View Single Post
  #132  
Old 09-03-2019, 12:43 PM
DrDeth is online now
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 42,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobLibDem View Post
...


The media causes them? Hardy har har. I don't think the shooters are glorified at all. Their names and faces get attention, just as Booth and Oswald did. When their motivation becomes known, such as the racist attacks inspired by one Donald J. T***p, that becomes public. But to say they are glorified is an overstatement.

I think it's a logical fallacy to state that nothing can or should be done about gun violence as long as other means of death are possible.
Yes, and that;s what they want. They are suicides that want to make a name for themselves, and the media give it to them.

It's what we call "science".


https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/b...rJRTObuojybVyc

The Media Is an Accomplice in School Shootings


School shootings are a contagion. And the media are consistent accomplices in most every one of them.

There’s really no useful debate on the point. The consensus of social scientists since David Phillips’ groundbreaking work in 1974 is that highly publicized stories of deviant and dangerous behavior influences copycat incidents. Phillips’ and scores of subsequent studies showed, for example, that suicide rates spike in the week after an inappropriately publicized celebrity suicide. Contrast this trend with no increase in suicides in the week following a media strike that unintentionally suppresses such coverage.

The same is true of school massacres. On Groundhog Day, Feb 2, 1996 a 14-year-old boy walked into his Moses Lake, Washington, Junior High School algebra class and started shooting. He killed his teacher, two classmates and severely wounded another student. Subsequent media coverage obsessed over the color of his clothes, his insidious planning and the inventory of his arsenal. In addition, they practically offered a how-to guide for concealing and deploying weapons in a coat. But what got the most attention was the fact that after shooting his teacher, he delivered a line from the Stephen King novel Rage with charismatic panache. Suddenly, the invisible adolescent was a cultural icon. Within a week, another shooting occurred that clearly echoed that of Feb 2. Then another on February 19. Another on March 11. Yet another on March 13. Along with other similarities, more than one of the apparent copycats also cited King’s novel as a creative resource.


https://www.elon.edu/u/academics/com...HzwQqHI2r9fjYM

https://psmag.com/news/does-the-medi...mass-shootings
A growing body of research suggests that increasingly intense media coverage of mass shootings is partly responsible for their acceleration in the United States...With this in mind, it’s safe to posit that increased exposure to media reports surrounding mass murders have precipitated the rise of copycat killers. There seems to be a correlation between the rise in mass murders and structural expansions in the media with the emergence of the 24-hour cable news cycle

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5296697/
A mass shooting is a complex and destructive act that occurs as a result of many factors. One factor that is relevant to the spread of mass shootings and other “contagious” behaviors is generalized imitation. In instances of mass shootings, the media appear largely responsible for providing the model to imitate. Although there are a variety of strategies that could function in tandem to alter the likelihood of a mass shooting, changing the way the media report mass shootings is one important step in preventing and reducing imitation of these acts. Furthermore, it is likely that media-prompted imitation extends beyond mass shootings. A media effect has been shown with suicide, is implied in mass shootings, and may play a role in other extreme events such as home-grown terrorism and racially motivated crimes.

The responsibility for these acts does not reside with the media, but the media are an important vector for the spread of such behaviors.