If this is some sort of poll, put me down for D/s and lots of lesbians. Latex ain’t bad either.
Thank you.
well of course, if it’s being sent to your mailbox, why would you need to search for it? 
No, I shouldn’t have. Trust me on this.
(Where’s that ‘barf’ smiley when you need one?)
When I’m 90, I hope I’m still a horny old goat, but I sure wouldn’t want to see pix of me in action at that age.
lol…well, thats probably a good point at that. However, those who like that kind of thing and are not as fortunate as I to have to constantly put in their junk mail folder may still need to do some kind of search I would assume.
IS this a poll?
-XT
With all these people looking for “teen porn” and “teen sex” I guess there must be a lot of twenty year old women feeling desperate and lonely now that their peak years are past. Ladies, I feel your pain. Call me.
This offer is open to women over twenty as well.
Does “free bestiality” really need a thesis?
Well, one thing that seems pretty clear from those stats is that whatever form of entertainment people want to find online, they want it “free”. THAT bit should surprise absolutely noone.
I do remember reading in a thread of porno movies names about The Lord of the G-string
:smack:
I guess this confirms Rule 34.
plumper
I think “BBW” is the phrase/category.
This is a hijack, but so what about the consent when it’s an animal? We can already hitch it to a plough or a cart, or ride it over fences, or steal its fur or its milk, or cage it and make it run its reproductive cycle once a day just so we can eat the product, or feed it medicines that we’re debugging, or kill it for meat or hide or fun, all without its consent, so why choke on the gnat when it comes to fucking it? Very properly we consider consent to be paramount when it’s a matter of human rights, but it’s bizarre to even think it applies to an animal.
[sarcasm on] Because sex is DIfferent. Sex is BEAUTIFUL and MAGICAL and an EXPRESSION OF LOOOOOOOOOVE! :rolleyes: [/sarcasm off. . . maybe]
More people by far search for preteen models than teen porn… :eek:
-FrL-
Isn’t that illegal? How can websites advertise such stuff? (I’m a bit out of things here)
-XT
It turns out, there are very few sites that support the underage stuff. It seems like a lot at first but they all end you up in the same couple of sites, all Eastern European or Russian. The number of searches for teen porn should be taken with a grain of salt because the results are not only liable to get you anything, including 90-yr-olds, but the definition of “teen” seems to stretch to nearly thirty. Even the ones guaranteeing real teens are loaded with disclaimers that all of the models were at least 18 when their pictures were taken.
Disclaimer: The creepy, underage junk is not to my taste. I was doing REAL research for a friend who was writing a novel that has a publisher and a release date and can be sent through the mail without a plain, brown wrapper. And my research was limited to free sites in English I could get to fairly easily because, when the pay for all my work, viral damage to my system, and personal damage to my reputation is a free copy of the book (“But it will be autographed!”), there are limits to what I’m willing to do.
Maybe they’re holding out for someone who doesn’t have the word “little” as part of his name.
I think that “teen” mostly just means “hasn’t had a boob job.”
I suppose all of those things are immoral.
That strikes me as the most profound explanation I’ve ever seen on the subject. Well done sir.