View Single Post
  #973  
Old 06-10-2019, 06:49 PM
wolfpup's Avatar
wolfpup is online now
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manda JO View Post
Jesus Christ. That's fucking insulting. Teaching students with learning disabilities takes incredible skill and craft and training.

Do you actually think "special ed teacher" is an insult? Do you think SpEd is inferior teachers teaching inferior kids?
Indeed. But you're obviously not an aficionado of SamuelA, because this is a classic example of his absolute utter cluelessness. If you want to teach kids with learning disabilities, then according to Sammy's brilliant reasoning it stands to reason that you need to have a teacher with teaching disabilities! This is just how Sammy thinks. Trust him, he's "done the math", and this will optimize the optimization of the learning curve, or something. Sammy has figured this out, and anyone who can't see it is an idiot. You can trust him when he tells you it's inevitable that in the future all special needs kids will be taught by stupid teachers!

I suppose it's also possible he thinks that kids with special needs are worthless. Considering his racist and sociopathic beliefs that were commented on here, that would be consistent with the rest of his reprehensible and ignorant bullshit.

This is actually the intellectual equivalent -- in terms of sheer cluelessness -- to Sammy's solution to the world's climate problem that he so wonderfully articulated in post #952, wherein Sammy proposes "a thin layer of cheap gas", and this magic gas will magically block sunlight, because it's "the opposite of a heating gas" (Sammy's own words). Sammy thus demonstrates a laughable abject ignorance of how greenhouse gases actually work and the basic principles of radiative transfer involved, just for starters. But trust him, because he's "smart" and this is an "obvious" idea that is "certain to happen" (Sammy's own words again), even though it doesn't even make any fucking sense!

Just as a technical side note, even the most crackpot ideas for climate engineering always involve either CO2 sequestration -- which does theoretically make sense -- or some type of forced albedo changes on the surface or upper atmosphere. It's the atmospheric albedo engineering that the IPCC so adamantly rejected, as I previously noted -- Sammy's actual idea is just blithering nonsense. But these other ideas have all been proposed by ordinary scientists who lack Sammy's massive throbbing intellect and at least actually understand how the earth's energy balance model works. Anyway, Sammy has already figured out that scientists are doing science all wrong. The pontificating moron actually has a whole thread about it!