Straight Dope Message Board

Straight Dope Message Board (https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/index.php)
-   Politics & Elections (https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   General election polls: of value when? (https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=892279)

DSeid 03-21-2020 08:19 PM

General election polls: of value when?
 
Many have, when head to head polls against Trump were cited in support of candidate A or B, oft-repeated that general election head to head polls are not very useful too early on. True that.

But now we have a presumptive nominee and while the general is not right around the corner it starts to get close enough to make me wonder:

When DO general election head to head polls begin to have any predictive value? (Smart asses who want to say never can just not bother please.)

iiandyiiii 03-21-2020 08:22 PM

I'm assuming they're of value when Nate Silver's website has a general election model up and running.

dalej42 03-21-2020 11:15 PM

Iíd say after both conventions are over is a good starting point. An election year typically features party out of power convention, Olympics, party in power convention as summer draws to a close and Labor Day approaches. 2020 may be different as summer vacation season might not exist if thereís 25% unemployment.

RTFirefly 03-22-2020 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSeid (Post 22202887)
Many have, when head to head polls against Trump were cited in support of candidate A or B, oft-repeated that general election head to head polls are not very useful too early on. True that.

But now we have a presumptive nominee and while the general is not right around the corner it starts to get close enough to make me wonder:

When DO general election head to head polls begin to have any predictive value? (Smart asses who want to say never can just not bother please.)

According to this oft-quoted cite, the head-to-heads start having predictive value about 300 days before the general election. IOW, about the second week in January. By now, per the graph, they've got an r2 of about .5, which is of course way less than certainty, but still pretty good.

DSeid 03-22-2020 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RTFirefly (Post 22203428)
According to this oft-quoted cite, the head-to-heads start having predictive value about 300 days before the general election. IOW, about the second week in January. By now, per the graph, they've got an r2 of about .5, which is of course way less than certainty, but still pretty good.

Thank you. Thatís the article I was thinking of but unable to find!

So we are pretty much on a flat portion of the curve with a little correlation now that begins to gradually get better more beginning August on. Which makes sense.

Thanks again.

chappachula 03-22-2020 09:35 AM

Quote:

So we are pretty much on a flat portion of the curve with a little correlation now that begins to gradually get better more beginning August on...... makes sense
It might make sense mathematically....but , like the math of the stock market, past performance does not prove anything.

This year is unlike anything we have ever experienced in our lives. Right now, it's still amusing...we trade stories about empty shelves at the store, and pretend that it will be temporary. ...But in a few more months when we have Depression-level unemployment , people will be in a very different mood.

It would be interesting if the polls ask not only which candidate you support, but whether the pandemic affected your decision.

CarnalK 03-22-2020 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chappachula (Post 22203668)
It might make sense mathematically....but , like the math of the stock market, past performance does not prove anything.

No, it's not like that.

septimus 03-29-2020 02:06 PM

Here is a simplified look at the Electoral College. States are listed in order of D_vote minus R_vote from the 2016 election. The second percent shown is D+Green vote minus R+Libertarian vote.
various 205
-3.5% -6.3% AZ 11
------------------
-3.7% -6.1% NC 15
-1.2% -2.7% FL 29 *
-0.8% -3.3% WI 10 *
-0.7% -2.3% PA 20 *
-0.2% -2.8% MI 16 *
+0.4% -2.9% NH 4 *
+1.5% -1.1% MN 10
+3.0% -0.2% ME 2
------------------
+2.4% -0.9% NV 6
various 210
By assigning AZ to the Rs and NV to the Ds, we obtain an interesting symmetry: each side has 216 "almost certain" evs with 106 (in 8 states) undecided. (Maine has 4evs total but is shown with only 2 evs because they've voluntarily given up electoral power by awarding 1 each to D and R more-or-less automatically.)

Only five states (FL, WI, PA, MI, NH) are at all likely to be tipping states ó only these states matter! If Trump wins Florida, the Democrat must sweep the (swingable) Rust Belt. If Biden wins Florida (unlikely?) he only needs to also get PA or MI or both WI and NH.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Send questions for Cecil Adams to: cecil@straightdope.com

Send comments about this website to: webmaster@straightdope.com

Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

Advertise on the Straight Dope!
(Your direct line to thousands of the smartest, hippest people on the planet, plus a few total dipsticks.)

Copyright © 2019 STM Reader, LLC.