pause)
“Do you know anyone who does sell tobacco? Do you have their phone number?”
I’m just amazed that this classic prank call has hung on for as long as it has, especially in America. All of the important referents are nearly unknown to the prank-call target demographic. How many know who Prince Albert was, or have seen a can of loose tobacco, or even know where to find a tobacco shop?
They will probably learn to use the extra digits which block the ID, and a retail establishment cannot afford to ignore non-ID calls. They’ll cope.
What strikes me is that I don’t think I’ve heard one of these things that wouldn’t have worked 30 years ago. Surely new types of businesses and merchandise has created new possibilities. Not to mention the survival of some of them long past the passing of the relevent referents, as observed by paperbackwriter.
Actually I just wanted an excuse to add the call to the butcher “Do you have pig’s feet?” - “Well, wear shoes and nobody will notice”.
I never heard anyone consider that Prince Albert might be in the toilet. With all due respect, that makes no sense to me whatsoever.
The question “Do you have Prince Albert in a can” is a legitimate question to a tobacco shop. That’s what makes the punch line so funny. Well. At least to bunch of bored third graders. (Not that I’m admitting I ever made that call. )
I can understand how this “joke” could be confused over. In fact, I never got the joke up until now either.
Up here where I live (Saskatchewan, Canada), there is a city named Prince Albert, and concequently, I have never heard of or even seen any “Prince Albert” brand cigarettes (even on my many visits to the U.S.).
For years I tried to comprehend what was so funny about the city of Prince Albert being shoved into a can and laughed over :smack:
Prince Albert tobacco-I thought the Prince Albert in question here would be his son, Prince Albert who became Edward VII. Certainly, that’s the guy on the package-it’s definitely a picture of Edward VII and not Albert Sr.
As I heard it, the prank line was “You’d better let him out before he suffocates”.
That is, unless one has an airtight loo. Then I suppose either mental image is proper.
Actually, as should be obvious by now, the joke is told two different ways. Neither makes a lot of sense, but of course this is a joke that is mainly amusing to 10-year-olds.
If you say “Do you have Prince Albert in a can,” you have in mind the Prince being inside the can of tobacco.
If you say “Do you have Prince Albert in the can,” (and this is the way I have mostly heard it) you are counting on the tobacconist to ignore the fact that you said “the” instead of “a,” and you have in mind the Prince being locked in the toilet.