View Single Post
Old 05-09-2019, 01:12 AM
nelliebly is offline
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,636
Originally Posted by HurricaneDitka View Post
Yes. I generally consider the law an improvement over the status quo ante.
Perhaps you could explain how an embryo/fetus/baby can be considered a natural person ONLY if it was conceived through consensual sex by too people who are not too closely related to marry each other. If rape or incest results in a pregnancy, that embryo/fetus/baby is not a natural person?

This isn't a gotcha. I think you thought you answered my question, but you did not. I didn't ask if you thought this law was better than the status quo ante. I assumed you did. And it does not mean you oppose the law entirely if you don't approve of one part of it. I've noted many times when others have criticized you for sidestepping questions. I'm giving you a chance to avoid doing so here.