View Single Post
Old 08-14-2016, 12:56 PM
Shakester Shakester is online now
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,944
I'm going to say Mark Rothko.

To people who get it, his works are gorgeous.

To people who don't get it, they're a con, and the people who (pretend to) like them are dupes. Or something.

I'm not saying anyone has to like anything, but the conspiracy theory version of modern art history deserves the same level of respect as any other conspiracy theory.

ETA: See also; Jackson Pollock.

Last edited by Shakester; 08-14-2016 at 12:57 PM.