To JepSnertRF:
True, true. And TV tends to extract only superficial aspects of human interaction for simple entertainment, depriving the viewer of the full potential of human contact.
Nobody ever said using a TV as a substitute for a social life or using porn as a substitute for a romantic life is supposed to be healthy. But it doesn’t make using either in moderation inherently bad, either.
Oh, objectification my arse. What’s the big deal here, exactly? I certainly won’t be bothered if any ladies want to look at pornographic pictures of guys or whatever. Like Jpeg Jones said, anybody whose interaction with real people is affected by something trivial like porn has other problems.
To use my previous example, TV also takes attention away from normal interaction with the partner, etc. Porn or any other impersonal medium is not a substitute for real people and isn’t supposed to be. Everything can be harmful if taken to extremes, but looking at porn now and then is only a big deal if somebody in the relationship decides to make it a big deal. As I said before, my girlfriend and I both look at porn occasionally and will swap any particularly good stuff we find. If that’s hurt our relationship any, that’s be news to us…
Note that in no way am I defending addiction/obsession with porn, kiddie porn or anything else blatantly harmful, etc.
Anyhow, you’ve offered some reasonable arguments why pornography is a bad thing, which is a worthwhile topic. But like ThunderBunny did before you’ve missed the original idea of the thread. Can you give any arguments why the LAW should concern itself with porn?